Why are we only hearing this philosophy now, instead of decades ago? Strange that a few words about medical choices can make a person understand what's been happening to the entire population for a long time. It's part of the dumbing down of American.
Why is the addition of fluoride during the water purification process wrong, but the usage of other halide (like chlorides) not?
Because the water purification process is about contaminant removal. This additive is a difference of kind. Therefore, it ought not to be considered part of the purification process. And since it is performed without our express consent, this action is also immoral since it limits human autonomy.
I wonder what slick legal trick was done to take this industrial waste and dump it into our water supply?
Edit: clarification. Fluoride is bad, because it is added. Chlorine isn't bad because it's used as tool for removal of contamination.
My father (RIP) was a chemical engineer and very knowledgeable about chlorine safety, having been the safety officer at a chemical plant that made Freon and other industrial chemicals that required chlorine as a feed stock, and authored international shipping regulations re chlorine. He said if you could smell just a hint of chlorine in drinking water, you did not have to be concerned about pathogens in the water and a little bit was not harmful. I know, that is a very general statement and doesn't indicate what a safe level would be in a measurable sense.
Personally, I drink and cook with distilled water to avoid ingesting chlorine and fluoride.
Ok, I thought you were saying there was an issue with adding chlorine as well, which i’d never heard before and seemed contrary to what I’ve read about most water purification. Thanks for the clarification!
This has already happened. Back in 2015, Moziac Fertilizer packaged up millions of tons of hazardous waste and sold it to the government as flouride. All that yummy arsenic, lead, and cadmium went right into the drinking water. And they're just the ones who got publicly held accountable for it. Who knows how many other companies were/are doing the same.
Make the libs pay extra for flouride and give them a flag they can hang on the water meter so they can self identify their stupidity.
Kek! I like this! 😸
We are not a third world country.
90% of the U.S. isn't.
Not so sure about Baltimore, Oakland, Detroit, St. Louis, Memphis, Portland, San Francisco, Minneapolis, Atlanta, etc... .
We have 3rd world parts.
San Fran was still beautiful just a decade ago.
Why are we only hearing this philosophy now, instead of decades ago? Strange that a few words about medical choices can make a person understand what's been happening to the entire population for a long time. It's part of the dumbing down of American.
My Dad told me when they first started to put it into the water systems decades ago!
Why is the addition of fluoride during the water purification process wrong, but the usage of other halide (like chlorides) not?
Because the water purification process is about contaminant removal. This additive is a difference of kind. Therefore, it ought not to be considered part of the purification process. And since it is performed without our express consent, this action is also immoral since it limits human autonomy.
I wonder what slick legal trick was done to take this industrial waste and dump it into our water supply?
Edit: clarification. Fluoride is bad, because it is added. Chlorine isn't bad because it's used as tool for removal of contamination.
Is drinking (edit: small amounts of chlorine) particularly bad?
Not familiar with.
I recommend this documentary: https://rumble.com/v5m2l0k-flouride-in-our-drinkingwater.-documentary.html
I meant chlorine
My father (RIP) was a chemical engineer and very knowledgeable about chlorine safety, having been the safety officer at a chemical plant that made Freon and other industrial chemicals that required chlorine as a feed stock, and authored international shipping regulations re chlorine. He said if you could smell just a hint of chlorine in drinking water, you did not have to be concerned about pathogens in the water and a little bit was not harmful. I know, that is a very general statement and doesn't indicate what a safe level would be in a measurable sense.
Personally, I drink and cook with distilled water to avoid ingesting chlorine and fluoride.
Yes. I have read studies where multiple Chinese village wells were contaminated with differing levels of fluoride
Both IQ and fertility were lowered as fluoride presence increased
Not fluoride. Chlorine.
Chlorine is a byproduct during the water purification process. It naturally occurs in things like table salt (sodium chloride).
Ok, I thought you were saying there was an issue with adding chlorine as well, which i’d never heard before and seemed contrary to what I’ve read about most water purification. Thanks for the clarification!
Fluoride is a by product for the fertilizer industry and its poison. Look at the small print on your toothpaste tube and tell me what is says?
What stops these hacks from replaceing the flouride with a different toxic chemical?
This has already happened. Back in 2015, Moziac Fertilizer packaged up millions of tons of hazardous waste and sold it to the government as flouride. All that yummy arsenic, lead, and cadmium went right into the drinking water. And they're just the ones who got publicly held accountable for it. Who knows how many other companies were/are doing the same.
Just get a RO filter. They're cheap and easy to install.
https://nitter.poast.org/SecKennedy/status/1969386068505215480