It wouldn’t be about that, it would be to prevent someone from being able to accrue controlling interest of too much property.
If it’s needed, sure, but attach a cost to it.
The U.K. Has been one landowner for a long time, for instance. In Canada, one entire province is effectively controlled by a single person (but still owned by the crown).
It may still be a bad idea, but it’s worth discussing.
FYI to both, taxes on rents are constitutional, and should not go away.
Every plant has a root and the seed is Satanic. I won't deny the roots for the sake of discernment. From 40000 feet, this is discernment. The international works only for himself and shares his wealth only with those willing to sell out their own.
So you want the ultra wealthy to carry a larger part of the tax burden? Because that ship just sailed. Look, it's just past the harbor. Wave!
It wouldn’t be about that, it would be to prevent someone from being able to accrue controlling interest of too much property.
If it’s needed, sure, but attach a cost to it.
The U.K. Has been one landowner for a long time, for instance. In Canada, one entire province is effectively controlled by a single person (but still owned by the crown).
It may still be a bad idea, but it’s worth discussing.
FYI to both, taxes on rents are constitutional, and should not go away.
u/Cuomos_nipple_rings
Yayyyy the Jews win again!
billionaires of every stripe.
Every plant has a root and the seed is Satanic. I won't deny the roots for the sake of discernment. From 40000 feet, this is discernment. The international works only for himself and shares his wealth only with those willing to sell out their own.
What college did you attend that indoctrinated you to hate wealthy people to this extreme?
Does it trigger you that Q+ is a billionaire?