Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® 21h
BREAKING: First Population-Wide Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers
Official government data from nearly 300,000 people tracked for 30 months show mRNA shots significantly increase the risk of overall cancer, breast
(twitter.com)
🚔 Crime & ClotShots 💸
Dr. Robert Malone says that the true reason there were just resignations at the CDC under RFK Jr. is that the ACIP Subcommittee on COVID vaccines was APPROVED to investigate safety and efficacy of the vaccines, "and they knew the gig was up." https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1962138284194214329
I know 4. 3 died. One is still fighting the return of a cancer cured 20 years earlier.
My buddy died from Colon and Liver cancer.
My buddy just found out he had liver cancer 2 wks ago, then last wk his colon. I dont expect him to last much longer. Yes jabbed once !
wtf. I’m sorry. My buddy died in 18months.
I'm surprised he's running with this. Study just doesn't support that IMO.
https://files.catbox.moe/ay6t84.pdf
Look at the age breakdowns. Just doesn't make sense to extrapolate this conclusion when the age ranges differ so greatly across cohorts.
EDIT: I'd encourage anyone down-dooting to read the study introduction look at the table on page 5, and pay especially close attention to the age breakdown.
If you think I'm missing something as far as what the study presents, please break it down for me.
A study is a study but when you work in Healthcare and see the carnage first hand, you don't need a study to tell you something tragic is happening to people under 45. Lots of stage 4 cancer in young people, on diagnosis, that shouldn't be happening. I had a father in his early 30s who was at the hospital for the birth of his child when he started having severe abdominal pains and had to go to the ER. He was dx'd with stage 4 cancer and had no precipitating symptoms before that time.😤😔
Agree to go with your firsthand observations, but mine are different.
The study is the observation point we both share. Would you agree that the study indicates what the posts are declaring? Would you be surprised to see significantly higher cancer rates in a group of significantly older people (say ~5 years)?
Nope, this nonsense is completely wrong. Correlation does not equal causation.
The reason more people are getting sick now is due to the amplified energies we are living in. In short, our negative emotional emanations are generating dis-ease in the body, faster and sooner than ever before.
On the flip side, our positive emotional emanations, joy, excitement, enthusiasm, inspiration are resulting in faster "good things" happening for humanity too.
McCullough has been controlled opposition since the beginning of COVID, just like Robert Malone. Both of these guys refuse to acknowledge, let alone discuss or debate the existence of boogeyman-viruses. They've both avoided every question as well as dozens of invitations to defend the mainstream narrative against those who have called it into question. That tells you all you need to know.
If the people who have proven boogeyman-viruses don't exist were wrong, people like McCullough and Malone would have shown how these people are wrong. They've had five years to do so and have never even made an attempt at this. Instead, they just say "those people aren't experts like us" and that hand-wave dismissal still seems to work on 90% of the population sadly.
The problem is, our "experts and authorities" in the medical community are the most brainwashed amongst us.
Their toeing the virus line in a limited hangout sort of way has been a concern for me as well. A virologist in manufacturing, like Micheal Yeardon can be forgiven for not tackling the blatant contradictions in his field, but researchers like Malone and McCullough can't be oblivious to them.
I think one needs to be wary of using the "correlation does not equal causation" as an argument. While true enough on its own, it doesn't warrant totally disregarding such evidence, because correlation is a necessary first step in showing causation.
Well I appreciate the sentiment and general agreement. This post got downvoted into oblivion!! hahaha
I will however disagree with you on your correlation/causation stance. It's a massive red herring and entirely misleading endeavor in both epidemiology and modern sciencetism. In fact, this "correlation equals causation" deception is how they maintain most of their lies. Let me explain.
Whatever this study found, we can safely assume the researchers set out with the objective of linking people who received the jab to increased risk of cancer. Right off the bat, we've got a heavy "confirmation bias" element in the mix. But this is tiny in comparison to the primary error.
Which is, how many people got the jab but have not yet been diagnosed with cancer in the last 30 months? Right? If the jab IS IN FACT THE CAUSE of these cancers, how is it that less than 1% of the people who received it have been diagnosed? Right? I know hundreds of people who got the jab. I can't think of any that have been diagnosed with cancer in the past 30 months. How is this possible?
Something like 70% of Americans got the jab. Let's just call that 250 million people using easy round numbers. And 248.5 million of this population have not been diagnosed with cancer. That's 99% of the total pool.
How can anybody not brainwashed and in their right mind then conclude the jab is the cause if 99% of people don't fit the ASSUMPTION?
I'll bet we could do a similar study on the 30% unjabbed population and arrive at very similar ratios. My guess, roughly 1% of this group has also been diagnosed with cancer in the last 30 months.
And just like that, the emperor has no clothes. I didn't need to spend a nickel to demonstrate the absurdity of the claim. The estimated number of cancer diagnosis in America is on pace to be roughly 2 million people. We don't need to even look back at previous years statistics to go any further with this investigation either. 2 million people is roughly half a percent of the total population (call it 350-375 million roughly).
Nobody in their right mind should even start barking up this tree if the jab-to-cancer ratio is anything less than 10%. Right?
I'm prepared to stand corrected if you find my logic flawed in any way. I realize I have a great advantage of not being a materialist, as we were all brainwashed to be, plus extensive knowledge and understanding about what ACTUALLY DOES CAUSE CANCERS that help me smell a rat more than most. But my analysis of this red herring scientism relied on neither advantage to arrive at these very obvious conclusions.
When it comes to our mainstream medicine, I can assure you, almost every study in existence relying upon the deceptive "correlation equals causation" trickery is all wrong too. This is because our mainstream experts and authorities are totally locked into their materialistic "Germs-Genes-Toxins" model of deception and are unable to think outside that box of lies.
i look forward to your thoughtful reply.
I do agree (and I upvoted you, FWIW). The only Jabbed people I know who later died of cancer is my mother, and three elders in my neighborhood, plus one teen with myocarditis. Is there correlation here? Certainly. Is it causative? I don't know. But I do suspect, largely, I will admit, because it confirms my bias.
With my mother, various neurological events were proximate and immediate with respect to her multiple jabs, which ups the value of the correlation. Still not conclusive, but it is pointing a direction, which was my only point: when you have a strong correlation, you are wise to look for more evidence. To dismiss it out of hand is also a trick of those who don't want you to know.
May you continue to survive the slings and arrows of the GAW!
Ha, you're an island in the desert my friend! :)
Ha, indeed! I'm an outsider and disrupter everywhere I go...
Sorry to hear that, bless her soul.
Good on you for not only seeing it, but actually admitting it. Believe me, I do "get it". I understand all the anger and blame aimed in this direction. We were all programmed to behave in exactly this way. This is the fundamental goal of the controlling cabal, what I call the "belief shapers". They've called this the "liberal agenda" for over 100 years now. It was singularly designed to generate "victim consciousness". When we feel like victims, we emanate blame while simultaneously giving our power away to those we have come to believe will bring justice. Welcome to GAW, eh? :)
Well stated and I wholeheartedly agree. However, I'm a big proponent of the null hypothesis as the key component of the scientific method. Any study I see without one -- which is the vast majority in medicine -- is not worth the paper it's printed on.
The short version of "what causes cancer", or any dis-ease for that matter, is sustained discordant feelings. Each type of legitimate cancer, as per the establishment's definition (excessive tissue growth, a.k.a tumors), is the result of a specific type of "discordant feeling". Our psyche (subconscious mind) is attempting to assist with resolution of said "discordant feeling" by interpreting our figurative thoughts, literally....in real time...and then generating temporary excess tissue in order to make the organ function more efficiently.
Put simply, "cancer" is not to be "gotten rid of", as the establishment has taught us to treat it, but rather the inharmonious thoughts and feelings are what needs to be addressed and eradicated. This is true of all dis-ease. In short, if you're not happy, you're not healthy.
Examples include: A "fear of dying" conflict triggers the psyche to generate excess lung tissue to become more efficient at uptaking more oxygen, as lack of oxygen is the quickest way to die. The psyche has no sense of time so if a person has this worry every day, eventually it results in overwhelming "lung cancer".
Likewise, an "I can't eat/accept/take-in conflict", you get cancer in the mouth. An "I can't swallow this situation conflict" produces throat-related cancers. An "I can't stomach this situation" produces stomach and liver cancers. An "I can't digest this situation" produces intestinal, liver and gall bladder cancers. An "I can't forgive/forget/release/let-go of this situation" leads to colon and rectal cancers. These are some of the more obvious types.
"Brain cancer" isn't an actual cancer as defined by the establishment. It's actually the natural "healing phase" result of someone overcoming a previous conflict. Likewise, 80% of diagnosed "breast cancers", known as "Intraductal breast cancer", isn't an "actual cancer" either. It's the reconstruction of the milk ducts following a woman's "worry/care/nurturing conflict" instincts for a loved one in need. This is why "breast cancer" exploded in the 1970s, when they redefined "what" cancer was.
Those are the very broad brushstrokes, but should be enough for you to consider the possibility I'm suggesting. Just think about all the fear, anger, blame, frustration, condemnation, vengeance, hatred, etc. flowing in the populace related to the entire COVID scamdemic, especially around the jabs, and you'll begin to see there are indeed other potential CORRELATIONS. And it shouldn't be lost on you, that these types of correlations are FORBIDDEN to discuss, let alone consider in modern, mainstream medical madness.
The establishment only allows for the "mind-body connection" with what they call DISORDERS. But it is forbidden within the establishment to suggest this is also the cause of all our DIS-EASES. One such chink in their fraudulent armor would blow the whole ballgame wide open.
Taking this one giant step further, the "creative mechanism" for all aspects of our lives, be it wealth, health, career, relationships, etc. is the most suppressed piece of wisdom in the world. The cause of our entire life experience is our personal BELIEFS, generated through our imagination via our thoughts and feelings. In short, IMAGINATION CREATES REALITY. Not "fantasizing", and not "day-dreaming". But imagination, which we're all doing constantly during our waking hours. What we FEEL TO BE TRUE*, becomes "true" for each one of us. In short, BELIEVING IS SEEING....not the other way around (seeing is believing).
That's a "step too far" for most people to accept. I get it. What I'm suggesting is the death knell for the victim consciousness we've all been deeply brainwashed into believing. As such, if this is the first time you've heard such a suggestion, I certainly don't expect you to agree with it.
Rather, contemplate all I've said here and consider the possibilities. I often argue with the materialistic "terrain theorists" on this topic. I tell them "if you BELIEVE tap water, or junk food, or 5G wifi, or GMOs or whatever are hazardous to your health, you are CREATING YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE as such. There's no denying the "results" they've experienced, be it changing dietary habits, or reluctantly being exposed to what they consider dangerous or unhealthy. They're being most truthful.
Combine it all and apply it to the COVID jab debacle and you've got a potent new TRIGGER for SUSTAINED DISCORDANT FEELINGS in the population, do we not? The controlling cabal is well aware of this. Which is why they're always presenting us information that elicits such feelings.
Now, in fairness to the topic at large, I do agree that anybody who experienced immediate problems (say within 24 hours) of the jab, certainly had a toxic reaction. I am in no way denying this, nor am I advocating for jabs at large. I'm simply saying the toxic ingredients in the jab do not somehow generate long-term dis-eases, like cancer, as suggested by materialists.
I also don't buy into the myocarditis story, but this is complicated to unwind. This part of the heart is related to an "overwhelmed conflict" often associated with some flavor of "self-devaluation" in the mix. It's not hard to imagine the teenagers that lived through COVID having these sorts of conflicts.
I'm a huge proponent of "the body knows best". As such, it defies imagination to think the body would "store" unknown or unwanted substances somewhere in the body, let alone the heart. I realize this is the entire "terrain theorist" belief-system however.
As with everything we're discussing, somebody would need to prove such a thing happens, which I have yet to see. The whole "self-assembling nano particles" fear-mongering story is giving the cabal outrageous levels of "credit". This is all nonsense, as are the stories of "spike proteins" and such. All of it is based on a wide variety of assumptions and misunderstandings that purveyors of such fear-mongering have been unwilling to examine.
In summary, RESISTANCE is what kills humans. All forms of fear and judgment are the prime causes of resistance. The day our medical establishment finally acknowledges this, marks its end as we know it. Because in its current state, it is perhaps the biggest offender when it comes to generating FEAR in its unwitting adherents. Outside of emergency/trauma care, our doctors are doing the exact opposite of what they should actually be doing. But alas, I realize we're still a long way from the masses understanding this.
The easiest way to come around to these "radical ideas" is to examine your own illnesses over the years. Look to the weeks/months preceding your symptoms and examine what sorts of emotional conflicts you were immersed within. Roughly 80% of all "dis-eases" are actually the "restoration phase" following the resolution of a conflict. The psyche ceases proliferating or removing tissue the moment we resolve our conflicts and gets to work on restoring homeostasis. This is when we "feel sick". Temperature rises, inflammation occurs, and bacteria are generated to either remove excess tissue (e.g. tuberculosis) or assist with rebuilding temporarily reduced tissue (e.g. ulcers, strep throat, bronchial colds/flus).
So try that all on for size and let me know what you think after you've had a chance to process it. All of it adds up to one unavoidable conclusion; we're each in total control of our own happiness, health and well-being. It's only when we outsource our own intellectual sovereignty to the cabal-endorsed "experts and authorities" that we get ourselves into trouble.
To bring all this around to my world -- stress upregulates cortisol, and cortisol kills, causing a host of dis-ease along the way.
Precisely. Your shift in understanding occurs when you recognize that excessive cortisol production is THE RESULT of ones SUSTAINED DISCORDANT FEELINGS.... a.k.a. RESISTANCE. Most pointedly, the chemical/hormone/enzyme or "genetic mutation" is NOT THE CAUSE of the dis-ease/disorder.
Our body is always talking to us. When we feel stress and anxiety, something FEELS wrong/bad/off in our lives. This is what needs to be addressed. If one cannot bring themselves to extricate themselves from this situation immediately, be it a job, relationship, circumstance, efforts must be made to see things in a different way.
Perhaps one of the best ways to think of all this is the flowing of a river. When we're happy, healthy and harmonious, we are "in the flow". When we slip into resistance, we are "fighting the current" or "clinging to the rocks", and this results in stress, anxiety, and all the other "out of the flow" emotions.
The fundamental esoteric teaching on this topic of "seemingly intractable circumstances" is to simply spend time each day "allowing everything to be as it is". In other words, to "call off the fight", stop trying, efforting, struggling to "fix it". This practice alone allows you to slip back into the flow, if only for those few minutes.
It is within this flow where the "solution" exists and ultimately arises. Perhaps first it occurs to you "I got myself into these circumstances, therefore I can get myself out of them". This realization alone can bring tremendous RELIEF which is what anybody struggling with stress and anxiety is ultimately looking for. You once again feel EMPOWERED.
The very simple way to look at all this is: If you want to feel good (which is what we all want), you first have to choose to feel good. This means "calling off the fight" ultimately.
The psyche, regulator of all our bodily processes, totally unaware of "time", will in turn stop generating excess cortisol in the periods you are "allowing everything to be as it is". The psyche is producing the excess cortisol to assist you, quite literally, with FIGHTING your perceived literal or figurative adversary. It has a very primitive outlook in this sense, effectively "basic survival" awareness.
Make sense? Questions?
No questions yet. Need to digest.
Referring back to what you first posted about the "belief shapers." Came across this article about the impossibility of the mRNA platform, Malone's claim to fame. Thought you might find it interesting.