On top of that, other anons are making a point that a 30-06 on a human target always leaves an exit wound. I know this from experience - Even 223 goes clean through things that are ballistically similar. The ballistics of his death don't add up.
It would seem that the trend continues. Question is, is this just opinionated in-fighting from two different fan base camps or is one side or the other being pushed and prodded to antagonize?
Personally, I guess it doesn't matter. I'm going to question everything anyway as it's in my nature to do so as anon.
I don’t feel like I’m in any fan base. I just like to know the truth. Some people are getting very excited if you question certain mainstream narratives, especially if it brings any shade towards “our greatest ally” ™️
My fren, I say this with all my love because I have exchanged on this topic before and I am at my wits end as to why people follow such an obvious charlatan.
What you call "facts mentioned" are in fact pieces of misrepresentations, rhetorics, lies an outright deception to create a narrative. You only believe they are facts because you dont take the time to verify every single thing she says - which you oughta be doing if you listen to a lot of anyone, regardless of who they are.
Also, note the vindictive replies - these Candace followers dont care that they were lied to, they are angry that he exposed her. This is what I am talking about. If you read comments on her videos or on X, she is creating a vicious cult.
Q taught us to identify these manipulations, yet there is a blind spot where all those lessons are forgotten.
Anyway, I wont be exchanging any further messages with you on this topic because its futile. Be at peace with your choices.
I find Baron Coleman to be of sound mind and quite logical. There exists an abundance of evidence which does not support TR as a lone gunman assassin. The use of patsies by our government to cover the truth is a very real pattern.
The attacks on those who are digging serve as a great gauge. When Fort Huachuca was first mentioned, attacks increased. Now we have learned about an uncomfortable number of ties to Fort Huachuca and the military. Kolvet's brothers, Neff's cousin, Erika and her CIA video. That's a pattern.
When the Egyptian planes were mentioned, attacks increased. Now we see that their transponders were turned on as TPUSA planes were landing. That's a pattern.
Patterns are important. Noticing patterns is an incredibly valuable skill. Will all those data points found be important? Possibly not. But why is there such push back on the digs? That's a pattern which has proven valuable, also.
Let’s not forget the israeli guy who was shouting and making a scene, distracting police and security, who eventually got arrested and turned out to be yet another pedo.
Let’s ignore the fact he was jewish, the security was jewish and the isreali president made that strange denial almost immediately.
Not only that Its now clear that Candy posts blatantly fake emails pretending that its real.
Candy also hated Charlie pretty intensely.
Candy misrepresented Charlie's deep observation of Shabbath into a mockery and made a jungle, and made T-shirts and many well meaning idiots repeat these and believe this to be true.
Candy is making patriots make the mockery of a great patriot whom she hated deeply.
At this point, I am disgusted by anyone who has no clue what Charlie was really about because they never bothered to watch any of his videos, but happily listened to Candy and decided her portrayal of Charlie was the real Charlie. Actually beyond disgusted.
On top of that, other anons are making a point that a 30-06 on a human target always exits. The official (mossad) narrative doesn't make much ballistic sense.
One of his last interviews (before ((they)) took it down):
You know what really makes me sad? There was a time Anons would question everything without letting side one shove it down their throat add truth.
The video clip is from Oct 23 2023, a week after October 7th happened. Yet is being pushed as one of his last videos and so many smart people desperately want to believe anything that confirms their bias.
This video, infact, shatters any narrative that he was"turning against Israel so he was killed" because (((they))) had no problem with him articulating there might have been traitors under Bibi.
I highly urge you to convince yourself by watching his own videos that, regardless of him being frustrated by Jews pulling funding never changed his stance on Israel until the very end.
Intact i urge you to put aside every narrative you have subscribed regarding Charlie and verify everything thoroughly on your own, as if you were doing that research yourself.
If you do so, i promise you, the conclusion you come to would be mind blowing
Yes. I believe that is supposed to be a derogatory term for her to infantilise her and also to dissuade anyone from listening to her.
They talk about psyops in the same breath too.
Some of the stuff she speaks about is batshit crazy, but as I said before, Candace woke my wife up. She speaks to her audience, in simple terms. Her audience is not middle aged men.
But that’s conveniently ignored once she starts leaving the reservation of kosher narratives.
It’s worse than turning his assassination into a mockery, they’re participating in the operation to kill the organization he built.
Almost all of these “influencers” were whisked into existence as instruments of information warfare. Unfortunately, the majority were creations of the DS.
A lot of them fit the definition of absurdist agents. Their purpose is to say and do things that sound like they support conservatives, but deliver the message in a way that makes conservatives look bad. Their real goal is to turn off people thinking about changing their political affiliation to maintain the status quo.
Think back to Owens and the whole “Blexit” episode of her career. I am a lifelong conservative and hearing her say that term back in 2018 made me cringe. And, them listening to her “debate” it, I thought this will never work, it’s too contrived to convince anyone.
Back then I thought she was someone who had an acute need for attention. But, that was about two years before I totally woke up to the world of controlled opposition and its variants. She has a history of saying absurd things that throw some red meat to us conservatives and poison pills to the people who still need to wake up.
I can’t stand listening to Owens- she takes 3 business days to make a point but very few have taken her on issue by issue. They all attack her personally. And yes she has made mistakes.
Let’s not let some inconvenient facts get in the way of the narrative. The gun, the water tower, the hand signals, the ice cream etc.
So now it’s open ad hominem attacks against anyone who notices.
Did that post just earn $7k?
Agreed. Are we getting too close to the Truth.
What a sad state of affairs for an Anon.
It's a sad state of affairs when we sling personal insults instead of add sauces like real pedes.
Before Charlie died, TPUSA administrators were getting anxious about how he was giving Nick Fuentes a platform and started doing their deniable moral panic game: Sauce: https://rumble.com/v711ude-the-charlie-kirk-show-addresses-tucker-carlsons-controversial-interview-wit.html
One of his last interviews (before ((they)) took it down): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLbH9yvn6z0
On top of that, other anons are making a point that a 30-06 on a human target always leaves an exit wound. I know this from experience - Even 223 goes clean through things that are ballistically similar. The ballistics of his death don't add up.
What’s sad is the gaslighting, ignoring facts and ad hominem attacks.
Permalink to comment chain discussing this from a deleted post last week.
It would seem that the trend continues. Question is, is this just opinionated in-fighting from two different fan base camps or is one side or the other being pushed and prodded to antagonize?
Personally, I guess it doesn't matter. I'm going to question everything anyway as it's in my nature to do so as anon.
I don’t feel like I’m in any fan base. I just like to know the truth. Some people are getting very excited if you question certain mainstream narratives, especially if it brings any shade towards “our greatest ally” ™️
Yes, the candies tend to ignore any facts presented to them that does not fit their narrative.
I wonder if there are terms given for referring to people who listen to Carlson, Flynn or other non approved sources.
What about the facts mentioned above, regardless of what any influencer says, do they not count, because they don’t fit with the kosher narrative?
It’s just easier to attack and undermine the messenger than address the obvious discrepancies, as usual.
My fren, I say this with all my love because I have exchanged on this topic before and I am at my wits end as to why people follow such an obvious charlatan.
What you call "facts mentioned" are in fact pieces of misrepresentations, rhetorics, lies an outright deception to create a narrative. You only believe they are facts because you dont take the time to verify every single thing she says - which you oughta be doing if you listen to a lot of anyone, regardless of who they are.
Here is ONE recent proof that she makes up fake receipts so blatantly: https://x.com/PastorMark/status/2027799870447448217
Also, note the vindictive replies - these Candace followers dont care that they were lied to, they are angry that he exposed her. This is what I am talking about. If you read comments on her videos or on X, she is creating a vicious cult.
Q taught us to identify these manipulations, yet there is a blind spot where all those lessons are forgotten.
Anyway, I wont be exchanging any further messages with you on this topic because its futile. Be at peace with your choices.
I find Baron Coleman to be of sound mind and quite logical. There exists an abundance of evidence which does not support TR as a lone gunman assassin. The use of patsies by our government to cover the truth is a very real pattern.
The attacks on those who are digging serve as a great gauge. When Fort Huachuca was first mentioned, attacks increased. Now we have learned about an uncomfortable number of ties to Fort Huachuca and the military. Kolvet's brothers, Neff's cousin, Erika and her CIA video. That's a pattern.
When the Egyptian planes were mentioned, attacks increased. Now we see that their transponders were turned on as TPUSA planes were landing. That's a pattern.
Patterns are important. Noticing patterns is an incredibly valuable skill. Will all those data points found be important? Possibly not. But why is there such push back on the digs? That's a pattern which has proven valuable, also.
Where else should we definitely not be looking?
Let’s not forget the israeli guy who was shouting and making a scene, distracting police and security, who eventually got arrested and turned out to be yet another pedo.
Let’s ignore the fact he was jewish, the security was jewish and the isreali president made that strange denial almost immediately.
Just a cohensidence I’m sure.
Baron Coleman's two most recent podcasts.
Andrew Kolvert presents a fake alibi. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQTPj0Fb4r0&t=9482s Charlie Kirk believes in Conspiracies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1M641cJS0I
For those not familiar with a 30-06:
There is NO PLACE on the human body where a 30-06 will not leave an exit wound.
Lie down. It'll go up your ass and out the top of your head at 100yrds.
Favorite Rifle FOR SNIPERS IN THE 'NAM!!!!!!! When it comes to getting through bushes that is the perfect round to use!!!!!!!
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁
Not only that Its now clear that Candy posts blatantly fake emails pretending that its real.
Candy also hated Charlie pretty intensely.
Candy misrepresented Charlie's deep observation of Shabbath into a mockery and made a jungle, and made T-shirts and many well meaning idiots repeat these and believe this to be true.
Candy is making patriots make the mockery of a great patriot whom she hated deeply.
At this point, I am disgusted by anyone who has no clue what Charlie was really about because they never bothered to watch any of his videos, but happily listened to Candy and decided her portrayal of Charlie was the real Charlie. Actually beyond disgusted.
The majority of podcasters are entertainers. I don’t give a flying monkey’s arse what entertainers say. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm9219306/
Before Charlie died, TPUSA administrators were getting anxious about how he was giving Nick Fuentes a platform and started doing their deniable moral panic game: Sauce: https://rumble.com/v711ude-the-charlie-kirk-show-addresses-tucker-carlsons-controversial-interview-wit.html
One of his last interviews (before ((they)) took it down): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLbH9yvn6z0
On top of that, other anons are making a point that a 30-06 on a human target always exits. The official (mossad) narrative doesn't make much ballistic sense.
You know what really makes me sad? There was a time Anons would question everything without letting side one shove it down their throat add truth.
The video clip is from Oct 23 2023, a week after October 7th happened. Yet is being pushed as one of his last videos and so many smart people desperately want to believe anything that confirms their bias.
This video, infact, shatters any narrative that he was"turning against Israel so he was killed" because (((they))) had no problem with him articulating there might have been traitors under Bibi.
I highly urge you to convince yourself by watching his own videos that, regardless of him being frustrated by Jews pulling funding never changed his stance on Israel until the very end.
Intact i urge you to put aside every narrative you have subscribed regarding Charlie and verify everything thoroughly on your own, as if you were doing that research yourself.
If you do so, i promise you, the conclusion you come to would be mind blowing
👌🙏🏻🙏🏻
Candy? Do you mean Candace?
Yes. I believe that is supposed to be a derogatory term for her to infantilise her and also to dissuade anyone from listening to her.
They talk about psyops in the same breath too.
Some of the stuff she speaks about is batshit crazy, but as I said before, Candace woke my wife up. She speaks to her audience, in simple terms. Her audience is not middle aged men.
But that’s conveniently ignored once she starts leaving the reservation of kosher narratives.
It’s sad. It’s devisive. It’s intentional.
It was a humiliation ritual to begin with. Essentially, the definition of mockery.
Who benefits from him being taken out?
Start there...
When you come up with an answer, dig deeper... until you wind up at the real answer.
It’s worse than turning his assassination into a mockery, they’re participating in the operation to kill the organization he built.
Almost all of these “influencers” were whisked into existence as instruments of information warfare. Unfortunately, the majority were creations of the DS.
A lot of them fit the definition of absurdist agents. Their purpose is to say and do things that sound like they support conservatives, but deliver the message in a way that makes conservatives look bad. Their real goal is to turn off people thinking about changing their political affiliation to maintain the status quo.
Think back to Owens and the whole “Blexit” episode of her career. I am a lifelong conservative and hearing her say that term back in 2018 made me cringe. And, them listening to her “debate” it, I thought this will never work, it’s too contrived to convince anyone.
Back then I thought she was someone who had an acute need for attention. But, that was about two years before I totally woke up to the world of controlled opposition and its variants. She has a history of saying absurd things that throw some red meat to us conservatives and poison pills to the people who still need to wake up.
I can’t stand listening to Owens- she takes 3 business days to make a point but very few have taken her on issue by issue. They all attack her personally. And yes she has made mistakes.