Thanks for posting this, BerlinWallCrosser. It really should be sticked (I'll message the mods).

This is a HUGE resource, although not as well formatted as it might be.

You'd expect the categories below to each have a link taking you to that group of files, but noooo . . . You CAN scroll through fairly quickly, and the files in the first category come up first, then the second, and so on. It helps to open the list to full page.

Here are the categories, along with some description and the number of studies listed in each.

I. Spike protein pathogenicity research library (n=375) Originally part of the outer coat of the SARS-CoV2 virus, where it functions as a “key” to “unlock” (infect) cells, spike proteins are also produced in large amounts by the mRNA “vaccines,” triggering a short-lived immune response in the form of antibodies. However, a growing body of evidence has shown that the spike protein is harmful by itself, including over 370 peer-reviewed scientific papers collected in section I.

II. Spike protein and “vaccine” mRNA biodistribution studies (n=61) In addition to the pathogenic characteristics of the spike protein antigen, over 60 peer-reviewed studies have demonstrated that both the “vaccine” mRNA encoding for the spike protein antigen and the spike protein itself can penetrate distant tissues, causing systemic harms.

III. Spike protein and “vaccine” mRNA persistence studies (n=41) Over 40 peer-reviewed studies confirm that “vaccine” mRNA and the resulting spike protein antigen persist in the tissues of human vaccine recipients and animal test subjects far longer than claimed by public health o]icials; viral spike proteins, resulting from natural infection, have been shown to persist even longer, bolstering concerns that the identical “vaccine” spike may also last longer than anticipated.

IV. Lipid nanoparticle toxicity and allergenicity studies (n=80) 80 peer-reviewed papers show that ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used in the experimental mRNA injections are highly inflammatory on their own, including their polyethylene glycol (PEG) component, an established cause of anaphylaxis (an extreme allergic reaction).

V. COVID-19 “vaccine” immune imprinting library (n=140) Immune imprinting, dubbed “original antigenic sin” by Thomas Francis Jr., occurs when memory B lymphocytes produced in response to an initial viral infection dominate subsequent responses to related viruses. 140 peer-reviewed papers suggest that COVID “vaccines” imprinted the immune systems of recipients through exposure to the “wild type” spike protein from the original Wuhan strain, shaping their response to subsequent variants in potentially harmful ways.

VI. SARS-CoV2 vaccine and viral variant research library (n=70) In addition to the pathogenicity, distribution, and long persistence of the “vaccine” spike protein, this collection of 70 peer-reviewed papers suggests the “vaccines” applied strong selective pressure to the fast-mutating SARS-CoV2 virus, quickly giving rise to “vaccine”-resistant variants.

Dude's email is Eriks ass at gmail.com

A short read for my wife's side of the family (-:
All joking aside will dig into this b/c know they won't and see what I can glean as ammo to keep fighting the good fight for truth. Thanks for the info Berlin

Now THAT is a research paper. Time to start archiving.

And yet, still, Wikipedia claims Dr Simone Gold pushes misinformation about the covid vaccines.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simone_Gold

Q2 earnings report for health insurance will be interesting this month. There are all kinds of trade pieces hinting at claims being up, and someone posted the Centene info a few days ago here.. Stop loss claims are also up 20-30%. (Gee, I wonder why???)

Why is this compiled by a dentist?

Well done Anon.