I would have posed the question: Who is going to negotiate the deal. Certainly not the Congress. And the negotiator must have the authority or the other side wonβt negotiate. It must be a presidential power.
An authority thatβs been enumerate, like in the Constitution? Written in plain 6th grade language in Article 2? That Congress and the courts swore to uphold?
The Supremes never should have even taken the case. Not a single court should have taken this case. Itβs obstruction and a waste of time. Weβre gonna need a statue to Clarence Thomas after this is done. Heβs an absolute Buzzsaw. Scalia is somewhere looking down and smiling.
I would have posed the question: Who is going to negotiate the deal. Certainly not the Congress. And the negotiator must have the authority or the other side wonβt negotiate. It must be a presidential power.
An authority thatβs been enumerate, like in the Constitution? Written in plain 6th grade language in Article 2? That Congress and the courts swore to uphold?
The Supremes never should have even taken the case. Not a single court should have taken this case. Itβs obstruction and a waste of time. Weβre gonna need a statue to Clarence Thomas after this is done. Heβs an absolute Buzzsaw. Scalia is somewhere looking down and smiling.
Absolutely correct.
This is Fake News. FYI. Do better!!
Thank you. Wondered why this was hanging out at the bottom of the stack
YES !!!!!
This is spam, isnβt it? Theyβre even asking for engagement, not reporting details of a news happening.
The decision isnβt expected until May or June.
πππππππππππππππππππππππππππ