Yes, I have asked myself most of those questions and concluded tentatively that Kirk was not shot and was exfiltrated by his team alive into the SUV.
For all you people who find this an offensive view, ask yourself why it's offensive to look at the evidence and reach conclusions based on them. Don't let emotion get involved in your analysis. Just the facts.
Additionally to the questions asked in this video, I'd like to point out that it looks to me as if the narrative is intentionally full of holes for anons to investigate.
That gives it a differential meaning between the different audiences, that is, the anons are supposed to see a different thing from the sheepy members of the public.
I think Candace and her digging is a part of this operation and I wonder if it meant to change the public perception of Israel, which is quite hard to shift amongst dispensationalist Christians.
I think there's a trail towards Israel for the normies to follow and I think It's all well planned and timed.
Because using fake assassinations to manipulate the public is not how you rebuild trust in authority. It would enrage the population and would make MAGA no better than the current ruling establishment. This isn't the same as saying Epstein hung himself and you wisk him away to testify later. I wish many of you who think Charlie is alive would stop treating everything as some fucking mysterious conspiracy. This is war and war has casualties.
What I think you are doing here is what you just accused me of doing. You're getting emotional.
Of course it's some kind of conspiracy. All assassinations, either real or fake are conspiracies by definition if they involve more than one person.
In this case, you just have to look at the evidence to see that we are being lied to. No way could the apparent injury result from a sniper shot with 30.06 ammunition from in front in the way the MSM has told it.
We are DEFINITELY being lied to. Make peace with that and look carefully at the evidence and only then will I take you seriously, whether you agree with me or not.
Because using fake assassinations to manipulate the public is not how you rebuild trust in authority. It would enrage the population and would make MAGA no better than the current ruling establishment.
This bit is a very good point and I didn't address it, I'm just going on the apparent evidence at this point and not addressing the issue of the white hats doing a fake assassination and the serious implications of that.
It is what it is, we have to follow the evidence.
My own idea is that there was a real assassination planned which the white hats thwarted, but allowed it to continue in the public eye. So in that sense, there really was an assassination attempt if I'm right there. Anyway, that is my conjecture at this stage.
There are ends that outweigh the damage of a WH op.
1.) We know CK was being pressured from Israeli government- to be a mouthpiece for their propaganda. He was already a target for refusing to do so.
2.) US needed a heroic martyr to stir the population toward patriotism and call attention to CK’s messaging and legacy.
3.) US needs a strong narrative that has eyes on to lead evangelicals away from a pro-Israel stance and we all should know why.
It's a last chance for people to snap out of the spell. Maybe not the last chance, but definitely a marked offramp.
Q worked hard to break us away from the normie herd. Many of us successfully disengaged, often bringing others with us. Others got their attachments merely loosened, but it's still helpful. I think this is the turning point, by which the ones who can't separate themselves from media lies will now be getting standard psyops without WH notes. The bumpy ride instead of the cushy seats.
PoU- I have followed all of Candace’s drops and must agree. Same conclusion. Interesting she’s never examined the angle that the death could have been faked.
I refuse to watch the video of Charlie shot, but question to those who did view it- does he look dead? And how could he have faked it so well?
If you look at it this way, there are a lot of gunshot wounds which you wouldn't be able to fake in public where there is a big exit wound. For example, I don't think it would possible to fake JFK's assassination because of the apparent wounds.
I've watched the footage of the Charlie Kirk video with a critical eye many times.
I see a squirt of blood and a blast of air and a small bodily reaction. All of these could have been rigged. What I don't see is an exit wound or any blood flow when he's being moved. I don't see any blood spray. I don't see anyone try to attend to his wounds. I don't see any of his helpers with any blood on their hands.
The main narrative that he was shot with a 30.06 round from a sniper rifle does not match what was observed. There would be a huge exit wound, quite visible, and blood all over the tent behind him. Other theories about other lower speed projectiles don't really match up to the apparent injury either in my view and it brings up the question - why would someone shoot Charlie with a low velocity projectile if they already had a sniper set up on a roof with a sniper rifle? Sniper rifles are a reliable method for assassination, so the idea that he was killed in another way makes no sense, except if it was faked.
If you think of Hollywood films, they film actors getting hit by bullets - but it's all fake of course. These techniques, blood bags and squibs could conceivably have been used in this situation and IMO they are the best way to account for the visible evidence.
The video I saw showed a trap door like for underground electrical. Ten seconds after the shot they pick up a body wearing pristine white shoes and pristine white t-shirt with no Freedom logo on it, pitch black hair, no blood. The area was paved over very quickly afterward.
Anons need to listen to Prophetic Dream 2024-Intercede for Candace Owens! "Ark of Grace Ministries" This is regarding Candace's last podcast. She is wearing a white shirt, and people influencing her. Kanye West and Andrew Tate? I believe at one time she loved the Lord, but when George entered her life, she changed, and Charlie seen the change. George was raised by Born Again Believers. There is a video " How far back do George Farmer and Andrew Tate..." that would explain the change. Pray for Candace and George
No. She didn't change for the worse after marrying. In fact, she may have become even more religious. Her husband's Oxford university education was in Theology! She converted to Catholicism to join her husband's religion after marrying. And after being fired from her job due to her saying 'Christ is King', she was freed from her J-w_ish overlords and could speak her mind freely.
Candace is brilliant and a good friend to Charlie. She was touring with him last year and was only asked to leave due to pressure from his J-e-w--sh sponsors as she was beginning to talk of I-s-r-a-el and G-a-=za and they didn't like it.
Did you not see that 2 days before he was killed, he was in a group text where he said he was getting bullied by his J-e-w--sh sponsors and they were pulling millions of dollars from him because he wouldn't disown Tucker Carlson?
He stated that he would not tolerate the bullying from them and WAS GOING TO STOP PROMOTING I-s-r-a--el. In the same text exchange he said he was going to bring back CANDACE to his tour!
You clearly don't know enough about things, so you should refrain from speculating negatively about her.
I know enough to know she hasn't denounce her friendship with the Islamist child sex trafficker, Tate, and neither has George. Watch the video. Not surprise, that catholics, like their marxist pope, believe as you do, about Israel. Evangelicals believe God will fulfill the promises He made to Israel. Catholics and Islam share a kinship with Palestinians, that it's their land and it was not promised to Abraham and his descendants. Charlie said the greatest threat to Christianity, is Muhammism, NOT Israel!
Joshua 23:14.
14 “Now behold, today I am going the way of all the earth, and you know in all your hearts and in all your souls that not one word of all the good words which the Lord your God spoke concerning you has failed; all have [i]been fulfilled for you, not [j]one of them has failed."
The promises of old were fulfilled then, only the promise that Abraham's descendants would be as the stars of heaven (the elohim - the angels) was left, that is the promise of eternal life that is fulfilled in Christ.
Yes, I have asked myself most of those questions and concluded tentatively that Kirk was not shot and was exfiltrated by his team alive into the SUV.
For all you people who find this an offensive view, ask yourself why it's offensive to look at the evidence and reach conclusions based on them. Don't let emotion get involved in your analysis. Just the facts.
Additionally to the questions asked in this video, I'd like to point out that it looks to me as if the narrative is intentionally full of holes for anons to investigate. That gives it a differential meaning between the different audiences, that is, the anons are supposed to see a different thing from the sheepy members of the public.
I think Candace and her digging is a part of this operation and I wonder if it meant to change the public perception of Israel, which is quite hard to shift amongst dispensationalist Christians.
I think there's a trail towards Israel for the normies to follow and I think It's all well planned and timed.
No offense but that's a stupid conclusion.
Why?
Because using fake assassinations to manipulate the public is not how you rebuild trust in authority. It would enrage the population and would make MAGA no better than the current ruling establishment. This isn't the same as saying Epstein hung himself and you wisk him away to testify later. I wish many of you who think Charlie is alive would stop treating everything as some fucking mysterious conspiracy. This is war and war has casualties.
What I think you are doing here is what you just accused me of doing. You're getting emotional.
Of course it's some kind of conspiracy. All assassinations, either real or fake are conspiracies by definition if they involve more than one person.
In this case, you just have to look at the evidence to see that we are being lied to. No way could the apparent injury result from a sniper shot with 30.06 ammunition from in front in the way the MSM has told it.
We are DEFINITELY being lied to. Make peace with that and look carefully at the evidence and only then will I take you seriously, whether you agree with me or not.
This bit is a very good point and I didn't address it, I'm just going on the apparent evidence at this point and not addressing the issue of the white hats doing a fake assassination and the serious implications of that.
It is what it is, we have to follow the evidence.
My own idea is that there was a real assassination planned which the white hats thwarted, but allowed it to continue in the public eye. So in that sense, there really was an assassination attempt if I'm right there. Anyway, that is my conjecture at this stage.
We think alike. I know this is a movie. I was told the ending is not for everybody.
I see the sloppy PSYOP very clearly... but to what ends?
There are ends that outweigh the damage of a WH op. 1.) We know CK was being pressured from Israeli government- to be a mouthpiece for their propaganda. He was already a target for refusing to do so.
2.) US needed a heroic martyr to stir the population toward patriotism and call attention to CK’s messaging and legacy.
3.) US needs a strong narrative that has eyes on to lead evangelicals away from a pro-Israel stance and we all should know why.
It’s 3 birds, one stone.
Agreed
It's a last chance for people to snap out of the spell. Maybe not the last chance, but definitely a marked offramp.
Q worked hard to break us away from the normie herd. Many of us successfully disengaged, often bringing others with us. Others got their attachments merely loosened, but it's still helpful. I think this is the turning point, by which the ones who can't separate themselves from media lies will now be getting standard psyops without WH notes. The bumpy ride instead of the cushy seats.
You mean that was the easy way and now there's going to be the hard way?
Yup. We'll all get there, one way or another.
Man.. the easy way is hard enough, I don't envy those who choose the hard way.
UFO attack on the way !
To what ends?
See my reply above
Do you mean why would the CK assassination be a WH psyop?
Or do you mean why would WH need a turning point at all, to perform psyops instead of gradually awakening those still unaware?
I understand the limited time frame thing... but there sure are a lot of unanswered questions.
PoU- I have followed all of Candace’s drops and must agree. Same conclusion. Interesting she’s never examined the angle that the death could have been faked.
I refuse to watch the video of Charlie shot, but question to those who did view it- does he look dead? And how could he have faked it so well?
If you look at it this way, there are a lot of gunshot wounds which you wouldn't be able to fake in public where there is a big exit wound. For example, I don't think it would possible to fake JFK's assassination because of the apparent wounds.
I've watched the footage of the Charlie Kirk video with a critical eye many times. I see a squirt of blood and a blast of air and a small bodily reaction. All of these could have been rigged. What I don't see is an exit wound or any blood flow when he's being moved. I don't see any blood spray. I don't see anyone try to attend to his wounds. I don't see any of his helpers with any blood on their hands.
The main narrative that he was shot with a 30.06 round from a sniper rifle does not match what was observed. There would be a huge exit wound, quite visible, and blood all over the tent behind him. Other theories about other lower speed projectiles don't really match up to the apparent injury either in my view and it brings up the question - why would someone shoot Charlie with a low velocity projectile if they already had a sniper set up on a roof with a sniper rifle? Sniper rifles are a reliable method for assassination, so the idea that he was killed in another way makes no sense, except if it was faked.
If you think of Hollywood films, they film actors getting hit by bullets - but it's all fake of course. These techniques, blood bags and squibs could conceivably have been used in this situation and IMO they are the best way to account for the visible evidence.
I thought it was fake the second I saw it. It looked like a squib to me.
That camera , looking thing , they unhooked behind him , was actually a hologram projector. He went down through the trap door beneath him.
The video I saw showed a trap door like for underground electrical. Ten seconds after the shot they pick up a body wearing pristine white shoes and pristine white t-shirt with no Freedom logo on it, pitch black hair, no blood. The area was paved over very quickly afterward.
Rogan clip
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/Gu-dyvS1C9Q
Anons need to listen to Prophetic Dream 2024-Intercede for Candace Owens! "Ark of Grace Ministries" This is regarding Candace's last podcast. She is wearing a white shirt, and people influencing her. Kanye West and Andrew Tate? I believe at one time she loved the Lord, but when George entered her life, she changed, and Charlie seen the change. George was raised by Born Again Believers. There is a video " How far back do George Farmer and Andrew Tate..." that would explain the change. Pray for Candace and George
No. She didn't change for the worse after marrying. In fact, she may have become even more religious. Her husband's Oxford university education was in Theology! She converted to Catholicism to join her husband's religion after marrying. And after being fired from her job due to her saying 'Christ is King', she was freed from her J-w_ish overlords and could speak her mind freely.
Candace is brilliant and a good friend to Charlie. She was touring with him last year and was only asked to leave due to pressure from his J-e-w--sh sponsors as she was beginning to talk of I-s-r-a-el and G-a-=za and they didn't like it.
Did you not see that 2 days before he was killed, he was in a group text where he said he was getting bullied by his J-e-w--sh sponsors and they were pulling millions of dollars from him because he wouldn't disown Tucker Carlson?
He stated that he would not tolerate the bullying from them and WAS GOING TO STOP PROMOTING I-s-r-a--el. In the same text exchange he said he was going to bring back CANDACE to his tour!
You clearly don't know enough about things, so you should refrain from speculating negatively about her.
I know enough to know she hasn't denounce her friendship with the Islamist child sex trafficker, Tate, and neither has George. Watch the video. Not surprise, that catholics, like their marxist pope, believe as you do, about Israel. Evangelicals believe God will fulfill the promises He made to Israel. Catholics and Islam share a kinship with Palestinians, that it's their land and it was not promised to Abraham and his descendants. Charlie said the greatest threat to Christianity, is Muhammism, NOT Israel!
Joshua 23:14. 14 “Now behold, today I am going the way of all the earth, and you know in all your hearts and in all your souls that not one word of all the good words which the Lord your God spoke concerning you has failed; all have [i]been fulfilled for you, not [j]one of them has failed."
The promises of old were fulfilled then, only the promise that Abraham's descendants would be as the stars of heaven (the elohim - the angels) was left, that is the promise of eternal life that is fulfilled in Christ.
And how is this 3I/ATLAS tied into this PSYOP? It has just broken up into 17 'comets'... There is that number again!