The first 2 minutes of this video above shows said fbi image and video from inside the windows behind the event that shows the patsy located where the fbi image is.
I am not saying the patsy actually did it etc by any means just because the supposed shot lines up.
Bottom line is, 30-06 can take down TWO moose standing next to each other with enormous exit wounds. Official story has nothing but endless holes. If this was a REAL shot, it was taken at short range from the right, small caliber. Whether CK is in Heaven or Valhalla (odd remark from Kash Patel suggesting witness protection), the act/operation did achieved a desired effect and the world is changing.
HERE'S A REALITY CHECK... videos raise REAL QUESTIONS:
DRONE VIDEO - CROWD SOURCE & forensics expert on bullets ... in the back half of the video, he used 2 cell phone recordings to hone in on A CLOSER RANGE from where the bullet was "discharged" (with overhead display).. compelling data! https://www.youtube.com/live/k5yYDJVdDm8
this graphic is simply wrong. There is an fbi image from the view of the "sniper" / patsy and there is a clear line of site.
https://odysee.com/@januszkowalskii1979:e/Charlie-Kirk---Analysis-(Terry-R.-Eicher):c
The first 2 minutes of this video above shows said fbi image and video from inside the windows behind the event that shows the patsy located where the fbi image is.
I am not saying the patsy actually did it etc by any means just because the supposed shot lines up.
That dude is correct in that the videos he shows , when put together "fit the narrative"
Its just that the narrative is BS to being with.
100%
They showed a shot right from the roof to Charlie they already showed those pictures. It looked pretty clear to me.
The line in the photo is off, due to the panoramic photo sections being misaligned.
I've seen the campus from google earth and there is a clear line of site from the rooftop position.
Your image is spliced incorrectly and the red line drawn on it is erroneous to the two locations.
He's not dead. Wake up.
https://rumble.com/v6z5jjg-the-charlie-kirk-assassination-hoax-full-breakdown.html
Nice find. Thanks. I doubt that we'll ever know the truth.
Bottom line is, 30-06 can take down TWO moose standing next to each other with enormous exit wounds. Official story has nothing but endless holes. If this was a REAL shot, it was taken at short range from the right, small caliber. Whether CK is in Heaven or Valhalla (odd remark from Kash Patel suggesting witness protection), the act/operation did achieved a desired effect and the world is changing.
I lke the way you worded that last sentence.
HERE'S A REALITY CHECK... videos raise REAL QUESTIONS:
DRONE VIDEO - CROWD SOURCE & forensics expert on bullets ... in the back half of the video, he used 2 cell phone recordings to hone in on A CLOSER RANGE from where the bullet was "discharged" (with overhead display).. compelling data! https://www.youtube.com/live/k5yYDJVdDm8
arial attackdrones using AI & ammo deployment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7yIzY1BxuI
see why a 30-06 WAS NOT WHAT HIT HIM...(as the Utah Governor claimed) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INdMTaVmT5I
ps basically anything over a .223 would EXPLODE your neck & exit with a big chunk of meat
BELOW is from a .243 ...again, it would EXPLODE out the backside.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_MUgSrH24E&list=PLD7jKcI6pjb_oYmAcQuvETWsfb2FWKcJB&index=2
BELOW is from a 30-06 ...the entire head (or neck) WOULD EXPLODE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFjWC6EP4wc
https://files.catbox.moe/6qvj4y.jpg
Or a tiny exploding drone