Kash Patel Sends John Solomon a Prior Whistleblower Report to Highlight on Sean Hannity - The Last Refuge
FBI Director Kash Patel sends John Solomon a declassified whistleblower report, showing how a prior House Intelligence Committee staffer blew the whistle on then HPSCI ranking member Adam Schiff, who was giving the staff instructions to leak fabricated int...
There may be a statute of limitations on the underlying crimes, such as leaking classified information, but there is no statute of limitations on treason, correct?
There is no statute of limitations for RICO cases, either. So, it may be enfuriating to see the history of a whistleblower, who DID GO to the FBI, and be ignored for so long...
But, here we are: Project Veritas is confirming that [insert list of names] were up to their necks in a conspiracy to commit treason against an elected president.
The evidence which was previously considered to be 'outside the statute' , no matter how damning, or proof positive, because of the li'l waiting game swamp-rats had been playing - is now evidence.
RICO cases can join all the dots between different crimes done by different people, and make a 'bigger picture', and there is no limit to how many people get caught, or how long they had to sit on the evidence..
Funny how Bill Barr was focused on building a RICO case against Trump. And now he is looking at a boomerang.
"There is no statute of limitations for ongoing RICO cases, . . ." (because the date is reset with each action done by any co-conspirator in support of the conspiracy [by lying under oath to cover it up, for example].)
Zigackly.
What if Bill Barr got charged with RICO?
According to Barr, its hard to defend against
Nor is there a statute of limitations on an ongoing conspiracy.
I swear I don't know how all that works my fren.
By his own deeds Adam continues the conspiracy to this very day as result there arr no limitations available for him at the moment. There is no clock on sedition or treason.
FBI Director Kash Patel sends John Solomon a declassified whistleblower report, showing how a prior House Intelligence Committee staffer blew the whistle on then HPSCI ranking member Adam Schiff, who was giving the staff instructions to leak fabricated intelligence reports on Trump-Russia to smear President Donald Trump in 2017 and 2018.
According to the release {SEE HERE}, the FBI eventually received and investigated the whistleblower claims; then in 2023, sent the information to the Merrick Garland/Lisa Monaco DOJ, who took no action because the claim was now beyond the statute of limitations.
Read those dates carefully, because what this report from Kash Patel and John Solomon actually outlines is something we have all been very frustrated with.
As Solomon now notes, … “The alleged leaks fall outside the statute of limitations for prosecution on most legal theories, but the revelations nevertheless come at a sensitive time for Schiff“.. At the time of the Whistleblower report, the information to the FBI and DOJ would have been evidence that could have prosecuted Adam Schiff. However, now the information is limited to just providing I-told-you-so’s.
There are a couple of really frustrating aspects to this, and the pattern is transparently obvious.
The FBI and DOJ from 2017 to 2023, under both Donald Trump and Joe Biden’s administration, played the silo game of control of evidence. They did nothing with the evidence until the statute of limitations had tolled, which then provides Main Justice with the justification for doing nothing.
In 2025, understanding the public is insanely frustrated with the lack of accountability, the pretending game is now deployed by the FBI under Kash Patel, through John Solomon, to the broadcast venue of Sean Hannity. At the end of this clickbait circle-jerk is nothing. Again, no accountability, but a bunch of controlled information operatives saying, “Well, let’s see what the DOJ does with this now.”
A pox on all their houses.
There is no doubt in my mind this is a clear example of why the DC system uses special counsels (Mueller, Durham, et al) purposefully to create “ongoing investigations” as capture nets for information/evidence control.
“It’s under investigation, and we don’t speak about ongoing investigations.”
In real time, from 2019 to 2020, I was providing this type of evidence from within the silo system to John Durham and Bill Aldenberg who were designated information managers.
In my naiveté’, as I initially opened these doors, I thought some form of accountability would be possible, because the evidence was direct, irrefutable and without denial. However, once Aldenberg and Durham clearly said they could only act on evidence they ‘discovered’ themselves, and they could not act on evidence provided by “others” because that would make the “evidence political,” I quickly realized this was all going to amount to nothing.
Now, we are looking in hindsight at evidence from inside the system, provided to these investigators by participants inside the system, yet they also did nothing with it at the time it held value.
So, here’s the basic construct of how the DC game is played.
Evidence delivered from outside DC cannot be used by those who are charged with investigating corruption within DC. Evidence delivered from inside DC, goes into the system of “ongoing investigations” (special counsels) until its usefulness is exhausted by the clock-ticking. If the risk of accountability remains, the special counsels are extended until that accountability clock has expired.
Once the accountability clock has expired, if another party comes along (Kash) and releases that evidence (Solomon), the value only exists insofar as it generates clickbait income (Just News), column inches and punditry talking points (Sean Hannity) for the DC proletariat.
The Patel’s, Bondi’s, Solomon’s and Hannity’s then play this game of pretend. Packaging the corruption evidence as accountability hopium and selling it to the addicted battered conservatives.
Insert vote. Pull lever. Get hopium pellet.
Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
Who is continuing to buy this game?
Sedition: What Is the Legal Definition of Sedition? The U.S. Code defines sedition as a crime involving two or more people in the United States for any of the following purposes:
To conspire to overthrow or destroy by force the government of the United States or to wage war against it To oppose by force the authority of the United States government To prevent, hinder, or delay by force the execution of any law of the United States To take, seize, or possess by force any property of the United States
IMHO, the administration and white-hat talking heads are purposely minimizing the criminality and prosecutability of what's been disclosed to allow the world to absorb it and to appear to not be pursuing their political enemies in a tyrannical, dictatorial fashion.
Justice must be "by the book" to be accepted - now and in the anals of history.
If the truth about upcoming justice were dropped too soon:
*many bad actors might try to escape prosecution or to otherwise thwart "what is coming" (via false flags, color revolution to cause chaos and attempt government overthrow, etc.);
*many brainwashed liberals could lose their minds and react accordingly;
and
*many normies may not be able to handle the magnitude of the criminality and what may happen to the guilty.
Corruption that's taken decades to develop and infilitrate seemingly EVERYTHING won't be eliminated by impatience and premature arrests. Applicable charges will be made, trials/tribunals will occur and justice will be meted out when whistleblowers have ratted-out rats, investigations are complete, cases are well-formed/airtight and the time is right. NCSWIC.
The answer to all of this is the approximately 500k sealed indictments. Each indictment can charge multiple people and there are no statue of limitations.