I support him. That doesn't mean I have to be happy about hearing him want to primary one of the few people in congress I can count on (MTG) to support our 2nd amendment rights.
Why is this first reaction at this point to engage with this statement directly, instead of as an example of kayfabe and comms?
“Politics is acting for ugly people.”
There is still so much direct, literal engagement with tweets like this, rather than looking up post timestamps, references to bracketed capitalized words, and other Q-adjacent methodologies, etc. I don’t understand why.
This isn’t about you per se, more that I’m confused as to why the direct, literal approach is still so widespread after so many years.
Do we need better comms training threads? I know I could definitely still use better training on these things to get even remotely near the level of some people. See also sylver’s and oldschoolfool’s comments below.
i am a fan of the kayfabe angle right now because everything that is part of the show is kayfabe when you think about it but anyway here is mtg responding
Because there are literal retards here, that's why. They don't understand that we're in a war and shit happens in war that only the generals understand. Sigh.
rumor has it weinstein was effectively a hollywood nobody thrown to the wolves compared to the real backroom players, much like how bernie maddoff was used as a financial fall boy
Its the old knee jerk reaction. Besides. Trump supports our gun rights just fine and he is the final word on legislation. There is something else going on here or MTG has been compromised and trump is dumping here dead weight. Something tells me there is more to it.
Dude are you really not capable of picking up on his schtick yet? Every time he lacks bipartisan support for something he positions himself/dangles himself in some way to make the Dems think they’ve got a play on him and he swipes the rug out. Trump isn’t a liar by creating a tactical ruse anymore than Sun Tzu was encouraging people to lie by ADMITTING that all warfare must, by necessity, be based on deception. Are football players liars when they fake a handoff and toss a fifty yard bomb instead? THAT’S THE FUCKING GAME, GENIUS.
Don’t comment on chess when all you know is checkers, dude.
Don't feel bad, fren. It's an op. How long will it take to primary her??? By then they will be kissing friends again. I bet they planned this ahead of time. She is saying things he can't atm & him appearing to be upset adds emphasis which is exactly what both of them & the white hats want.
I think you’re both kind of right and wrong in your assessments here.
We don’t have to line up with everything Trump says publicly in order to support him. We can easily disagree with what he says publicly and still trust the strategy he’s employing by choosing to say it.
I’ve come to trust Trump absolutely over the past 9 years. He has proven too many times over too long a period that when he says something I disagree with either:
He ends up being right because he knew stuff I wasn’t privy to
Or
He didn’t actually believe what he said, and clearly only said what he said for a tactical reason that became apparent later on (and is often obvious to me in the moment).
Q has helped me get this. Disinformation is NECESSARY in this kind of war. Where you are weak, it can be wise to make yourself appear strong. Where you are strong it can often benefit you to appear weak. When you are United it sometimes makes sense to appear divided (see: his “fight” with obvious white hat ally, Musk). I no longer sweat what Trump says publicly. I don’t get mad at him for what he says nor do I immediately accept it at face value. I trust what he’s doing even if I disagree with what he says. He’s more than earned that kind of trust at this point if you ask me. He manipulates the narrative strategically at every turn. He’s always playing a deeper game than his surface comments suggest. We know what he stands for. We know who he’s fighting for. We know who he’s fighting against. I just sit back and enjoy the show. Chess, not checkers.
I support him. That doesn't mean I have to be happy about hearing him want to primary one of the few people in congress I can count on (MTG) to support our 2nd amendment rights.
Serious question:
Why is this first reaction at this point to engage with this statement directly, instead of as an example of kayfabe and comms?
“Politics is acting for ugly people.”
There is still so much direct, literal engagement with tweets like this, rather than looking up post timestamps, references to bracketed capitalized words, and other Q-adjacent methodologies, etc. I don’t understand why.
This isn’t about you per se, more that I’m confused as to why the direct, literal approach is still so widespread after so many years.
Do we need better comms training threads? I know I could definitely still use better training on these things to get even remotely near the level of some people. See also sylver’s and oldschoolfool’s comments below.
i am a fan of the kayfabe angle right now because everything that is part of the show is kayfabe when you think about it but anyway here is mtg responding
Because there are literal retards here, that's why. They don't understand that we're in a war and shit happens in war that only the generals understand. Sigh.
In Hollywood the cream rises, in Washington the skum rises.
Does Hollywood still have a cream-rising system in place since Weinstein got arrested?
Ahem.
rumor has it weinstein was effectively a hollywood nobody thrown to the wolves compared to the real backroom players, much like how bernie maddoff was used as a financial fall boy
Yeah I was very generous there. The truth is they are both scum except one might have a little Talent.
Its the old knee jerk reaction. Besides. Trump supports our gun rights just fine and he is the final word on legislation. There is something else going on here or MTG has been compromised and trump is dumping here dead weight. Something tells me there is more to it.
Dude are you really not capable of picking up on his schtick yet? Every time he lacks bipartisan support for something he positions himself/dangles himself in some way to make the Dems think they’ve got a play on him and he swipes the rug out. Trump isn’t a liar by creating a tactical ruse anymore than Sun Tzu was encouraging people to lie by ADMITTING that all warfare must, by necessity, be based on deception. Are football players liars when they fake a handoff and toss a fifty yard bomb instead? THAT’S THE FUCKING GAME, GENIUS.
Don’t comment on chess when all you know is checkers, dude.
Your comment deserves a sticky!
DeSantis, Elon Musk, what would you say to this being another fake fued amongst his supporters?
Obviously MTG has been about as big a supporter of POTUS as one can get, so me thinks this is the same thing.
A fued orchestrated for the benefit of others.
Anything is possible.
100 percent
Don't feel bad, fren. It's an op. How long will it take to primary her??? By then they will be kissing friends again. I bet they planned this ahead of time. She is saying things he can't atm & him appearing to be upset adds emphasis which is exactly what both of them & the white hats want.
I think you’re both kind of right and wrong in your assessments here.
We don’t have to line up with everything Trump says publicly in order to support him. We can easily disagree with what he says publicly and still trust the strategy he’s employing by choosing to say it.
I’ve come to trust Trump absolutely over the past 9 years. He has proven too many times over too long a period that when he says something I disagree with either:
Or
Q has helped me get this. Disinformation is NECESSARY in this kind of war. Where you are weak, it can be wise to make yourself appear strong. Where you are strong it can often benefit you to appear weak. When you are United it sometimes makes sense to appear divided (see: his “fight” with obvious white hat ally, Musk). I no longer sweat what Trump says publicly. I don’t get mad at him for what he says nor do I immediately accept it at face value. I trust what he’s doing even if I disagree with what he says. He’s more than earned that kind of trust at this point if you ask me. He manipulates the narrative strategically at every turn. He’s always playing a deeper game than his surface comments suggest. We know what he stands for. We know who he’s fighting for. We know who he’s fighting against. I just sit back and enjoy the show. Chess, not checkers.