When the term: global economy is mentioned, it fails to mention where the real pain starts to become visible. Simply, by looking at who is left behind ( spoiler: EU)
Yet, in contrast with the Prometean Action this video does not mention the reason for it. It looks at matters through the old lens: Kissinger/Brezinski, and does not touch on maximization of wealth extraction [commodification / financialization] which lead to enslavement and dystopian nihilism. [JD Vance; Hungary]
So, this begs the question: who is the source .... ?
And perhaps, exactly what it does not mention may prove to be pertinent to the answer tot hat question.
And not quite. It is an accounting metric. How and where that money is used is a different matter.
For instance: We could LABEL the outlays for a contingent of troops stationed in Germany as costs to NATO, OCCUPATION, or something else.
And there are ways to relabel outlays onto NATO to argue meeting the 2% or 5% threshold. For instance, it would not surprise me if EU/NATO countries involved in the Ukraine war try to sell their "solidarity" as a NATO outlay.
Good points. My thought was the creator of the video doesn’t see the whole board and doesn’t know the historical background, but they’re still sensing the endgame.
I liked the visual aspect of the geopolitical results, helps me visualize what’s actually going to be the end result of the Donroe Doctrine.
Indeed!
When the term: global economy is mentioned, it fails to mention where the real pain starts to become visible. Simply, by looking at who is left behind ( spoiler: EU)
Yet, in contrast with the Prometean Action this video does not mention the reason for it. It looks at matters through the old lens: Kissinger/Brezinski, and does not touch on maximization of wealth extraction [commodification / financialization] which lead to enslavement and dystopian nihilism. [JD Vance; Hungary]
So, this begs the question: who is the source .... ?
And perhaps, exactly what it does not mention may prove to be pertinent to the answer tot hat question.
22 trillion to NATO. This version of the world economy fails to mention this tidbit.
True.
And not quite. It is an accounting metric. How and where that money is used is a different matter.
For instance: We could LABEL the outlays for a contingent of troops stationed in Germany as costs to NATO, OCCUPATION, or something else.
And there are ways to relabel outlays onto NATO to argue meeting the 2% or 5% threshold. For instance, it would not surprise me if EU/NATO countries involved in the Ukraine war try to sell their "solidarity" as a NATO outlay.
Bookkeeping is a rather talmudic exercise.
Yes. Good reason non bookkeepers need to examine fungible funds (grin).
Very good observations and points, fren...
Good points. My thought was the creator of the video doesn’t see the whole board and doesn’t know the historical background, but they’re still sensing the endgame.
I liked the visual aspect of the geopolitical results, helps me visualize what’s actually going to be the end result of the Donroe Doctrine.
Are you suggesting that Trump’s administration is setting that up, or that the globalists were, or that you can’t tell?