-u/qfrost
6 is way ahead. I liked 7 (WRP) but it gets less likely as details get added. Nothing makes sense unless there is a powerful reason for the killing (see Pelican Brief). Kirk just looking into Israel isn't still powerful enough.
However, if Kirk had been tapped by Trump to begin a process, with the previously announced series of campus events, where Kirk could be point man for exposure of flaws in Israel's position (similar to other private folks like Lindell as point men for other moves), that would increase the likelihood that rogue Mossad would find it useful to have a quick operation.
For now, both America and the powerful organizers of the killer must temporarily uphold the patsy story while their backroom new negotiation is worked out. The backroom is also watching the public rhetoric as it unfolds (optics). The killers' goal is to redirect Trump's past intent to work through Kirk to accomplish some new goal (presumably exposure of certain Israeli intelligence, and perhaps finally the true "Israel for last"). Trump's goal is, while rerouting his resources in accord with whatever his plan B was, to indicate NCSWIC and no change in the forward movement of what Kirk hinted was coming. The negotiation is over whether plan B can be adjusted before it materializes, and Trump for his part is likely to make a concession or two from his own gut even while upholding 95% of the plan B. This is true whomever the killers are, because Trump knows with high certainty who they are and whether he hates them or is tied to them he must operate with the best hope for successful goals in spite of the killers' move, which requires situational judgment. We pray for Trump's team to make the right decisions in Jesus's name.
If there was a point where Trump's people could foresee the killing and had to make an instant decision whether to permit it or not, the default would be "not" because one doesn't vitiate one's own intel to stop a plot that that intel reveals unless one is ready for the greater backlash of that choice. But interrupting the plot would be seriously considered (with risk of being wrong), and capitalizing upon the plot would also be weighed (with hope of being wrong). Followup indicates that whether or not they had that opportunity to evaluate, their plans to galvanize 95% of America have been assisted by this event better than most any other event we have seen. For Trump, this is a moment greater than the King or Floyd moments. So we could understand a wartime general making the call to let the assassination proceed if it succeeds and to use it for good, rather than to intervene and risk the killers doing something much worse (knowing their power and organization).
So to me the only way to make sense is if Kirk and Trump privately had much bigger plans than we knew, and the most likely one desirous of interrupting those plans in exactly this way is rogue Mossad; and then the Trump team (i.e. the remnant of Q) would implement the NCSWIC protocol for 95% of their plan B. What Trump is actually doing is (1) doubling down on Americans privately defunding radicals via appealing to fair-minded employers of those radicals to use their contractual power to prevent employees from reflecting badly on their brand; (2) illustrating this by doing the same in spades for government employees and for foreign nationals with whom the government operates; (3) encouraging international unity (wow!); (4) testing the public's acceptance of the foreign-actor theory via new media (Patel, Carlson, Flynn) which would naturally be part of plan B to expose the assassin team; (5) oh yeah, Stephen Miller announcing that we will now "dismantle the radical left", in Kirk's name no less. This matches the theory.
Bibi as further evidence: I respect Netanyahu, but he is at least as tightly constrained in his options now as ever. If he had a team propose a Kirk assassination and he could not reveal that, that would be perfectly consistent with his Fox interview, which constituted a nondenial. When asked a prepared question about Israeli involvement with 2 minutes to answer, he did not work in an explicit statement of denial of responsibility, but merely said the theory was insane and rapidly deflected to connect the Holocaust and the blood libel and more. That was disappointing, but it's also the best that he could do on short notice if the theory is correct. I can usually triangulate him, and he's usually in command, but this week he looks like a man who suddenly lacks full control of the narrative. Unlike Trump.
That theory would indicate: (1) Exposure of rogue Mossad will continue under a newly appointed point man; (2) Optics about the government's position about foreign actors will continue and will need to be scrutinized exactly; (3) Netanyahu will continue to speak well of Kirk but not to be explicit about the suspicions Kirk had of him; (4) American structures will arise, apparently organically, that carry on the TPUSA mission, not just to dismantle radicalism and restore the constitutional republic, but also to unite the generation of youth now and indefinitely upon a core American morality that changes the status quo of distributed irresponsibility.
If Theory 6 is accurate, it will be tested daily by the appearance of these markers.
One matter Trump does not control is the American spirit, which is in God's hands. We have prayed for not just awakening but revival for years, but only God can cause people to move from all-nighter vigils to outpourings of spiritual power with prophetic declaration, apostolic appointment, and prayer warfare. Trump's team has hoped and prayed that this will occur but only God can decide if our nation has strayed too far for this revival. But I can encourage you to take every step now, not just for Charlie, but for Jesus Christ Charlie's hero, to participate in the revival that may yet occur. Soften your spirit, ask God through the universe to reveal new steps, release old holdbacks that you've sought for personally controlled safety, step out in trust that God will reward your trust, speak your mind while open to expand your mind, and participate with God in the revival of your conscience and spiritual life that balances the imbalanced and harmonizes you and your universe. I don't know enough about Charlie but I feel confident he would have said that accepting the righteousness and eternal life that Jesus earned and offers to you as a free gift is always the first step toward the American revival we all seek.
571
Q!UW.yye1fxo 01/21/2018 14:25:40 ID: @Jack, MZ, ES, JB, EM, SH, MSM, etc. Do you know that we know? Do you know that we see all? Do you know that we hear all? FEAR the STORM. NOBODY PLAYING THE GAME GETS A FREE PASS. NOBODY. Q 529
Q!UW.yye1fxo 01/13/2018 23:16:59 ID:
Be READY. MSM coming - BIG WAY. We see all. We hear all. FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT. CONSPIRACY push coming. MSM LOST CONTROL. D LOST SLAVE GRIP. D LOST CENTER VOTERS. LIBS are MINORITY. MSM PROJECTS AS BIG MOVEMENT. FAKE NEWS. 4-6% LOST FOREVER. HELLO GEORGE. Q
150
Q!ITPb.qbhqo 11/13/2017 13:04:46 ID: /lc4nimE
Distress cal[L]s to others will [d]o you/family no good at this stage. We know whe[R]e you/the family are at all times and can hear you breathing. Q
u/#q571
u/#q529
u/#q150
Ill go with option 17: None of the above or below. Divine fate is at play. I dont think either side fully knows or is able to predict their own IRT moves nor future moves with near certain accuracy. All they know is their moves will be counted. The clock stops. Turn the clock back on for the next turn and the other player makes their move.
IMO the whole concept of Looking Glass is misinterpreted as 5G info warfare when in fact it is vague glimpse of fated actions before they take place. A blurry Viewmaster slide of things that are, things that were, and things that have not yet come to pass.
In hindsight, Q should've just told us the metaphor for Galadriel's Mirror.
Updoot for magic number #17.
The 'REAL Great Awakening is a Spiritual one.
“Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.” ― William Penn
YES! 🙌
What are they doing? Lounging on a beach on the opposite side of the world.
Watch for a whitehat counter by 17SEP. There appears to have been one 6 days after 13JUL on 19JUL. I will post details on that one once we get another counter that can be deciphered for 10SEP event. The public reporting may not be what it actually is.
Noted.
Evidence supporting above, incomplete:
2025-09-13 14:50 EDT: Trump TS: TikTok official_elly_may on "Charlie Kirk Act" as restoration of Smith-Mundt Act, including influencers as media.
Ryan Grim: Netanyahu now claims, offering zero evidence, that Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a combination of “radical Islamists and ultra-progressives.”
16:50: Evidence from u/ Neo1, mostly indirect, with interesting updates about Shapiro. Mirror.
17:10: Laura Loomer: Don't be surprised if the shooter is never found.
09-15 00:15: Bigger. Does unprecedented dignified transfer on Air Force Two, plus reference to "Valhalla", indicate Kirk secretly worked for the US government? Mirror.
Flynn: The Globalists Killed Charlie Kirk & they have names .... They are Soros, Obama, Clinton, Biden, Gates, Schwab, Macron, Starmer, Merz .... Mirror.
Nunes: Trying to kill conservatives .... Was done by my former colleagues in Congress. It was also done and supported by a very sophisticated organization .... Not just Soros. Mirror.
Netanyahu transcript on Fox.
Shadow of Ezra: Netanyahu was suddenly rushed to the government building in Jerusalem after a public appearance. At the event, he admitted he had to leave immediately but refused to elaborate on the reason.
08:45: Big. Utah arrest of Nasirs, Pakistani, suddenly making Netanyahu's mention of Islam credible.
This place is called the great awakening. Willingly following a survey is like asking for the blue pill. Stop hitting your snooze button.
Survey? I select from what resonates with my autodidact thought and use it to build out my foundation and you object to my use of quotation? Would you think Isaiah was blue-pilled because he decided to rely on quoting Micah to get his book going?
Sorry for assuming. I got the impression that you were siding with #6 because it was leading the survey. It's all good.