Real ID doesn’t do that. The democrats have had real time access to who voted and who didn’t vote yet. They used that to vote for the non voters. Sometimes voters would show up and be told that they had already voted. This was happening well before Real ID.
Real ID would be great for voting, except the democrats put in a provision for noncitizen permanent residents and other temporary residents to get Real ID. That needs to be rectified. Either they get a red border that is easy to see or don’t get Real ID at all. With access, they can be purged from the voter rolls. Personally I would make the penalty for a noncitizen voting be death.
I disagree. Real id is inching us towards social credit. Just because demonrats don’t give 2 shits about laws and elections, every single American has to be screened like a criminal? We didn’t break the law so why do we need to be fingerprinted and background checked. I feel the same way about real id as I do about the tsa. Get rid of it. Let the 4th amendment mean something again.
Well - it depends on if AI can know for certain someone will not vote. If they plan on stealing millions of votes this way then probably going to have quite a few cases of duplicate votes just from getting it wrong many times... could these be spotted? would this hit a volume threshold anywhere that would trigger a red-flag? Enough that all political parties would question the results? Just trying to think this out a bit here... how much of an issue is this if mail-in voting is cut down 95% to only legit need (military, etc.)?
Algorithm. So age demographic, location, schooling, ect all that info can be assessed from a Real ID. SO if they target the younger crowd that usually dosn't vote, THe pot smoking hippy type kids, Then. they can use that and Yes AI can get it close to 100% accuracy I bet.
AI can't draw a picture of the alphabet with 100% accuracy at this point... don't get me wrong, I fully expect it to be tried if they could get all of the data, even for certain states or counties... but I don't think it will just go over like there's no fraud happening. We'll all find out soon though
If the voting is purely electronic, your theory is certainly correct and much worse than you are stating.
What matters is who counts the votes.
On the other hand, non voting citizens should be able to see if "they" voted or not and registering them would be a problem for the AI's to overcome.
On the positive side requiring photo identification and proof of citizenship is by the far the most important thing we can do. I think it will turn the electorate from ~50/50 to 70/30 in our favor.
One day, IN PERSON, signature verification…how do they fold the non-voting (attending), virtual voters in?
They don't.
There's conspiracy theories about the people who got that thing in their arms are emitting blue tooth signals.
Real ID is real information for A.I. It consumes information like we consume food. It could also theoretically be attached to currency like crypto.
Real ID doesn’t do that. The democrats have had real time access to who voted and who didn’t vote yet. They used that to vote for the non voters. Sometimes voters would show up and be told that they had already voted. This was happening well before Real ID.
Real ID would be great for voting, except the democrats put in a provision for noncitizen permanent residents and other temporary residents to get Real ID. That needs to be rectified. Either they get a red border that is easy to see or don’t get Real ID at all. With access, they can be purged from the voter rolls. Personally I would make the penalty for a noncitizen voting be death.
Real ID gives them verification that a person is who they say they are and a most recent updated ADDRESS.
I disagree. Real id is inching us towards social credit. Just because demonrats don’t give 2 shits about laws and elections, every single American has to be screened like a criminal? We didn’t break the law so why do we need to be fingerprinted and background checked. I feel the same way about real id as I do about the tsa. Get rid of it. Let the 4th amendment mean something again.
Well - it depends on if AI can know for certain someone will not vote. If they plan on stealing millions of votes this way then probably going to have quite a few cases of duplicate votes just from getting it wrong many times... could these be spotted? would this hit a volume threshold anywhere that would trigger a red-flag? Enough that all political parties would question the results? Just trying to think this out a bit here... how much of an issue is this if mail-in voting is cut down 95% to only legit need (military, etc.)?
Algorithm. So age demographic, location, schooling, ect all that info can be assessed from a Real ID. SO if they target the younger crowd that usually dosn't vote, THe pot smoking hippy type kids, Then. they can use that and Yes AI can get it close to 100% accuracy I bet.
AI can't draw a picture of the alphabet with 100% accuracy at this point... don't get me wrong, I fully expect it to be tried if they could get all of the data, even for certain states or counties... but I don't think it will just go over like there's no fraud happening. We'll all find out soon though
If the voting is purely electronic, your theory is certainly correct and much worse than you are stating.
What matters is who counts the votes.
On the other hand, non voting citizens should be able to see if "they" voted or not and registering them would be a problem for the AI's to overcome.
On the positive side requiring photo identification and proof of citizenship is by the far the most important thing we can do. I think it will turn the electorate from ~50/50 to 70/30 in our favor.