so... are you a flat-earther? you should go watch some SciManDan on youtube. But this ones always a quick solid proof: "Triangles. If you walk 10,000 kilometers straight along the earth's surface, turn 90 degrees to your right, walk 10,000 kilometers more, turn right again and walk another 10,000 kilometers, you'll be back to where you started, having successfully made a triangle with three 90 degree angles. As any geometry student can tell you, this is impossible on a flat surface." - but the list goes on and on - proven for thousands of years now.
I'm simply acknowledging that I don't and can't know and don't feel anyone else can KNOW. that being said, if certain and many proofs lead in a certain direction than a theory becomes more and more plausible. I have not landed on a solid theory about the earth being flat, triangle, round, irregular, etc. there are lots of proofs tending toward various philosophies and I think that anyone talking in absolute terms about anything (Earth, vaccines, 9/11, moon landing, chemtrails, etc) without the humility to realize none of us truly know anything 100%, is a muppet
It simply isn’t ok to question the shape of the earth nowadays - yes we KNOW it’s an oblate spheroid… but oh so slightly not perfect because we spin. To question this proven fact is to be a muppet or as smart as one. Anyone with half an education can simply observe this and with just a bit more solid education one can prove it many many ways. This is no longer theoretical. Birds might not be real though :)
well I guess graduating summa cum laude in engineering with plenty of physics classes was a farce :) too many questions for me to buy that we're spinning at over 1,000 mph and we don't feel any lifting g force or there's not an insane wind created from the atmosphere above us that experiences a different gravitational force being further away from the center and surface of the earth. who knows. you and I will never solve this and more importantly we don't need to
how is that? lunar eclipse involves the sun and the moon, no ? nothing to do with the earth's projection. if we were to agree that this proves the sun and moon are rounded, how would that prove the earth is?
The earth is between the sun and the moon during a lunar eclipse. It is the CURVED shadow of the earth that causes the moon to become darkened during an eclipse. It’s always a CURVED shadow thus proving that earth is round.
ok, I'm clearly mistaken in terms of lunar eclipse being defined as involving the earth getting between the sun and the moon, so apologies there for thinking of a solar eclipse, but I actually can't agree to that the shadow is necessarily caused by the earth, I can agree that's what we've been told and that it may be the case but if you truly ask yourself what we KNOW 100% and what we can KNOW 100% we should begin to realize none (or very few) of us really know much, if anything, at all
I'm looks like he identifies flat earth as a psyop ...look at meme again fren
please do tell us how you KNOW for sure the earth is round/sphere?
so... are you a flat-earther? you should go watch some SciManDan on youtube. But this ones always a quick solid proof: "Triangles. If you walk 10,000 kilometers straight along the earth's surface, turn 90 degrees to your right, walk 10,000 kilometers more, turn right again and walk another 10,000 kilometers, you'll be back to where you started, having successfully made a triangle with three 90 degree angles. As any geometry student can tell you, this is impossible on a flat surface." - but the list goes on and on - proven for thousands of years now.
I'm simply acknowledging that I don't and can't know and don't feel anyone else can KNOW. that being said, if certain and many proofs lead in a certain direction than a theory becomes more and more plausible. I have not landed on a solid theory about the earth being flat, triangle, round, irregular, etc. there are lots of proofs tending toward various philosophies and I think that anyone talking in absolute terms about anything (Earth, vaccines, 9/11, moon landing, chemtrails, etc) without the humility to realize none of us truly know anything 100%, is a muppet
It simply isn’t ok to question the shape of the earth nowadays - yes we KNOW it’s an oblate spheroid… but oh so slightly not perfect because we spin. To question this proven fact is to be a muppet or as smart as one. Anyone with half an education can simply observe this and with just a bit more solid education one can prove it many many ways. This is no longer theoretical. Birds might not be real though :)
well I guess graduating summa cum laude in engineering with plenty of physics classes was a farce :) too many questions for me to buy that we're spinning at over 1,000 mph and we don't feel any lifting g force or there's not an insane wind created from the atmosphere above us that experiences a different gravitational force being further away from the center and surface of the earth. who knows. you and I will never solve this and more importantly we don't need to
Lunar eclipses illustrate that the earth is round.
how is that? lunar eclipse involves the sun and the moon, no ? nothing to do with the earth's projection. if we were to agree that this proves the sun and moon are rounded, how would that prove the earth is?
The earth is between the sun and the moon during a lunar eclipse. It is the CURVED shadow of the earth that causes the moon to become darkened during an eclipse. It’s always a CURVED shadow thus proving that earth is round.
Do you agree that the shadow of the earth is what causes the moon to become darkened during a lunar eclipse?
ok, I'm clearly mistaken in terms of lunar eclipse being defined as involving the earth getting between the sun and the moon, so apologies there for thinking of a solar eclipse, but I actually can't agree to that the shadow is necessarily caused by the earth, I can agree that's what we've been told and that it may be the case but if you truly ask yourself what we KNOW 100% and what we can KNOW 100% we should begin to realize none (or very few) of us really know much, if anything, at all