It’s been over 72 hours (72 hour rule) now and here’s my theory on the “assassination” of Charlie Kirk on Wednesday, 9/10/2025. I come to this conclusion after doing research through various sources and what Q has posted. Charlie Kirk 1.0 wasn’t a good guy, most likely a member of the deep state cabal. The white hats took CK 1.0 out a while ago, perhaps even years ago. They replaced him with Charlie Kirk 2.0, a body double actor. CK 2.0’s part was no longer needed and so they staged an “assassination” so that CK 2.0 could go back to his previous life. Now folks won’t question the disappearance of CK 1.0 because everyone saw him get “assassinated” on live TV. Some glaring inconsistencies that stand out which brings me to this conclusion. There doesn’t seem to be any ambulances or paramedics at a venue that large which is standard practice. After the “shot” is fired, no first aid is rendered to stop the bleeding, start IV’s and secure the head/neck and place him on a backboard. Instead, what do they do? They carry him to a waiting SUV and toss him in the back seat. There doesn’t appear to have been an autopsy performed and by Friday, 9/12/2024, he’s back home in Arizona apparently having been embalmed and in an open casket so his grieving widow could be filmed crying over his body. The “crime scene” is immediately cleaned up and there doesn’t appear to be any blood splatter anywhere on that white canopy. Apparently the bullet hasn’t been recovered, yet they say with certainty, that they have the murder weapon without performing any ballistic analysis, which is also standard practice. Nothing adds up!
Comments (19)
sorted by:
I agree with a lot of your premises here, but can you fill in the bit about the original Charlie being cabal and being replaced?
I am in the UK and didn't really notice Charlie Kirk until after the 2020 election steal. Back then he was all over the Arizona recounts and I watched a lot of that. I don't have previous experience of him.
What is the history and why do you think Charlie might have been cabal?
As I replied to another comment: if CK was never part of the deep state cabal, then the white hats staged an “assassination” to take him out of the public spotlight because clearly this “assassination” was staged. But why? Did they receive chatter that his life was in danger? If so, then how will he be explained once he makes a public reappearance because a lot of patriots might be pissed about the deception. Just my thoughts.
Stop, please stop making sense. Liberal heads are fixing to explode and conservatives are balancing their emotions between trusting President Trump and getting pissed at the federal government for lying. Something is amiss, just like in every big named assassination. But once you start poking holes in the official narrative, deep state actors come out of the woodwork to try and disprove your theories. Good job, fren. Keep figuring out what happened and continue posting the answers.
Reminds me of when they just carried a supposed dying Ashli Babbit down the stairs almost like a rag doll.
You're right about nothing adding up. We're clearly witnessing another psyop in real time. However, I do t believe for one minute that Charlie Kirk was ever a part of the Deep State/Cabal.
Him never being part of the deep state cabal may be correct. If he wasn’t, then the white hats staged an “assassination” to take him out of the public spotlight because clearly this “assassination” was staged. But why? Did they receive chatter that his life was in danger? If so, then how will he be explained once he makes a public reappearance?
If that’s the case, then you believe the “assassination” was real and CK is dead. Idk, but in my opinion, this was a staged event on Wednesday, 9/10/2025, and nobody was killed at that university that day.
Well with all due respect, there’s too many glaring inconsistencies for me to believe this was anything but a staged event. But that’s what we’re all here for; to question the narrative and offer alternative explanations. Good luck fren!
Some know most of the truth ala JFK. It has just never been officially admitted.
Why do you think he's a 2.0? And when might they have done the switch?
You could be right, but I don't think the second version is a necessary part. As far as I know, during pretty much the entirety of his rise to fame, white hats could have been managing him.
As I replied to another comment: I think it’s CK 2.0 because if an original CK 1.0 was never part of the deep state cabal then the white hats staged an “assassination” to take him out of the public spotlight because clearly this “assassination” was staged. If so, why? Did they receive chatter that his life was in danger? And so then how will the white hats explain his public reappearance? I think a lot of patriots might be pissed about the deception.
Why would WH stage it? Simple. Use game theory. DS has been playing the public for so long, herding people into liberal ideology meant to exploit, divide, conquer and eventially enslave them. Now WH have turned the tables on them using the same weapon. DS has no good response--- they can either 1) accept the narrative and watch their control of the masses slip away, or 2) expose the media as fake. But if they expose the fakery, they themselves will be implicated in everything from George Floyd to Sandy Hook to 9/11. They only have bad choices, because their own best weapon (mass media) is being turned against them. The WH need to do it because if they left media alone, it's like the proverbial dropped gun in a fistfight: the DS would pick it up and resume shooting their own staged distractions just like they've always done.
Whether CK is WH or controlled BH is hard to say, but I think it's a straight up WH op.
Who will benefit from his death? That is the question.