I know. Erika Kirk smiled at the wrong time. The baby cried at the wrong time. People gave too much money to TPUSA. Plenty of evidence. Ask this: Why WOULD Israel care that much about one man's opinion?
Because that man is swaying the minds of millions - its a powerful voice, a calm, rational one, that was beginning to rationalize that we SHOULDNT be supporting Israel
18 days before his assassination he finally started questioning whether or not they can actually be trusted.
Everything that CasuallyObservant pointed out (except for the oddities in human behavior) are completely verifiable facts
I have no idea why Israel would care that much about one man’s opinion. The question I have is why you care so much, to the point of swearing and name calling and having a complete meltdown tantrum when someone disagrees with you. Do you always act this way on here or is it only in regards to this topic?
Charlie had a lot of future White House momentum. It behooved anyone who wanted to cut him down, to do so before he grew more powerful. As a campus touring debate persona, he was easier to “get at” than he would be if his popularity grew. Just a thought.
I know. Erika Kirk smiled at the wrong time. The baby cried at the wrong time. People gave too much money to TPUSA. Plenty of evidence. Ask this: Why WOULD Israel care that much about one man's opinion?
Because that man is swaying the minds of millions - its a powerful voice, a calm, rational one, that was beginning to rationalize that we SHOULDNT be supporting Israel
18 days before his assassination he finally started questioning whether or not they can actually be trusted.
Everything that CasuallyObservant pointed out (except for the oddities in human behavior) are completely verifiable facts
“Six hours? I don’t believe it.” - Charlie Kirk
I have no idea why Israel would care that much about one man’s opinion. The question I have is why you care so much, to the point of swearing and name calling and having a complete meltdown tantrum when someone disagrees with you. Do you always act this way on here or is it only in regards to this topic?
Charlie had a lot of future White House momentum. It behooved anyone who wanted to cut him down, to do so before he grew more powerful. As a campus touring debate persona, he was easier to “get at” than he would be if his popularity grew. Just a thought.
One common enough theory is he was being groomed for office and simply broke away from his donors & handlers desires.
I've no dog in this fight. But, that notion is quickly becoming a normie-sphere talking point.