he states in no unclear terms that this video from Cuomo is a result of him having met JFK Jr! ok, ok, so anyone can say this. well look at this guys account and who follows him...PapiTrumpo! and see others.
I have lots of confidence that this guy isn't trolling and knows what's up. a question has been asked of him by @usvsthem10 which will be interesting to see if there's a response
call it hopium or whatever you like but this more than ever has me giddy about my strong belief that JFK Jr is still alive whether he's Q or part of Q or whatever
so... are you a flat-earther? you should go watch some SciManDan on youtube. But this ones always a quick solid proof: "Triangles. If you walk 10,000 kilometers straight along the earth's surface, turn 90 degrees to your right, walk 10,000 kilometers more, turn right again and walk another 10,000 kilometers, you'll be back to where you started, having successfully made a triangle with three 90 degree angles. As any geometry student can tell you, this is impossible on a flat surface." - but the list goes on and on - proven for thousands of years now.
I'm simply acknowledging that I don't and can't know and don't feel anyone else can KNOW. that being said, if certain and many proofs lead in a certain direction than a theory becomes more and more plausible. I have not landed on a solid theory about the earth being flat, triangle, round, irregular, etc. there are lots of proofs tending toward various philosophies and I think that anyone talking in absolute terms about anything (Earth, vaccines, 9/11, moon landing, chemtrails, etc) without the humility to realize none of us truly know anything 100%, is a muppet
It simply isn’t ok to question the shape of the earth nowadays - yes we KNOW it’s an oblate spheroid… but oh so slightly not perfect because we spin. To question this proven fact is to be a muppet or as smart as one. Anyone with half an education can simply observe this and with just a bit more solid education one can prove it many many ways. This is no longer theoretical. Birds might not be real though :)
well I guess graduating summa cum laude in engineering with plenty of physics classes was a farce :) too many questions for me to buy that we're spinning at over 1,000 mph and we don't feel any lifting g force or there's not an insane wind created from the atmosphere above us that experiences a different gravitational force being further away from the center and surface of the earth. who knows. you and I will never solve this and more importantly we don't need to
So this is like graduating high-school with honors and not being able to read and write, ya? So through all of your apparent schooling you never really grasped the size of the planet, huh? 1000mph you wouldn't feel as its relative - we're moving with it and it doesn't create enough force to escape gravity - for that you'd have to be going over 17k mph. Then pull in relative speeds and the atmosphere moving right along with us and indeed you would feel no wind; although with Coriolis effect is there really no wind? I have to believe either you didn't graduate with an engineering degree at all or you're trolling. Either way - you need to go back to school, FLERF
You’re claiming to have graduated with a degree in engineering and you think calculating g of the twin towers is impressive? Dude, seriously, my first year physics students in HIGH SCHOOL could do it, the academic level, not the AP. Geez, and you didn’t know that eclipses involved earth, moon, and sun.
where did I claim that "calculating g of the twin towers" was impressive? and what does that statement even mean? "g" of the twin towers. they seem to have fell at virtual free fall, 9.82 m/s^2 or whatever they tell us, but I never felt the need to do a lab study on it. it's apparent. and Bldg 7 couldn't be more obvious. no calculating needed and in case you missed the NIST report by "engineers" they managed to come up with some other calcs, which is only further proof that enginnering isn't even a perfect science because the engineer can add in resistances, etc that may not actually be there
how is that? lunar eclipse involves the sun and the moon, no ? nothing to do with the earth's projection. if we were to agree that this proves the sun and moon are rounded, how would that prove the earth is?
The earth is between the sun and the moon during a lunar eclipse. It is the CURVED shadow of the earth that causes the moon to become darkened during an eclipse. It’s always a CURVED shadow thus proving that earth is round.
ok, I'm clearly mistaken in terms of lunar eclipse being defined as involving the earth getting between the sun and the moon, so apologies there for thinking of a solar eclipse, but I actually can't agree to that the shadow is necessarily caused by the earth, I can agree that's what we've been told and that it may be the case but if you truly ask yourself what we KNOW 100% and what we can KNOW 100% we should begin to realize none (or very few) of us really know much, if anything, at all
link to this video: https://x.com/MilaLovesJoe/status/1964765766764630354
then link to this or just scroll down until you read the comment from "Red" @Datification
https://x.com/Datification/status/1964813972588438006
he states in no unclear terms that this video from Cuomo is a result of him having met JFK Jr! ok, ok, so anyone can say this. well look at this guys account and who follows him...PapiTrumpo! and see others.
I have lots of confidence that this guy isn't trolling and knows what's up. a question has been asked of him by @usvsthem10 which will be interesting to see if there's a response
call it hopium or whatever you like but this more than ever has me giddy about my strong belief that JFK Jr is still alive whether he's Q or part of Q or whatever
Is the name Red short for ‘Retired Extremely Dangerous”? Interesting photo, Trump’s eye and JFK jr inside the eye.
yes I picked up on that image too
Yes! Someone who was in MI?
I've followed this account for a while. It's being shadow banned..
interesting. interesting enough Joy, I'm apparently being shadow banned on GAW right now...do you still see my post ?
Yes...
And yet one of the first posts appears to be a meme in support of flat-earth??? as a 12 year old girl would say, "that's a bit sus"
I'm looks like he identifies flat earth as a psyop ...look at meme again fren
please do tell us how you KNOW for sure the earth is round/sphere?
so... are you a flat-earther? you should go watch some SciManDan on youtube. But this ones always a quick solid proof: "Triangles. If you walk 10,000 kilometers straight along the earth's surface, turn 90 degrees to your right, walk 10,000 kilometers more, turn right again and walk another 10,000 kilometers, you'll be back to where you started, having successfully made a triangle with three 90 degree angles. As any geometry student can tell you, this is impossible on a flat surface." - but the list goes on and on - proven for thousands of years now.
I'm simply acknowledging that I don't and can't know and don't feel anyone else can KNOW. that being said, if certain and many proofs lead in a certain direction than a theory becomes more and more plausible. I have not landed on a solid theory about the earth being flat, triangle, round, irregular, etc. there are lots of proofs tending toward various philosophies and I think that anyone talking in absolute terms about anything (Earth, vaccines, 9/11, moon landing, chemtrails, etc) without the humility to realize none of us truly know anything 100%, is a muppet
It simply isn’t ok to question the shape of the earth nowadays - yes we KNOW it’s an oblate spheroid… but oh so slightly not perfect because we spin. To question this proven fact is to be a muppet or as smart as one. Anyone with half an education can simply observe this and with just a bit more solid education one can prove it many many ways. This is no longer theoretical. Birds might not be real though :)
well I guess graduating summa cum laude in engineering with plenty of physics classes was a farce :) too many questions for me to buy that we're spinning at over 1,000 mph and we don't feel any lifting g force or there's not an insane wind created from the atmosphere above us that experiences a different gravitational force being further away from the center and surface of the earth. who knows. you and I will never solve this and more importantly we don't need to
So this is like graduating high-school with honors and not being able to read and write, ya? So through all of your apparent schooling you never really grasped the size of the planet, huh? 1000mph you wouldn't feel as its relative - we're moving with it and it doesn't create enough force to escape gravity - for that you'd have to be going over 17k mph. Then pull in relative speeds and the atmosphere moving right along with us and indeed you would feel no wind; although with Coriolis effect is there really no wind? I have to believe either you didn't graduate with an engineering degree at all or you're trolling. Either way - you need to go back to school, FLERF
you are regurgitating what they TAUGHT you. think for yourself and realize what they taught us needs to be proven. or stay normie and don't
best wishes, and I mean this sincerely
OP is a freakin liar.
You’re claiming to have graduated with a degree in engineering and you think calculating g of the twin towers is impressive? Dude, seriously, my first year physics students in HIGH SCHOOL could do it, the academic level, not the AP. Geez, and you didn’t know that eclipses involved earth, moon, and sun.
where did I claim that "calculating g of the twin towers" was impressive? and what does that statement even mean? "g" of the twin towers. they seem to have fell at virtual free fall, 9.82 m/s^2 or whatever they tell us, but I never felt the need to do a lab study on it. it's apparent. and Bldg 7 couldn't be more obvious. no calculating needed and in case you missed the NIST report by "engineers" they managed to come up with some other calcs, which is only further proof that enginnering isn't even a perfect science because the engineer can add in resistances, etc that may not actually be there
https://www.youtube.com/@SciManDan
Lunar eclipses illustrate that the earth is round.
how is that? lunar eclipse involves the sun and the moon, no ? nothing to do with the earth's projection. if we were to agree that this proves the sun and moon are rounded, how would that prove the earth is?
The earth is between the sun and the moon during a lunar eclipse. It is the CURVED shadow of the earth that causes the moon to become darkened during an eclipse. It’s always a CURVED shadow thus proving that earth is round.
Do you agree that the shadow of the earth is what causes the moon to become darkened during a lunar eclipse?
ok, I'm clearly mistaken in terms of lunar eclipse being defined as involving the earth getting between the sun and the moon, so apologies there for thinking of a solar eclipse, but I actually can't agree to that the shadow is necessarily caused by the earth, I can agree that's what we've been told and that it may be the case but if you truly ask yourself what we KNOW 100% and what we can KNOW 100% we should begin to realize none (or very few) of us really know much, if anything, at all
So what other large round structure between the sun and moon could possibly be responsible for the shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse?
I'm not here to answer questions, just ask them :)