Not a death cult, but here's a comment I made yesterday on a post about Operation Warp Speed:
"I don't underestimate that at all. I didn't watch the vid though, didn't need to and I never heard of the guy anyway. We could play ping pong videos if you want. I'll find one to counter yours, and there we go (not really, just making a point).
"What Joe M is claiming here would mean that Trump is just as corrupt and his reach into a secret apparatus that fooled us all would equal anything the deep state has. Please consider this because I am only being logical.
"Want another one? There's the No Name done in 30 theory. How would you like to live in a country where a secret government cabal can disappear a sitting US Senator and after a secret trial, execute him while lying to the public about his cause of death? North Korea? China? The USSR? Who would do such a thing? Oh, the "White Hats"? Really?
"The things some people on our own side accuse Trump of doing make Soros and Hillary look normal by comparison."
Law of War permits secret tribunals and executions for cause. It must be done by the book and thoroughly documented, but no requirement to make public while doing it. This is the nature of a Republic, you select someone to do violence on your behalf; and doing it to enemies of the Republic is not only expected, but their duty. This is LAW enforcement. Note that there is circumstantial evidence of this happening under Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Eisenhower, Carter, Nixon, and Reagan in addition to under Trump I and Biden.
Those who complain about this mistake our Republic for a Democracy. This is why the cabal fears Republics. There are assigned law enforcers with the duty to do LAW enforcement (Executive Branch backed by Republic military), and they don't need to ask for a vote on it.
There is a good case to be made that tribunals and executions should be revealed to the public some time after operations are concluded, but it is possible that "operations" started with the stolen 1824 election and are ongoing ever since.
Note that Obama appears to have setup secret courts for in absentia convictions and death sentences for people declared to be "enemies of the state" presumed to be used under the HRC regime. Everyone on this site likely would have been executed by now without the Republic military intervening. In this reality it does sometimes come down to "execute your enemy before they execute you", preferably through a lawful process, but done anyway if that path is denied.
Is the "US Congress", composed of agents of a foreign power, expected to vote on a Declaration of War against their paymasters when there is obvious and indisputable evidence of payments made and received?
And if their paymasters are not a single foreign nation, then can Congress issue a Declaration of War on a particular set of individuals or group, such as Swiss-based bankers who operate outside of all laws and treaties, including all Swiss laws themselves?
Being "at war" or a "state of war" obligates a Republic President to take all necessary actions to defend the Republic. It is his duty per Article II. Failure to do so is impeachable and cause to convict and remove in Senate. One does not "rollover and do nothing" unless the President is ALSO a foreign agent.
Half of the premise: "You can't do that because it is unDemocratic" is correct. However, Republics operate in unDemocratic ways precisely because it ensures their survival. We swerved from a "pure Republic" long ago, but Reconstituting the Republic requires "violence" due to a long period of non-LAW enforcement. "Minimization of violence" directed at actual lawbreakers instead of "mass violence" in a Revolution against the whole gov't is the preferred reality. But "violence" is unavoidable, and should be expected as a citizen of the Republic.
Anyone wishing to live a non-violent "Democracy" without any individual rights is strongly encouraged to move to Eastern Canada since Western Canada will soon be joining this Republic.
After the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was leaving Independence Hall when a woman (traditionally identified as Mrs. Elizabeth Willing Powel, a prominent Philadelphia socialite) asked him:
“Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?”
Franklin replied:“A republic—if you can keep it.”
How do we keep our republic? By boldly exercising the powers vested in the Executive Branch to maintain the republic!
Not a death cult, but here's a comment I made yesterday on a post about Operation Warp Speed:
"I don't underestimate that at all. I didn't watch the vid though, didn't need to and I never heard of the guy anyway. We could play ping pong videos if you want. I'll find one to counter yours, and there we go (not really, just making a point).
"What Joe M is claiming here would mean that Trump is just as corrupt and his reach into a secret apparatus that fooled us all would equal anything the deep state has. Please consider this because I am only being logical.
"Want another one? There's the No Name done in 30 theory. How would you like to live in a country where a secret government cabal can disappear a sitting US Senator and after a secret trial, execute him while lying to the public about his cause of death? North Korea? China? The USSR? Who would do such a thing? Oh, the "White Hats"? Really?
"The things some people on our own side accuse Trump of doing make Soros and Hillary look normal by comparison."
Law of War permits secret tribunals and executions for cause. It must be done by the book and thoroughly documented, but no requirement to make public while doing it. This is the nature of a Republic, you select someone to do violence on your behalf; and doing it to enemies of the Republic is not only expected, but their duty. This is LAW enforcement. Note that there is circumstantial evidence of this happening under Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Eisenhower, Carter, Nixon, and Reagan in addition to under Trump I and Biden.
Those who complain about this mistake our Republic for a Democracy. This is why the cabal fears Republics. There are assigned law enforcers with the duty to do LAW enforcement (Executive Branch backed by Republic military), and they don't need to ask for a vote on it.
There is a good case to be made that tribunals and executions should be revealed to the public some time after operations are concluded, but it is possible that "operations" started with the stolen 1824 election and are ongoing ever since.
Was the war you refer to, the one needed to permit secret executions, declared by the United States Congress?
If so, when was this declaration of war made, and against whom, and for what reason?
Note that Obama appears to have setup secret courts for in absentia convictions and death sentences for people declared to be "enemies of the state" presumed to be used under the HRC regime. Everyone on this site likely would have been executed by now without the Republic military intervening. In this reality it does sometimes come down to "execute your enemy before they execute you", preferably through a lawful process, but done anyway if that path is denied.
Is the "US Congress", composed of agents of a foreign power, expected to vote on a Declaration of War against their paymasters when there is obvious and indisputable evidence of payments made and received?
And if their paymasters are not a single foreign nation, then can Congress issue a Declaration of War on a particular set of individuals or group, such as Swiss-based bankers who operate outside of all laws and treaties, including all Swiss laws themselves?
Being "at war" or a "state of war" obligates a Republic President to take all necessary actions to defend the Republic. It is his duty per Article II. Failure to do so is impeachable and cause to convict and remove in Senate. One does not "rollover and do nothing" unless the President is ALSO a foreign agent.
Well there you go.
Half of the premise: "You can't do that because it is unDemocratic" is correct. However, Republics operate in unDemocratic ways precisely because it ensures their survival. We swerved from a "pure Republic" long ago, but Reconstituting the Republic requires "violence" due to a long period of non-LAW enforcement. "Minimization of violence" directed at actual lawbreakers instead of "mass violence" in a Revolution against the whole gov't is the preferred reality. But "violence" is unavoidable, and should be expected as a citizen of the Republic.
Anyone wishing to live a non-violent "Democracy" without any individual rights is strongly encouraged to move to Eastern Canada since Western Canada will soon be joining this Republic.
Thanks for your thoughts on being a republic!
After the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was leaving Independence Hall when a woman (traditionally identified as Mrs. Elizabeth Willing Powel, a prominent Philadelphia socialite) asked him:
“Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?”
Franklin replied:“A republic—if you can keep it.”
How do we keep our republic? By boldly exercising the powers vested in the Executive Branch to maintain the republic!