👉🏻 https://x.com/113official/status/2015201496217088050
👉🏻 https://nitter.net/113official/status/2015201496217088050
The Hidden Empire:
Contrary to popular perception, Klaus Schwab neither founded nor strategically directed the WEF, some of its members rank far higher than him in the globalist pecking order.
It was founded by Otto von Habsburg, who arranged in advance for Kissinger to mentor Schwab as its puppet figurehead.
The Habsburgs were behind Federal Europe and Le Cercle, the latter far higher and more hidden than the WEF in the hierarchy.
The WEF was originally the “European Management Symposium,” and it openly admits: “Klaus Schwab had two important mentors: Henry Kissinger, (his former professor at Harvard,) and Edward Heath, the (symposium’s chair.)”
What connects the Habsburgs to Bauer (Rothschild), and families like Cecil, Saxe-Coburg, Astor, Huguenot Roquefueilles (Rockefeller), Del Banco (Warburg), Morgan, etc, and their senior agents such as Kissinger, Soros, Albright, Gates, etc, are ancient Roman aristocratic lineages, funnelled through orders like Malta, Templar, Garter, Rose Croix, and Jesuits.
Their ultimate authorities include Massimo, Medici/Pallavicini, Farnese/Bourbon-Two Sicilies, Lancelotti, Borghese, Odescalchi, Torlonia, etc.
These represent the apex of a direct lineage from the Roman dynasty.
The Massimo family name even adorns the Fabian Society, echoing Quintus Fabius Maximus.
The British Empire is simply a subset and strong-arm of the Roman Empire.
Thus, the “visible” apex of the globalist structure aligns with the head of the British establishment: the Privy Council, Rhodes-Milner group, and Fabians.
The US, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Israel, and Iran are all examples of British colonies to this day.
“And he who is and remains emperor of the Romans is also emperor of the whole earth” — George Trapezuntios, Greek philosopher, to Mehmet the Conqueror in 1466, after the 1453 conquest of Istanbul.
This same ancient dynasty generated nearly all European (and much other) royalty and aristocracy through the centuries.
Also controlled by Malta is the Rothschilds' Rhodes-Milner group, itself far higher than the WEF (which is one of its many doctrinal and institutional great-grandchildren).
Along with the political Vatican, Crown Temple, Washington D.C., Templars, Garter, Rose Croix, and Jesuit Order, these form the principal apparatuses by which the real heads, who created and own them, run the show.
They're not foolish enough to put themselves on display.
The goal is that people like us never discover who's truly in charge, because the (so-called) elite fears most the world masses uniting and seizing the heads of the snake.
Everything said by Schwab, Fink, Hoffmann, etc., is scripted for them, just as Karl Marx, Lenin, Mussolini, Hitler, and others were fully scripted puppets, put on full display.
I would have to argue that Rome took over Jerusalem's power even before AD 70. The reason is because the Jews had to conscript to Rome. We see this at both ends of the life of Jesus. At the beginning, Joseph and Mary had to travel to Bethlehem for a census. At the end, the requirement for Jesus to be put to death required the approval of Roman Governor Pontius Pilate. It is likely that Revelation 17 and 18 is also describing Rome as it currently exists, and boy does Rome have power. I would also argue that Revelation's time statements are consistent with the rest of the bible as the weeks and months are on biblical time. I think Rome took on the role of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
Ive had it out with Root before on this. He's super convinced kek
I think his position is weak, but he will have to figure that out.
He simply cannot show that JERUSALEM, the annex of Rome, then wiped off the map for 2,000 years and now its some measley little blip in the ME, meanwhile Rome has existed as Papal Rome for the whole time, has global presence and influence, way more money than Israel, I mean emperors submitted to the pope for centuries, and he still says its Jerusalem.
I think this is what you are missing in your analysis: who was the primary audience that John was writing to? It was the 7 churches in Asia in the 1st century. Why would John describe "Rome as it currently exists"? In the year 2026?
Listen - the main difference between you and me is that you are a dispensationalist - right? I am not. Have a nice day!