That would be nice if the law actually expressed rights. But, since all are adepts of the Austrian school of legal thought: law positivism, it means that people need a lot of laws to understand what they can and cannot say.
People need a visible God-like figure to tell them what to do and what to refrain from doing, lest they be eh ..... free.
That should cancel all of MSM.
That's not Free Speech if the government tells you what is legal to speak. THAT IS THE REASON FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
Oh, really? And, pray tell, what muslim, jew or sell-out christian is going to be the illegal content arbiter?
.
What I see:
Too funny.
Bwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Who the heck JUDGES whether the content is illegal? That is not FREE speech! That is fascism!
Sorry.
Your ghey sign is illegal.
-The People
It is the typical Montesquieu flip:
Your rights are what the law says they are.
That would be nice if the law actually expressed rights. But, since all are adepts of the Austrian school of legal thought: law positivism, it means that people need a lot of laws to understand what they can and cannot say.
People need a visible God-like figure to tell them what to do and what to refrain from doing, lest they be eh ..... free.
This is EU in a nutshell: Tyranny.