Why is it that with weather manipulation never having been a topic before, EVER, except in some fringe circles - to the point that even among conspiracy theorists it was a fairly fringe theory. There was talk of “chemtrails”, but not even a ton of that, and the main concern there was that it was poisoning us, not that it was cu freak weather events
Suddenly, within 1-2 years it’s gone from not really even being a topic among conspiracy theorists to where even normies are well versed in it, acting like cloud seeding has always been a thing, Meanwhile, liberals, who have said for years that the weather has to be changed to undo the effects of climate change, are now concurrently claiming that there is no way anyone could ever change the weather.
Nevermind the [potential] weather manipulation itself, what the crap sort of sudden mass narrative formation is this, and where did it come from? The stories about weather manipulation formed as fast as the tornados and deluges. Where are they getting these sudden talking points from?
Because that is all it is. Arm-waving over imaginary harm is no more than fear of witchcraft. By the way, it is an ionosphere physics research facility. They are not studying "radio science."
To understand what HAARP is and does is 'the science'. The term 'radio waves' refers to specific frequencies and type of wave. Not exactly what is emitted from HAARP, although early attempts were detected by radio operators and called 'Woodpecker' because of the noise it created in the background.
There is no longer a normal 'pattern' of weather, but now a continual upsetting of previous patterns. This is being pitched and caught......one source of origin and other sources to 'steer' and manipulate it. These signals can actually be seen on some weather radar source sites if one knows what to look for. I myself can spot the signature and immediately find the ground source for the signal which is nearly always an existing airport, military base/facility. Cloud seeding is a separate technology sometimes used in tandem with HAARP style emittors.
This need for detail is the thing and books on HAARP will provide much of it. The rest can be surmised by studying the history of frequency experiments. Like everything, it's a matter of information, not opinion.
I haven't seen any HAARP critic show any understanding of the system or the phenomena. Nothing but conclusions based on speculation over physics ill understood. I've known about the EM spectrum since high school, so explaining radio waves to me is puerile.
I've seen people make a big deal about NEXRAD sensor locations. Weather will be noticed around those locations...because you can only see what you are able to see. Where there is no NEXRAD, there is no weather observation.
I've seen "normal" weather all my life, so long as you accept that there will always be some "abnormal" weather. That is the nature of a stochastic distribution.
What is a HAARP critic?
Belief is one thing. Facts are another.
I watch weather radar every day and night. I follow worldwide patterns daily.
I've had a lifelong interest in weather. Discussed weather 'facts' with meteorologists and oceanographers (where patterns used to originate). What was 'normal' is no longer and in fact, I predicted this very thing a long time ago, that 'weird weather' would occur become normalized. Cyclones on land, Tornadoes in winter that I called White Tornadoes, flooding rivers from the sky......developed a design for a domed glass compound house that could withstand hurricane winds, etc. You either know the tech behind HAARP or you LARP 'about' it.
If you want to avoid "weird weather," come to the Pacific Northwest. We have none. Either that, or it is continuous. I wouldn't know the difference.
Arm waving over imaginary harm. I had that happen to me.