This seems to be part of the plan all along. Why? Who has the most believability? The victims or the Government? If the DOJ started naming names it would be called a witch-hunt, but if the victims start naming names en masse, there will be believability and much anger. Anger we have or seen before.
TO compile?!? Better if they documented it at the time, even a diary or letters, or stored in a safe place with a dead-man's switch.
Where did the list of the victims come from? just asking
Look what a "victim" did to Gorsuch! Look what Jean Carroll did to Trump!
Who is to say there is not a controlled plant among them? Or they compare notes and mutually modify their memories due to suggestion? just saying . . .
Yes the true victims should name names and the perps prosecuted. But just saying too . . .
Watching all these women speak seems legitimate to me. I could be wrong.
Here is something we can look for....
For a long time, many of the Epstein files that have been released have been heavily redacted "to protect the victims." If these are truly the victims, they could say, "We want all of this out there; we don't need to be protected because we have gone public now. Unredact it all." If these victims do this, then the DOJ can no longer hide behind the excuse of "protecting the victims" when, in fact, they have been protecting the perpetrators all along.
My personal opinion on Trump's perspective is that he is employing the 'briar patch' technique.
The phrase "rabbit in the briar patch" likely refers to the classic folktale from the Uncle Remus stories, particularly the "Brer Rabbit and the Tar Baby" tale, where Brer Rabbit, a trickster character, outsmarts his adversaries by begging not to be thrown into the briar patch—his natural habitat where he thrives. When his enemies, like Brer Fox, throw him into the briar patch thinking it will harm him, Brer Rabbit escapes easily, saying, "I was born and bred in the briar patch!" The phrase symbolizes someone cleverly manipulating a situation to their advantage by appearing vulnerable or distressed.
I saw an interview of Juliette Bryant with Blaire White. I think she is batshit insane. She had the weirdest reactions to questions. If there is a plant, it’s her.
...the survivors did not commit suicide...
These are very brave women to be doing this. Very brave.
YES! May God Protect them! 🙏🤍
Everyone involved be doing a Bill Clinton “ 👀”
🤣😂🤣
Hell yes Getter Done
Noticing that Fox is not covering this but MSNBC, CNN and BBC are.
I am tired of saying this ad nauseam.
If Trump did anything wrong this would have been brought out in 2015 when he wanted to run.
Or at the very least during his Presidency the first time.
This was on my bingo card. I hope it goes well.
Additional Sauce:
PANIC in DC As Epstein Victims Speak LIVE Right Now from US Capitol | Trump LIVE in Oval Office Soon
HAPPENING NOW: EPSTEIN VICTIMS SPEAK
EPSTEIN VICTIM DEMANDS ACCOUNTABILITY
HALEY ROBSON SPEAKS OUT
"PROTECT THE VULNERABLE NOT THE POWERFUL!"
Represented by Hillary Clinton's best friend. The list will be Trump, Trump Trump.
This seems to be part of the plan all along. Why? Who has the most believability? The victims or the Government? If the DOJ started naming names it would be called a witch-hunt, but if the victims start naming names en masse, there will be believability and much anger. Anger we have or seen before.
TO compile?!? Better if they documented it at the time, even a diary or letters, or stored in a safe place with a dead-man's switch.
Where did the list of the victims come from? just asking
Look what a "victim" did to Gorsuch! Look what Jean Carroll did to Trump!
Who is to say there is not a controlled plant among them? Or they compare notes and mutually modify their memories due to suggestion? just saying . . .
Yes the true victims should name names and the perps prosecuted. But just saying too . . .
Discerning is important for sure.
Watching all these women speak seems legitimate to me. I could be wrong.
Here is something we can look for....
For a long time, many of the Epstein files that have been released have been heavily redacted "to protect the victims." If these are truly the victims, they could say, "We want all of this out there; we don't need to be protected because we have gone public now. Unredact it all." If these victims do this, then the DOJ can no longer hide behind the excuse of "protecting the victims" when, in fact, they have been protecting the perpetrators all along.
My personal opinion on Trump's perspective is that he is employing the 'briar patch' technique.
YES! And the tar baby? HA!
The dems are embracing the tar baby!
Ha! I added additional thoughts to my previous comment as well. Be sure to check that out too. Have a great day u/ArmyLady! 👈🏻
U 2 Maga Patriot!!
u/#trumpflag
I saw an interview of Juliette Bryant with Blaire White. I think she is batshit insane. She had the weirdest reactions to questions. If there is a plant, it’s her.