The church shooting was a psyop. 48 hour rule applies, but uh, there's just too many coincidences at this point.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🏳️ FALSE FLAG 👮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (91)
sorted by:
To be fair, it seems like all news glommed onto the same quote from one person.
And Trump just happens to post at the exact time stamp that has SPRAY and GUN in it?
17 injured? Trump posts at 1 hour and 17 minutes after the reported shooting?
How many coincidences until it's mathematically impossible?
OK. Let's just go with the premise that this is some sort of psyop.
Objective? Purpose (why)? Target?
Without those, it doesn't make much sense. So, wanna take a crack at those?
to further the national dialog about trans, ssri, therapists, ____ in society
A few objectives come to mind:
Wake up the people to their ability to do false flags.
Wake up the people to mental illness re: transgenders (the shooter regretted transitioning)
Hmmm....
But, they'd also have to consider the negatives, too, wouldn't they? The repetition of such incidents might trigger a small number to 'wake up', but I suspect it would affect a lot of people who observe such things towards depression, hopelessness, apathy, and eventually, disengagement.
Using trauma to 'wake people up' seems counter-productive to me. Something the black Hats would be happy to do, but the good guys?
Trauma is harmful. It's the basis for MK ultra-type programming.
In the meantime, another psyop up has been launched
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=Psyop&community=GreatAwakening
exactly^ we're watching a 'scripted movie'🍿
absolutely, more, I think, than we can imagine
I think what you are doing now is taking Q and the Q operation and transposing it into an area for which there is no control factor and no correction function. Trump gave put out comms on occasion in order to verify Q, but Q was the control factor. When misinterpretations arose from anons, Q was there to knock those on the head and redirect when required.
Q only mentioned 'mathematically impossible' in order to emphasize 'Q proofs' aka validation that the entity posting on the chans (Q) was valid and legitimate.
The problem here is, any of us can whip up a theory like oh, the Trump truth was comms because of <certain correlations or connections found with Q drops and time stamps or drop numbers>, but Q is not around to check that and either confirm or negate. No control factor.