Interesting Comparison
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Both look fake
Neither one looks like my vintage Rand McNally 12 inch lunar globe. I call BS.
auh, just a different camera. lmao
Also, perspective from different locations.
They were also orbiting much further away from the moon than apollo. Like we have newer and better tech, plus I heard they saw a "moon solar eclipse". However the purpose of this mission is no different than Apollo 8,9, and 10.
“Orbiting”
Different zoom I would say.
Different director.
Also perspective from different locations.
Once a liar always a liar. It's hard for me to believe anything anymore
To disbelieve this would be more sane than to believe it.
Fake. Still no stars.....
When do you see the stars here on the ground? Now go to space and tell us when the sun disappears to allow the stars to shine? You would need the cameras in space that you base this can’t see stars so they don’t exist nonsense, to stop looking at earth and turn around….Hubble…James Webb…
What? Space station shows stars all the time. There should be stars.
When I see this I just think the Earth and the Moon must really love each other. It's so beautiful to look at the Earth from there and the moon is so mysterious from Earth.
different altitude from the moon surface.
In the 1968 photo, the moon is sunlit. In the latest pic, that part of the moon is in shade, not sunlit.
If it was in the shade it would be black, pretty sure the flash from their camera didn't light it up :)
Correct. Nikon Z9 at 53,000 ISO vs. Hasselblad 70mm at 1/250th second. Literally night vs. day.