According to Lin Wood Valhalla is a Military Base.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
I agree with what wood is saying here. It’s not like we’re throwing money at Lin wood for his opinions.😂 I haven’t even heard from Lin wood since 2020 and I don’t care if I ever will find him speaking on anything ever again. Kash could be throwing it out there because the white hats do not give a single shit about who knows what. There’s no way to prove that it is a witness protection program. And if you do know what it is, say you’re Hillary Clinton and you know it is real…that’s Kash rubbing it in that they pulled off a reverse hoax on the deep state assclown killers.
Yeah, he could. But I don't that theory it makes much sense, myself. Not much sense, and not really much evidence.
Q dropped disinformation on purpose, as part of his operation. Is Patel now in the job of 'rubbing it in'', while potentially exposing the wider community to the information that, gee, see, Charlie's murder was a hoax!?
Stretching, imo. But we can agree to disagree.
Thanks for the reply.
“We’ll see you in Valhalla”
Valhalla Danish House
Leigh 0985
Goat Island
New Zealand
I don’t buy Wood’s take, but there’s also quite likely some reason Kash said that.
“Where do actors go when they exit the stage?”
Yeah I really don’t see what’s so ridiculous about the theory. Him being held at a witness protection facility, I assume temporarily for safe keeping, is not the same as putting him in witness protection for life with a new identity, etc.
I have no idea if Charlie is really there but practically vomiting at the idea in a huge dramatic display like u/fractal just did is…well…somehow almost suspect to me. Like really, man? That idea is THAT hard to believe and Lin Wood is the big bad reason for that literary eye roll? Okay….
Kekkeke. Pretty apt description.
But.... I think either you misread what I wrote, or perhaps, in my enthusiasm to vomit up a big (huge) dramatic display, I expressed the idea poorly. Although, maybe not, because Doi seemed to get it pretty clearly. Ironic that you are even replying to Doi, while missing the very point he's addressing.
In any case, perhaps I can clarify
Idea that Kirk is in witness protection, a witness protection theory - not a ridiculous idea or theory
Idea that FBI Director Kash Patel would blurt out "See you at that facility, Charlie" - a ridiculous idea or theory
For what reasons?
Patel constantly presents himself as very serious about his job. He's not trolling anymore, like he was when he jived with the (little) "q" account on Truth Social, etc.
Patel is going to openly admit to the public that the Kirk assassination is a hoax because....? Is he trying to undermine the credibility of the Administration? Of the FBI which he heads?
There is already plenty of distrust out there in - let's call it the non-MSM sphere - i.e. anons, truthers, alt-media (on the <ahem> 'right'), podsters, etc. So for what rationale reason would Patel want to further undermine public support by conducting and then openly admitting - by saying "See you Charlie at the <ahem> facility!"?
To me, the idea that Patel would do this is ridiculous, NOT the idea that in fact, the Kirk 'assassination' was a hoax, and that Kirk is in federal protection somewhere.
Although that Idea I find a little unacceptable, its not completely ridiculous. (Even though I have my own ideas about it, I won't voice them here.)
End: Doi actually makes a reasonable argument (even if I don't agree with it) about why Patel would do this. Personally, I find that line of thinking a little... gee, I mean, after a while, it seems like some of us just cram the evidence in to an ill-fitting box for the sake of preserving our perspective - aka the White Hats did it!!!!
Nonetheless, its a reasoned argument by Doi, addressing what I actually find a bit ridiculous - that Patel would openly and very prominently name the facility where - if he was actually in protection, Kirk was or is...
As for Woods, if people cannot see what he is, well, good luck to them, I say. So, trust a <corrupt> asset to do what a <corrupt> asset would do.
Hopefully, I have clarified my stance. Certainly over-clarified, in far too many words, but whatcha gonna do? Being verbose IS my super-power.
Eye-rollingly yours,
FI.
(PS. If you want to tag a user, you need to use the whole user name, like this:
[u/weholdthesetruths](/u/weholdthesetruths) as opposed to u/wehold, etc.
And if you fractured my fractal handle on purpose, well, don't I feel a fool for attempting to help a fellow frog when they don't need it... ?)
But.... thanks for responding, anyway!