"Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment. "
You are equating "Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence" with "Hate speech".
Learn to read folks. Please, learn to read. If a sentence makes you confused or emotional, please ask an AI to break down the sentence structure to help you process it.
"hate speech" = noun phrase, modified by the adjective hate.
"hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence" = complex noun phrase that even further limits the referenced noun
By your reasoning, anyone who uses a complex noun phrase has stated only the most emotionally triggering part of said phrase.
That would reduce our language to a ping-ponging of emotional keywords.
Oh...I see...
EDIT:
And I'll grant that over the pond this discussion gets different and they are trying to steer us that way so I am sympathetic to why folks are upset. It just pisses me off that she clearly scoped her language and all of a sudden there are 100s of accounts claiming she spoke generally.
And yeah I am aware this is being used to shoe-horn in restrictions on speech, but IMO that makes it all the more important to be frosty about what is actually being stated.
Pam is clearly making an offensive maneuver in our favor here (correctly classifying ANTIFA's activities as "hate speech" that rises to the level of a violent threat), and at the same time turning the "hate speech" terminology against the cabal and making them defend it.
The opportunity for the strategy you are pursuing--denying the existence of the term--has passed. This is a superior strategy: using the term against our opposition when they have little means to protect themselves from it.
How the F she got there is a pissed off moment for me , but I’ve kept quiet recently because I got banned for saying it . Not that I care about being banned, but it’s just not worth it .
Anons need to understand “Enjoy The Show” and yes there could be slight verbiage hiccups, or it’s to purposefully make the “media”, including social media “look here but not over there”. And all as the Information War’s facet is opened all the way, nearing flood level and dam breakage.
Lots of moves are being done purposefully to throw the DemoLibs and Elites into making more drastic mistakes. AG Bondi is doing exactly what she’s supposed to I bet.
I don’t care for Pam Bondi. Pam, Dan Bongino and Kash have been astounding disappointments to me. I am keeping an open mind and remembering that I really don’t “know” anything. All the world’s a stage and we/they are merely players. I trust in God only.
She wasn't wrong, people just took it wrong. Calling for violence against another person is against the law. Don't believe it, ask someone to murder your neighbor. Or tell your neighbor you are going to kill them. Then see how long it takes for LEO to show up at your door.
More disappointed with eople who think a magic wand got waived and everything is fixed overnight. People can even find the enduance to last a decade while things get corrected.
Some of us have been waiting longer than a decade for things to change. What I dislike is the obvious lies. Like I said earlier, I’m trusting the Plan and waiting. I imagine there are things that this admin is fighting, like edits on all the files they have. And yes, I want to see arrests. Sometime soon.
That is what Im talking about.....I believe they are constantly testing the public with these outrageous censorship laws talk....
The WhiteHats WANT to public to push back on foolishness as it shows they are waking up and paying attention.
No, they are performing a basic literacy test on MAGA and many of us failed.
https://x.com/AGPamBondi/status/1967913066554630181
"Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence is NOT protected by the First Amendment. "
You are equating "Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence" with "Hate speech".
Learn to read folks. Please, learn to read. If a sentence makes you confused or emotional, please ask an AI to break down the sentence structure to help you process it.
Pam used poor wording by starting the sentence of with the tem "hate speech". which is a made up word so OF COURSE people will be triggered by it.
Threats of violence are a different matter.
Pretty interesting community note based on this ruling as well https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/
https://i.postimg.cc/2Smq6V4b/Screenshot-2025-09-18-at-09-40-43-Attorney-General-Pamela-Bondi-on-X-Hate-speech-that-crosses-the-li.png
That's not how English works.
"speech" = noun
"hate speech" = noun phrase, modified by the adjective hate.
"hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence" = complex noun phrase that even further limits the referenced noun
By your reasoning, anyone who uses a complex noun phrase has stated only the most emotionally triggering part of said phrase.
That would reduce our language to a ping-ponging of emotional keywords.
Oh...I see...
EDIT:
And I'll grant that over the pond this discussion gets different and they are trying to steer us that way so I am sympathetic to why folks are upset. It just pisses me off that she clearly scoped her language and all of a sudden there are 100s of accounts claiming she spoke generally.
Ok Chomsky, hate speech is a made up word either way..
Same with hate crime.
<chomsky>I'm sure you meant to say "a made up noun phrase".</chomsky>
"Hate crime" is on the books in Texas. Didn't bother checking other states.
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/GV/htm/GV.411.htm#411.046
"Hate speech" is an in-progress operation/concept in the US, but it's on the books with the euros:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022R2065
And yeah I am aware this is being used to shoe-horn in restrictions on speech, but IMO that makes it all the more important to be frosty about what is actually being stated.
Pam is clearly making an offensive maneuver in our favor here (correctly classifying ANTIFA's activities as "hate speech" that rises to the level of a violent threat), and at the same time turning the "hate speech" terminology against the cabal and making them defend it.
The opportunity for the strategy you are pursuing--denying the existence of the term--has passed. This is a superior strategy: using the term against our opposition when they have little means to protect themselves from it.
k
Yup
Bondi needs to go.
How the F she got there is a pissed off moment for me , but I’ve kept quiet recently because I got banned for saying it . Not that I care about being banned, but it’s just not worth it .
Yes.
Anons need to understand “Enjoy The Show” and yes there could be slight verbiage hiccups, or it’s to purposefully make the “media”, including social media “look here but not over there”. And all as the Information War’s facet is opened all the way, nearing flood level and dam breakage.
Lots of moves are being done purposefully to throw the DemoLibs and Elites into making more drastic mistakes. AG Bondi is doing exactly what she’s supposed to I bet.
There was no verbal hickup, there was a reading comprehension failure:
"Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence" is a specific, illegal subset of "Hate speech".
Pam articulated the point perfectly. Folks just can't read or got triggered when they saw the term "hate speech" and mentally went off the rails.
😉🙌🏼
The Collective Giant has Awakened. Power to the collective Voices of the Nation and People.
I don’t care for Pam Bondi. Pam, Dan Bongino and Kash have been astounding disappointments to me. I am keeping an open mind and remembering that I really don’t “know” anything. All the world’s a stage and we/they are merely players. I trust in God only.
She wasn't wrong, people just took it wrong. Calling for violence against another person is against the law. Don't believe it, ask someone to murder your neighbor. Or tell your neighbor you are going to kill them. Then see how long it takes for LEO to show up at your door.
Same !!! It’s called gut instinct , when you know , you know ! Total disappointment from the gate !
More disappointed with eople who think a magic wand got waived and everything is fixed overnight. People can even find the enduance to last a decade while things get corrected.
Some of us have been waiting longer than a decade for things to change. What I dislike is the obvious lies. Like I said earlier, I’m trusting the Plan and waiting. I imagine there are things that this admin is fighting, like edits on all the files they have. And yes, I want to see arrests. Sometime soon.
Theatrics? Or fundamentally unfit for the job?
I'd go with unfit for the job
Read carefully:
https://x.com/AGPamBondi/status/1967913066554630181
"Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence" is a specific, illegal subset of "Hate speech".
I assumed she would walk it back.
Read carefully:
https://x.com/AGPamBondi/status/1967913066554630181
"Hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence" is a specific, illegal subset of "Hate speech".
I can't stand Bondi. She has been the worst pick of all. I hope she is replaced with someone much better.