Upon looking at the many 14th Amendment sites, it is obvious that it was Nothing but the start of minorities (blacks) get Special 'rights' BECAUSE they are minorities (blacks) The entire obama farce was based on this failed idea.
Looking at all the decisions listed here that were based on the 14th amendment, it seems to go well beyond special rights for minorities. It looks like it was used as a basis for Federal government to start interfering in matters of State jurisdiction, and was even used to warp the meaning of first amendment.
14th Amendment is THE BASIS for the US CORP's existence. It theoretically allows a Municipal Service Corp (MSC) to be "contracted" to perform all state services INSTEAD OF the sovereign state (which is subsumed by the MSC), despite it being a most obvious and indisputable violation of Article IV, Section 4 which prohibits "corporate gov't" within the sovereign states.
EVEN worse the MSC is created by a foreign entity (State Bars, domiciled in DC as part of ABA, all created prior to 1932 Amendment), and the MSC is owned by the US Treasury, making all states the property of the Federal Gov't Corp created 09MAR1933 and activated 15OCT1933, replacing the Republic as "acting gov't" per 1932 Amendment.
Anyone who starts at 14th amendment or Organic Act etc, and finds their way to the Banking Act of 1933 has done good research.
I see so many Anons stuck on one date that "made US into a corporation". It was a slow gradual process that started in 1812 and took 2 wars (one with British and one Civil) and a 120 years to fully be completed.
Thats how thorough and patient these f*ckers are.
And yet they are blowing everything through the roof by putting it into overdrive. Thats natural? Thats even possible? Only if we have already won the war!
Admittedly, my deep dives cover 1791-1841 and 1929-present. The volume of nefariousness 1929-present might actually exceed the 1868-1919 "cabal foundation laid."
No, it is not true that the 14th Amendment was never ratified. The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868. It was the third of the Reconstruction Amendments, following the 13th and 15th Amendments. The 14th Amendment provides several important clauses, including granting citizenship to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States," and ensuring equal protection under the laws.
Political or Speculative Elements:
There have been conspiracy theories or claims about the ratification process of the 14th Amendment, suggesting that it was not properly ratified. However, these claims are not supported by credible legal sources or historical evidence. The amendment was certified by the U.S. Congress and has been in effect since its ratification in 1868.
The necessary and proper clause is often abused to arrive at a conclusion that is favorable to the imperialists.
Chat-4.o went even so far as to create an implied power theory based on this and the supremacy clause
I countered it with 2 considerations:
that the States create the Federal, so the Federal is the Child, and the Child has only Expressed power, whereas the parent (viz amendment 10) reserves all rights, including to abolish the Federal government, federal law cannot supersede these rights reserved, as there is no power in the child to do so. It is null and void.
The supreme law of the land can only be a consequence to the status of a law, if this law is pursuant of the expressed power within the constitution given to the Federal Government.
If the argument is that the states never left, despite their due process secession, then they could not have been put under military occupation, as the people of those states were denied constitutional representation, and there could not be any law that would prohibit the eligible people in such states, based on their own rules, from participating in the reconstitution of their government based on a state constitution that encompasses the Constitution of 1793 itself AND the 13 amendments as originally written.
Since, the current 13th, 14th amendment were not then (1865-1868) put into force, the only fall back to include all living souls is the declaration of Independence, and the subsequent discussion on what to do with the not yet emancipated slaves and their children. Since this issue was not the official reason to wage the war against Southern secession, it follows that
The Union should have accepted the secession because there were irreconcilable differences that have later served that the wedge of the coercion: in order to end the military dictatorship by the USA in those CSA states
Admit that it is all been illegal, and things have to be put to the people as to what they want.
But, in order to do so, you have to clean up the voter roles .....
Observation:
I find it highly suspicious that the first 13 (as originally written) caused severe civil discussion and debate, but, passed with flying colors. The new 13th and the later additions, like the 16th and 17th, etc, are all badly written, abusive, and the odor of illegality is glued to it.
A second observation: Turning back the clock on what is often seen as progressive, without being a betterment, requires timing.
Freeing of slaves is sequentially the 14th since the original 13th stripping foreign agents of citizenship was re-ratified (and published as LAW) by Indiana as 18 of 24 on January 30th, 1824. It is active and allows all lawyers in the US who are members of their state bars (subs of foreign AMA in DC) to be stripped of citizenship and then deported.
If Trump "nationalizes" DC, then the foreign occupation of states ends, but the MSC contracts must be terminated by Governors to restore state sovereignty and free them from Federal control completely. Given that Trump is using Fed control against Blue states to deny funding right now, he will likely delay this maneuver for some time.
The 14th Amendment stripped the NATURAL RIGHTS of we-the-people by way of federal government "privileges and benefits" that were given to the freed slaves. No independent nation state (New York, Virginia, Ohio, etc.) was willing to give the freed slaves sovereign state citizenship so this was the solution they come up with. There was no such thing as "Federal citizenship" prior to it, as such an idea didn't even make sense as the government was merely a *business" operating on behalf of the independent nation states within the CONTRACT between them, known as the Constitution.
But as the years passed by the option to declare oneself a "New York State Citizen" or "Virginia State Citizen" slowly disappeared on forms, legal documents, etc. and eventually there was only one rational box to check, which was of course all we see today "U.S. citizen" on all our forms.
As the cabal's "federal government" INVENTED the very idea of a "U.S. citizen" it now retained the right to control all aspects of it, including the "privileges and benefits" it chose to grant to people claiming to be one.
"Civil rights" are one such example. Vastly inferior to our natural rights which he had and retained up until the war. And this is why we call it the "civil war" today. We-the-People were UNLAWFULLY....but....LEGALLY TRANSFORMED into vassals of the federal government....on paper of course.
The free people of the United States had literally become CIVILIZED, as per the LEGAL definition of the word, which meant we-the-people could now be controlled by their own, original creation, the business now known as "federal government".
In the beginning, God created man, man created government. But now the cabal twisted that around by being the "creator" of the "U.S. Citizen" which they could thus then tell such legal fictional entities what they can and can't do as per their wishes.
Just look where we are now. The proof, as they say, is indeed in the pudding. Not one in a million Americans understand these simple facts for good reason.
Upon looking at the many 14th Amendment sites, it is obvious that it was Nothing but the start of minorities (blacks) get Special 'rights' BECAUSE they are minorities (blacks) The entire obama farce was based on this failed idea.
Looking at all the decisions listed here that were based on the 14th amendment, it seems to go well beyond special rights for minorities. It looks like it was used as a basis for Federal government to start interfering in matters of State jurisdiction, and was even used to warp the meaning of first amendment.
14th Amendment is THE BASIS for the US CORP's existence. It theoretically allows a Municipal Service Corp (MSC) to be "contracted" to perform all state services INSTEAD OF the sovereign state (which is subsumed by the MSC), despite it being a most obvious and indisputable violation of Article IV, Section 4 which prohibits "corporate gov't" within the sovereign states.
EVEN worse the MSC is created by a foreign entity (State Bars, domiciled in DC as part of ABA, all created prior to 1932 Amendment), and the MSC is owned by the US Treasury, making all states the property of the Federal Gov't Corp created 09MAR1933 and activated 15OCT1933, replacing the Republic as "acting gov't" per 1932 Amendment.
Anyone who starts at 14th amendment or Organic Act etc, and finds their way to the Banking Act of 1933 has done good research.
I see so many Anons stuck on one date that "made US into a corporation". It was a slow gradual process that started in 1812 and took 2 wars (one with British and one Civil) and a 120 years to fully be completed.
Thats how thorough and patient these f*ckers are.
And yet they are blowing everything through the roof by putting it into overdrive. Thats natural? Thats even possible? Only if we have already won the war!
Admittedly, my deep dives cover 1791-1841 and 1929-present. The volume of nefariousness 1929-present might actually exceed the 1868-1919 "cabal foundation laid."
upvoted for info
abolish the 14th
Sounds to me like the Chevron decision grew out if the 14th as well...
Very insightful.
Facts:
No, it is not true that the 14th Amendment was never ratified. The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified on July 9, 1868. It was the third of the Reconstruction Amendments, following the 13th and 15th Amendments. The 14th Amendment provides several important clauses, including granting citizenship to "all persons born or naturalized in the United States," and ensuring equal protection under the laws.
Political or Speculative Elements:
There have been conspiracy theories or claims about the ratification process of the 14th Amendment, suggesting that it was not properly ratified. However, these claims are not supported by credible legal sources or historical evidence. The amendment was certified by the U.S. Congress and has been in effect since its ratification in 1868.
The necessary and proper clause is often abused to arrive at a conclusion that is favorable to the imperialists.
Chat-4.o went even so far as to create an implied power theory based on this and the supremacy clause
I countered it with 2 considerations:
The supreme law of the land can only be a consequence to the status of a law, if this law is pursuant of the expressed power within the constitution given to the Federal Government.
Since, the current 13th, 14th amendment were not then (1865-1868) put into force, the only fall back to include all living souls is the declaration of Independence, and the subsequent discussion on what to do with the not yet emancipated slaves and their children. Since this issue was not the official reason to wage the war against Southern secession, it follows that
But, in order to do so, you have to clean up the voter roles .....
Observation:
I find it highly suspicious that the first 13 (as originally written) caused severe civil discussion and debate, but, passed with flying colors. The new 13th and the later additions, like the 16th and 17th, etc, are all badly written, abusive, and the odor of illegality is glued to it.
A second observation: Turning back the clock on what is often seen as progressive, without being a betterment, requires timing.
Freeing of slaves is sequentially the 14th since the original 13th stripping foreign agents of citizenship was re-ratified (and published as LAW) by Indiana as 18 of 24 on January 30th, 1824. It is active and allows all lawyers in the US who are members of their state bars (subs of foreign AMA in DC) to be stripped of citizenship and then deported.
If Trump "nationalizes" DC, then the foreign occupation of states ends, but the MSC contracts must be terminated by Governors to restore state sovereignty and free them from Federal control completely. Given that Trump is using Fed control against Blue states to deny funding right now, he will likely delay this maneuver for some time.
The 14th Amendment stripped the NATURAL RIGHTS of we-the-people by way of federal government "privileges and benefits" that were given to the freed slaves. No independent nation state (New York, Virginia, Ohio, etc.) was willing to give the freed slaves sovereign state citizenship so this was the solution they come up with. There was no such thing as "Federal citizenship" prior to it, as such an idea didn't even make sense as the government was merely a *business" operating on behalf of the independent nation states within the CONTRACT between them, known as the Constitution.
But as the years passed by the option to declare oneself a "New York State Citizen" or "Virginia State Citizen" slowly disappeared on forms, legal documents, etc. and eventually there was only one rational box to check, which was of course all we see today "U.S. citizen" on all our forms.
As the cabal's "federal government" INVENTED the very idea of a "U.S. citizen" it now retained the right to control all aspects of it, including the "privileges and benefits" it chose to grant to people claiming to be one.
"Civil rights" are one such example. Vastly inferior to our natural rights which he had and retained up until the war. And this is why we call it the "civil war" today. We-the-People were UNLAWFULLY....but....LEGALLY TRANSFORMED into vassals of the federal government....on paper of course.
The free people of the United States had literally become CIVILIZED, as per the LEGAL definition of the word, which meant we-the-people could now be controlled by their own, original creation, the business now known as "federal government".
In the beginning, God created man, man created government. But now the cabal twisted that around by being the "creator" of the "U.S. Citizen" which they could thus then tell such legal fictional entities what they can and can't do as per their wishes.
Just look where we are now. The proof, as they say, is indeed in the pudding. Not one in a million Americans understand these simple facts for good reason.