Yes, their wording was careful to point out that only illegal orders should not be followed, without defining which orders might be illegal. Very close to blatant sedition while preserving deniability.
Yeah, this has been bugging me. The leftists assume everything Trump does is illegal so these kinds of semantics games work very well on them. This kind of social manipulation should be countered in public discourse and Team Trump shoukd have been all over that, demanding the dems define which orders might be illegal. Lies and manipulation must be countered in the same arena they're disseminated in.
This was drawn up by a lawyer to walk right up to the deniability line. However, any other comments they can't resist making will push them over the line.
Yes, their wording was careful to point out that only illegal orders should not be followed, without defining which orders might be illegal. Very close to blatant sedition while preserving deniability.
Yeah, this has been bugging me. The leftists assume everything Trump does is illegal so these kinds of semantics games work very well on them. This kind of social manipulation should be countered in public discourse and Team Trump shoukd have been all over that, demanding the dems define which orders might be illegal. Lies and manipulation must be countered in the same arena they're disseminated in.
I absolutely love when handshakes make comments like this. Welcome, fren 🍻
This was drawn up by a lawyer to walk right up to the deniability line. However, any other comments they can't resist making will push them over the line.