General Flynn says he doesn't believe the official narrative of a lone wolf tranny single-handedly assassinating Charlie Kirk.
"I personally don't believe it was a lone wolf....All the issues about taking a weapon apart...I sat down with experts and looked at the various footage.
I want our government to stand there and tell the American people, we are still investigating this...
It was clear that they had dirtied up the crime scene.
Just level with us...
Stop all this nonsense about we've caught our guy..There's just been too much.
What it does is it damages and continues to eat away and erode the trust between the people of this country and the government...
People want to trust our law enforcement
This particular issue with Charlie Kirk was such a seminal event in the history of the United States of America.
It smells bad. It looks bad...Something about it is not right...
The American people, we have decided that we just aren't going to put up with this anymore..."
Does anyone actually believe the official story they are telling us?
There are just way too many suspicious things coming up.
The American people have become well-versed in questioning the official narratives and doing our own research.
They no longer just blindly believe what the government tells us. @GenFlynn @LizCrokin
Listening to the whole clip, I think its significant. Personally, think there are few people that are so consistently on point as Flynn.
What I find curious is the people like Candace Owens, who (to my mind) have their own narrative that they are pushing, relentlessly. Folks that like that narrative tend to chime in and see her as a fount of truth. I don't.
Flynn, however, ALWAYS points to the key issues of mobilizing the American people to get involved in the process, act locally, and always points to the core necessity of restoring the proper relationship between the Govt and the People of the USA.
In this case, other folks seem to be deflecting to me: "Tha Joos!"
People do not know. Flynn emphasized here that something isn't right, but is also very clear and does NOT make claims about what the real story is, unlike some folks, who, apparently, are never wrong.
It was Israel it’s not that complicated. They have the most motive and all the circumstantial evidence points to them. There are probably other co conspirators with in TPUSA and they used some idiot Antifa patsies
Just saying we’re yelling “mmmuuuuhhh jjjoooossss” shows a lack of critical thinking. And shows you haven’t really looked into our point.
Autists on X and Instagram have already broken down all the connections, all the Zionist and Free masonry symbolism, all the weird events that happened that day.
Known Mossad agents like Laura Loomer trying to deflect blame to China is laughable.
If you can give us a well thought out argument with evidence that it wasn’t Israel I will listen to it. And if you can explain what narrative people like Candace are pushing and why despite her saying she will stop if Erika Kirk tells her to I will listen.
Fantastic. I guess everyone can just sit back and relax now, because ... you KNOW it was Israel? /sarc
If you can give us .... And if you can explain... I will listen.
Kek. Nah, I'm not interested in that sort of bargaining. I have zero concern about whether you listen or not. Any ideas I share here are offered freely, and people can absorb (or listen) at their own free choice.
But, if YOU can put up a well-written, articulate theory of why and how it was "Israel", I'd be interested to read it.
EDIT: actually, can you point me to somewhere where I could read on this? An article, for example, that outlines and articulates the theory (theories)? I'd rather be able to scan a write up than tune in to a video. I'm really not big on inflooencer videos these days. sic.
Just saying we’re yelling “mmmuuuuhhh jjjoooossss” shows a lack of critical thinking.
Yeah, but I didn't say that. What I DID say (albeit ambiguously and rather clumsily!) was that certain people saying "Israel did this!" in the public sphere, like Owens, for example, (If that's what she's doing), are deflecting from more critical issues. "seem to be" indicates opinion. I'm sharing an impression.
And shows you haven’t really looked into our point.
Well, yeah, I'll give you that. It might be my bias at work, but I'm yet to see an articulate theory of Who / What, and in general, my info war radar tends to take note of sensationalism and sees red flags in that, because there are psyops literally everywhere. Certain topics or themes will generate lots of sensational response from certain sectors, and of those, I tend to be wary.
I should mention that, fwiw, I think the (general) attachment to Israel and the Joos is a psyop, used by those further behind the scenes, like a sort of limited hangout. "Anti-Semitic vs Israel" is a smoke screen, imo.
Where do all the threads gather? Where do all the paths lead? Where do all the arrows point?
To the trans-national criminal organization we loosely know as 'The Cabal', of which (I accept as an unproven fact) the Israel DS and Israel project is a significant part.
In other words, different clothes, but same operator. (Corrupt) C_A? Mossad? British DS? WEF? All simply different agents of the same fundamental entity. imo.
Hey Frac - What I thought was interesting were the text messages between CK and ?
Essentially calling out the fact that the namestealers were pissing him off and that he'd have to deal with it - right before he got clipped.
I think Candace is just another voice "chipping away" or gnawing away at the proverbial insulation that faction has been using to counter any finger pointing. I don't really dig on her show but it is what it is.
I also find it interesting how Candace came to acquire those text messages...Who sent them to her? Was it someone @ TP? Someone in the govt?
What's his face @ TP verified those text messages from CK were "le git" and also mentioned that in "those first critical hours" he didn't "leave any stone unturned" so he "gave those texts to someone in the govt".
Jury's out on what the REAL DEAL is...but for certain suspects - the optics are not good...Like N'Yahoo coming out, unsolicited explaining how he had nothing to do with it...multiple times...
I continue to observe, albeit without a great focus, as I get the feeling that a lot of this is distraction.
I think Candace is just another voice "chipping away" or gnawing away
If that's the case, that's a positive, I guess. But I personally feel like Candace is more of a distraction from more important matters. But that's me.
General Flynn says he doesn't believe the official narrative of a lone wolf tranny single-handedly assassinating Charlie Kirk.
"I personally don't believe it was a lone wolf....All the issues about taking a weapon apart...I sat down with experts and looked at the various footage. I want our government to stand there and tell the American people, we are still investigating this... It was clear that they had dirtied up the crime scene. Just level with us... Stop all this nonsense about we've caught our guy..There's just been too much. What it does is it damages and continues to eat away and erode the trust between the people of this country and the government... People want to trust our law enforcement This particular issue with Charlie Kirk was such a seminal event in the history of the United States of America. It smells bad. It looks bad...Something about it is not right...
The American people, we have decided that we just aren't going to put up with this anymore..."
Does anyone actually believe the official story they are telling us?
There are just way too many suspicious things coming up.
The American people have become well-versed in questioning the official narratives and doing our own research.
They no longer just blindly believe what the government tells us. @GenFlynn @LizCrokin
Listening to the whole clip, I think its significant. Personally, think there are few people that are so consistently on point as Flynn.
What I find curious is the people like Candace Owens, who (to my mind) have their own narrative that they are pushing, relentlessly. Folks that like that narrative tend to chime in and see her as a fount of truth. I don't.
Flynn, however, ALWAYS points to the key issues of mobilizing the American people to get involved in the process, act locally, and always points to the core necessity of restoring the proper relationship between the Govt and the People of the USA.
In this case, other folks seem to be deflecting to me: "Tha Joos!"
People do not know. Flynn emphasized here that something isn't right, but is also very clear and does NOT make claims about what the real story is, unlike some folks, who, apparently, are never wrong.
It was Israel it’s not that complicated. They have the most motive and all the circumstantial evidence points to them. There are probably other co conspirators with in TPUSA and they used some idiot Antifa patsies
Just saying we’re yelling “mmmuuuuhhh jjjoooossss” shows a lack of critical thinking. And shows you haven’t really looked into our point.
Autists on X and Instagram have already broken down all the connections, all the Zionist and Free masonry symbolism, all the weird events that happened that day.
Known Mossad agents like Laura Loomer trying to deflect blame to China is laughable.
If you can give us a well thought out argument with evidence that it wasn’t Israel I will listen to it. And if you can explain what narrative people like Candace are pushing and why despite her saying she will stop if Erika Kirk tells her to I will listen.
Fantastic. I guess everyone can just sit back and relax now, because ... you KNOW it was Israel? /sarc
Kek. Nah, I'm not interested in that sort of bargaining. I have zero concern about whether you listen or not. Any ideas I share here are offered freely, and people can absorb (or listen) at their own free choice.
But, if YOU can put up a well-written, articulate theory of why and how it was "Israel", I'd be interested to read it.
EDIT: actually, can you point me to somewhere where I could read on this? An article, for example, that outlines and articulates the theory (theories)? I'd rather be able to scan a write up than tune in to a video. I'm really not big on inflooencer videos these days. sic.
Yeah, but I didn't say that. What I DID say (albeit ambiguously and rather clumsily!) was that certain people saying "Israel did this!" in the public sphere, like Owens, for example, (If that's what she's doing), are deflecting from more critical issues. "seem to be" indicates opinion. I'm sharing an impression.
Well, yeah, I'll give you that. It might be my bias at work, but I'm yet to see an articulate theory of Who / What, and in general, my info war radar tends to take note of sensationalism and sees red flags in that, because there are psyops literally everywhere. Certain topics or themes will generate lots of sensational response from certain sectors, and of those, I tend to be wary.
I should mention that, fwiw, I think the (general) attachment to Israel and the Joos is a psyop, used by those further behind the scenes, like a sort of limited hangout. "Anti-Semitic vs Israel" is a smoke screen, imo.
Where do all the threads gather? Where do all the paths lead? Where do all the arrows point?
To the trans-national criminal organization we loosely know as 'The Cabal', of which (I accept as an unproven fact) the Israel DS and Israel project is a significant part.
In other words, different clothes, but same operator. (Corrupt) C_A? Mossad? British DS? WEF? All simply different agents of the same fundamental entity. imo.
Hey Frac - What I thought was interesting were the text messages between CK and ?
Essentially calling out the fact that the namestealers were pissing him off and that he'd have to deal with it - right before he got clipped.
I think Candace is just another voice "chipping away" or gnawing away at the proverbial insulation that faction has been using to counter any finger pointing. I don't really dig on her show but it is what it is.
I also find it interesting how Candace came to acquire those text messages...Who sent them to her? Was it someone @ TP? Someone in the govt?
What's his face @ TP verified those text messages from CK were "le git" and also mentioned that in "those first critical hours" he didn't "leave any stone unturned" so he "gave those texts to someone in the govt".
Jury's out on what the REAL DEAL is...but for certain suspects - the optics are not good...Like N'Yahoo coming out, unsolicited explaining how he had nothing to do with it...multiple times...
RE: https://x.com/Lukewearechange/status/1975606283773300955
TY. Good questions.
I continue to observe, albeit without a great focus, as I get the feeling that a lot of this is distraction.
If that's the case, that's a positive, I guess. But I personally feel like Candace is more of a distraction from more important matters. But that's me.