the exclusive story of how the United States intelligence community funded, nurtured and incubated Google as part of a drive to dominate the world through control of information. Seed-funded by the NSA and CIA, Google was merely the first among a plethora of private sector start-ups co-opted by US intelligence to retain ‘information superiority.’
bUt GoOgLe Is A pRiVaTe CoMpAnY tHeY cAn Do WhAt ThEy WaNt!
What don't I understand? The intel agencies took our taxes and spent them on projects then turned around and made up some gay tech bro stories, slapped figureheads on them and called them private companies? So now they can get around the Bill of Rights?
I never do this, but you are a "special" person demanding that someone else do research you want - for you. I also found it funny that you called the OP a halfwit while misspelling "you're". Classic. Friendly advice - You may want to tone it down a bit because I think you may soon get a "break".
In 1994 — the same year the Highlands Forum was founded under the stewardship of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the ONA, and DARPA — two young PhD students at Stanford University, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, made their breakthrough on the first automated web crawling and page ranking application. That application remains the core component of what eventually became Google’s search service. Brin and Page had performed their work with funding from the Digital Library Initiative (DLI), a multi-agency programme of the National Science Foundation (NSF), NASA and DARPA. But that’s just one side of the story.
Throughout the development of the search engine, Sergey Brin reported regularly and directly to two people who were not Stanford faculty at all: Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham and Dr. Rick Steinheiser. Both were representatives of a sensitive US intelligence community research programme on information security and data-mining.
Thuraisingham is currently the Louis A. Beecherl distinguished professor and executive director of the Cyber Security Research Institute at the University of Texas, Dallas, and a sought-after expert on data-mining, data management and information security issues. But in the 1990s, she worked for the MITRE Corp., a leading US defense contractor, where she managed the Massive Digital Data Systems initiative, a project sponsored by the NSA, CIA, and the Director of Central Intelligence, to foster innovative research in information technology.
“We funded Stanford University through the computer scientist Jeffrey Ullman, who had several promising graduate students working on many exciting areas,” Prof. Thuraisingham told me. “One of them was Sergey Brin, the founder of Google. The intelligence community’s MDDS program essentially provided Brin seed-funding, which was supplemented by many other sources, including the private sector.”
If a smart college student get's tapped by the CIA to design a project for them, and gets funding from them, is the project they end up creating a
private sector
public sector
project?
(same question applies to a project they were already working on but then which later is hinged to CIA & CIA money)
The MDDS abstract published online at the University of Texas confirms that the rationale for the CIA-NSA project was to “provide seed money to develop data management technologies which are of high-risk and high-pay-off,” including techniques for “querying, browsing, and filtering; transaction processing; accesses methods and indexing; metadata management and data modelling; and integrating heterogeneous databases; as well as developing appropriate architectures.” The ultimate vision of the program was to “provide for the seamless access and fusion of massive amounts of data, information and knowledge in a heterogeneous, real-time environment” for use by the Pentagon, intelligence community and potentially across government.
Perhaps the article's title is (purposefully?) inflammatory, hyperbolic, and lacks proper nuance. In essence, Google, as we know it today, was created by the government.
What's your take on my question? What class is the project to be placed into?
To me, regarding the big tech companies, it's a distinction without a difference. The level of government influence over them is hard to quantify but armed with that Q post (+others), +looking at the way these companies behave, one may easily deduce that they are in fact arms of the government. What's your answer to the question? How do you break it down?
I see no reason why they shouldn't be classified as public utilities.
"In 1995, one of the first and most promising MDDS grants went to a computer-science research team at Stanford University with a decade-long history of working with NSF and DARPA grants. The primary objective of this grant was “query optimization of very complex queries that are described using the ‘query flocks’ approach.” A second grant—the DARPA-NSF grant most closely associated with Google’s origin—was part of a coordinated effort to build a massive digital library using the internet as its backbone. Both grants funded research by two graduate students who were making rapid advances in web-page ranking, as well as tracking (and making sense of) user queries: future Google cofounders Sergey Brin and Larry Page."
Again, at what point does allllllll this shit cease to be private enterprise and become public utility?u/PatriotTalk1776
It is quite amazing, the journey of how these sneaky poor devils
went from captivity of these "cruel nazi oppressors" to 6
grillion deaths from muh holocaust insect spray to
brand new little Rothschild colony to communist control of the
world which includes the CIA, Mossad, MI5, MI6,
To the murder of one of our greatest Presidents to
Censoring platforms like GOOGLE to bury the truth.
To invasion of all white countries with dark people.
All the while in our own backyard, these dispensation baptist church people, whos doctrine goes back to the Schofield Bible commentary and Darbyism, bow down and worship these evil frauds to this day, labeling them as God's chosen people when they told us in the late 1940's they were not the ancient Hebrews.
Congratulations people for enabling the devil through your misinterpretation of scripture.
That misinterpretation of scripture as you accurately put it, is rooted in the Counter-Reformation. The Catholic church needed to present alternatives to the Reformers, who all identified the pope as the anti-christ and the Catholic church as the woman riding the beast from Rev. 17
You've got me on this research because I have not gone down this path before.
But what is interesting is I got a call a few years ago, to go out to do some work at Turning Point of Pastor David Jeremiah fame and when I got there I was looking at a rather large warehouse.
The manager was a very nice man and had we had time he was actually going to give me a tour of the place and introduce me to Pastor Jeremiah but time was an issue for me so the tour never happened.
One thing the manager said to me was "we consider Catholics to be our brothers and sisters in Christ" which shocked me.
However today, it does not shock me.
The point I am making is there are lots of nice people in religions and denominations of all types but doctrine absolutely makes a difference.
Oh absolutely. And to be clear I don't think all Catholics are unsaved pagans. I just think the real christians in that church are trapped in a satanic system...erm...THE satanic system, the top dog...
From my understanding, Revelation calls it "Mystery Babylon the Great" and that it is a "mother", thus, we can see its "offspring" in all the numerous Orders and Societies (Knights of Malta, Jesuit Order, Knights Templar, Knights of the Holy Sepulchur, etc) as well as all the churches which sprung forth from it (EO, Lutheran, Anglican, Methodist, etc etc). Institutionalized religion itself appears to be the subject of God's condemnation. (No where in the New Testament is the church told to organize itself into multi-church governments with single nodes of power over multiple churches. The power structure stopped at the top of EACH LOCAL CHURCH.)
Furthermore, it is spiritually called Babylon, which is descended from the Tower of Babel, ie. the first time fallen man organized itself into a pyramid heirarchy with a single man at the top. And what does the Catholic church feature? Alas, it features a pyramid structure with a single man at the top! (the pope)
Another great post and I am glad to have run into you today.
Yes these days I have been hard on dispensationals because of their blind support of "Israil" which are antichrist but I need to show more mercy to a denomination that blessed my life with so many friends back in my 20's which was years ago.
I confess that as a young man in my early 20's when I was on my own I knew I had to find a venue where I could meet friends that would not cause me harm.
So I found a Baptist Church that I attended one Sunday morning. It didn't take long for the young people to find me.
It wasnt about doctrine at that age so much but about making friends and God blessed me and boy did he bless me in that decade with friends across that church and the next maga church that I attended.
My cup runneth over with friends back then.
I was in 7 weddings.
Then there is a time in life to grow up and pay attention to the details. "Doctrine"
When I mentioned to a friend in recent years to a problem I had with the dispensation doctrine he said to me "yes but didn' t you make a lot of friends at this church" ?
That was the perfect come back and he was right but truth and doctrine are important.
To your point is it possible for a person in a bad denomination or religous sect to be saved??
Of course there is. Calling and saving the Elect, his Elect is the sole responsibility of God Almighty. He will always find his people and uses us to spread his gospel. But with God, ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE.
winn, holy cow your getting some heat. How about this. . . One question. How does the gubmint get a science project into the public sector and why would they do that ? Then the pointed response becomes to install a "Face" to continue to receive ALL the revenue and . . . IPO baby. easy peasy
How does the gubmint get a science project into the public sector
By funding it, like they did with Google et cet.
and why would they do that ?
to make progress, develop useful stuff
My problem isn't the fact that the government funds private citizen's science projects and delivers the end results to us all to use. I love the internet! My problem is with them LYING to us about them, PRETENDING they are organic, private companies, and VIOLATING OUR RIGHTS via those companies, like they've done repeatedly throughout the last 15 years.
If they were all PROPERLY CLASSIFIED as Public Utility, they would be bound by the Constitution / Bill of Rights. It would be very much illegal to censor lawful speech or manipulate the search engine to bias towards one view or the other, for example
They are doing worse than lying. People like Bezos, Gates, Jobs & Zuckerburg are just faces, they didn't develop the tech, that was D.A.R.P.A etc. They are not rich, the $$ goes back to the black budget. Think of all the cash from Google. They are American Taxpayer companies, thats the point.
This was written by a Gaurdian and Atlantic employee. Also a novelist, don't waste your time. Most around here could explain this topic in a paragraph, while submitting a stack of indictments for those involved in the crimes.
bUt GoOgLe Is A pRiVaTe CoMpAnY tHeY cAn Do WhAt ThEy WaNt!
Yesterday's post, relevent: YouTube is launching its AI-powered age verification system today,... YouTube will start using AI to guess your age. If it’s wrong, you’ll have to prove it (see comments for details) https://greatawakening.win/p/19BtBnVV7F/youtube-is-launching-its-aipow/c/
The Bypass of the Constitution
Private corporations aren’t bound by the Bill of Rights. That means government can outsource unconstitutional acts to the corporate sector.
The government says, “We didn’t do it — it’s a private company.”
The company says, “We’re just following guidelines.”
And your rights vanish in the ping-pong of plausible deniability.
The template: https://qalerts.app/?n=2989
What don't I understand? The intel agencies took our taxes and spent them on projects then turned around and made up some gay tech bro stories, slapped figureheads on them and called them private companies? So now they can get around the Bill of Rights?
The template https://qalerts.app/?n=2989
kek, you're a special one huh?
Just read the article, the Q post, or don't
I never do this, but you are a "special" person demanding that someone else do research you want - for you. I also found it funny that you called the OP a halfwit while misspelling "you're". Classic. Friendly advice - You may want to tone it down a bit because I think you may soon get a "break".
this'll get you goin lil buddy
In 1994 — the same year the Highlands Forum was founded under the stewardship of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the ONA, and DARPA — two young PhD students at Stanford University, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, made their breakthrough on the first automated web crawling and page ranking application. That application remains the core component of what eventually became Google’s search service. Brin and Page had performed their work with funding from the Digital Library Initiative (DLI), a multi-agency programme of the National Science Foundation (NSF), NASA and DARPA. But that’s just one side of the story.
Throughout the development of the search engine, Sergey Brin reported regularly and directly to two people who were not Stanford faculty at all: Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham and Dr. Rick Steinheiser. Both were representatives of a sensitive US intelligence community research programme on information security and data-mining.
Thuraisingham is currently the Louis A. Beecherl distinguished professor and executive director of the Cyber Security Research Institute at the University of Texas, Dallas, and a sought-after expert on data-mining, data management and information security issues. But in the 1990s, she worked for the MITRE Corp., a leading US defense contractor, where she managed the Massive Digital Data Systems initiative, a project sponsored by the NSA, CIA, and the Director of Central Intelligence, to foster innovative research in information technology.
“We funded Stanford University through the computer scientist Jeffrey Ullman, who had several promising graduate students working on many exciting areas,” Prof. Thuraisingham told me. “One of them was Sergey Brin, the founder of Google. The intelligence community’s MDDS program essentially provided Brin seed-funding, which was supplemented by many other sources, including the private sector.”
keep reading, it gets better
opinion piece, lmao
u/PatriotTalk1776 a clarifying question, if you will:
If a smart college student get's tapped by the CIA to design a project for them, and gets funding from them, is the project they end up creating a
project?
(same question applies to a project they were already working on but then which later is hinged to CIA & CIA money)
The abstract is to be found here: https://web.archive.org/web/20150124095748/https://www.utdallas.edu/~bxt043000/Motivational-Articles/Big_Data-Have_we_seen_it_before.pdf
So, again, if the government is funding and steering a private citizen's project, is that project public or private?
Perhaps the article's title is (purposefully?) inflammatory, hyperbolic, and lacks proper nuance. In essence, Google, as we know it today, was created by the government.
What's your take on my question? What class is the project to be placed into?
To me, regarding the big tech companies, it's a distinction without a difference. The level of government influence over them is hard to quantify but armed with that Q post (+others), +looking at the way these companies behave, one may easily deduce that they are in fact arms of the government. What's your answer to the question? How do you break it down?
I see no reason why they shouldn't be classified as public utilities.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180115190219/http://db.cs.pitt.edu/idm/reports/1998/9631952.html
found at https://qz.com/1145669/googles-true-origin-partly-lies-in-cia-and-nsa-research-grants-for-mass-surveillance
"In 1995, one of the first and most promising MDDS grants went to a computer-science research team at Stanford University with a decade-long history of working with NSF and DARPA grants. The primary objective of this grant was “query optimization of very complex queries that are described using the ‘query flocks’ approach.” A second grant—the DARPA-NSF grant most closely associated with Google’s origin—was part of a coordinated effort to build a massive digital library using the internet as its backbone. Both grants funded research by two graduate students who were making rapid advances in web-page ranking, as well as tracking (and making sense of) user queries: future Google cofounders Sergey Brin and Larry Page."
Again, at what point does allllllll this shit cease to be private enterprise and become public utility? u/PatriotTalk1776
https://qz.com/1145669/googles-true-origin-partly-lies-in-cia-and-nsa-research-grants-for-mass-surveillance
I do appreciate the squabble. It leads to further digging and clarity 👊 sorry for being an ass about it
And facebook and twitter and Microsoft and Apple?
yes yes yes and probably yes 🤣
Don't forget Amazon...
It is quite amazing, the journey of how these sneaky poor devils
went from captivity of these "cruel nazi oppressors" to 6
grillion deaths from muh holocaust insect spray to
brand new little Rothschild colony to communist control of the
world which includes the CIA, Mossad, MI5, MI6,
To the murder of one of our greatest Presidents to
Censoring platforms like GOOGLE to bury the truth.
To invasion of all white countries with dark people.
All the while in our own backyard, these dispensation baptist church people, whos doctrine goes back to the Schofield Bible commentary and Darbyism, bow down and worship these evil frauds to this day, labeling them as God's chosen people when they told us in the late 1940's they were not the ancient Hebrews.
Congratulations people for enabling the devil through your misinterpretation of scripture.
That misinterpretation of scripture as you accurately put it, is rooted in the Counter-Reformation. The Catholic church needed to present alternatives to the Reformers, who all identified the pope as the anti-christ and the Catholic church as the woman riding the beast from Rev. 17
You can thank Francisco Ribera and Cardinal Bellarmine for 'Futurism' https://smyrna.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/the_jesuits_catholic_counter_reformation%E2%80%94preterism_and_futurism.pdf
from my comment https://greatawakening.win/p/19Bst3zBdl/x/c/4eVKTmbkjgq
You've got me on this research because I have not gone down this path before.
But what is interesting is I got a call a few years ago, to go out to do some work at Turning Point of Pastor David Jeremiah fame and when I got there I was looking at a rather large warehouse.
The manager was a very nice man and had we had time he was actually going to give me a tour of the place and introduce me to Pastor Jeremiah but time was an issue for me so the tour never happened.
One thing the manager said to me was "we consider Catholics to be our brothers and sisters in Christ" which shocked me.
However today, it does not shock me.
The point I am making is there are lots of nice people in religions and denominations of all types but doctrine absolutely makes a difference.
Thanks for links and I will look at this.
Oh absolutely. And to be clear I don't think all Catholics are unsaved pagans. I just think the real christians in that church are trapped in a satanic system...erm...THE satanic system, the top dog...
From my understanding, Revelation calls it "Mystery Babylon the Great" and that it is a "mother", thus, we can see its "offspring" in all the numerous Orders and Societies (Knights of Malta, Jesuit Order, Knights Templar, Knights of the Holy Sepulchur, etc) as well as all the churches which sprung forth from it (EO, Lutheran, Anglican, Methodist, etc etc). Institutionalized religion itself appears to be the subject of God's condemnation. (No where in the New Testament is the church told to organize itself into multi-church governments with single nodes of power over multiple churches. The power structure stopped at the top of EACH LOCAL CHURCH.)
Furthermore, it is spiritually called Babylon, which is descended from the Tower of Babel, ie. the first time fallen man organized itself into a pyramid heirarchy with a single man at the top. And what does the Catholic church feature? Alas, it features a pyramid structure with a single man at the top! (the pope)
Another great post and I am glad to have run into you today.
Yes these days I have been hard on dispensationals because of their blind support of "Israil" which are antichrist but I need to show more mercy to a denomination that blessed my life with so many friends back in my 20's which was years ago.
I confess that as a young man in my early 20's when I was on my own I knew I had to find a venue where I could meet friends that would not cause me harm.
So I found a Baptist Church that I attended one Sunday morning. It didn't take long for the young people to find me.
It wasnt about doctrine at that age so much but about making friends and God blessed me and boy did he bless me in that decade with friends across that church and the next maga church that I attended.
My cup runneth over with friends back then.
I was in 7 weddings.
Then there is a time in life to grow up and pay attention to the details. "Doctrine"
When I mentioned to a friend in recent years to a problem I had with the dispensation doctrine he said to me "yes but didn' t you make a lot of friends at this church" ?
That was the perfect come back and he was right but truth and doctrine are important.
To your point is it possible for a person in a bad denomination or religous sect to be saved??
Of course there is. Calling and saving the Elect, his Elect is the sole responsibility of God Almighty. He will always find his people and uses us to spread his gospel. But with God, ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE.
For many are called but few are chosen.
winn, holy cow your getting some heat. How about this. . . One question. How does the gubmint get a science project into the public sector and why would they do that ? Then the pointed response becomes to install a "Face" to continue to receive ALL the revenue and . . . IPO baby. easy peasy
if i'm understanding your question accurately,
By funding it, like they did with Google et cet.
to make progress, develop useful stuff
My problem isn't the fact that the government funds private citizen's science projects and delivers the end results to us all to use. I love the internet! My problem is with them LYING to us about them, PRETENDING they are organic, private companies, and VIOLATING OUR RIGHTS via those companies, like they've done repeatedly throughout the last 15 years.
If they were all PROPERLY CLASSIFIED as Public Utility, they would be bound by the Constitution / Bill of Rights. It would be very much illegal to censor lawful speech or manipulate the search engine to bias towards one view or the other, for example
They are doing worse than lying. People like Bezos, Gates, Jobs & Zuckerburg are just faces, they didn't develop the tech, that was D.A.R.P.A etc. They are not rich, the $$ goes back to the black budget. Think of all the cash from Google. They are American Taxpayer companies, thats the point.
YES! Sorry I must have misread your comment, I thought you disagreed with me
This was written by a Gaurdian and Atlantic employee. Also a novelist, don't waste your time. Most around here could explain this topic in a paragraph, while submitting a stack of indictments for those involved in the crimes.