Not sure on his reasoning, but I think it is showing us who is truly part of the Great Awakening, and who is willing to throw it all out over being offended by a tweet. I think the mods should ban anyone who is critical of this. I think things would get a lot less contentious around here, and we could focus more on what really matters, which is sorting through intel drops and supporting President Trump, our command in chief, as soldiers on the digital battlefield.
I think things would get a lot less contentious around here
I do not think this would necessarily be a good idea. The last thing we need is a group-think silo. Robust discussion in good faith, presentation of contrasting viewpoints, argument and counterargument - these are an important part of continuously honing one's critical thinking skills and working collectively to uncover real truth and valid information.
We are not commentators or simple civilians. We are soldiers. When we question orders and the integrity of our commander, it not only reflects poorly on us, but it destroys cohesion. There is a reason why militaries make it a crime to publically criticize a superior. We already deport users who do not abide by these rules, I think it should be a little stricter. You say that group think is bad, but I say it is efficiency and oneness of purpose. If you are right, then debate and discussions is unproductive and should be avoided.
If applying critical thinking, start here:
"When Trump posts something, its for a reason."
What do you think is the reason here?
Not sure on his reasoning, but I think it is showing us who is truly part of the Great Awakening, and who is willing to throw it all out over being offended by a tweet. I think the mods should ban anyone who is critical of this. I think things would get a lot less contentious around here, and we could focus more on what really matters, which is sorting through intel drops and supporting President Trump, our command in chief, as soldiers on the digital battlefield.
I do not think this would necessarily be a good idea. The last thing we need is a group-think silo. Robust discussion in good faith, presentation of contrasting viewpoints, argument and counterargument - these are an important part of continuously honing one's critical thinking skills and working collectively to uncover real truth and valid information.
We are not commentators or simple civilians. We are soldiers. When we question orders and the integrity of our commander, it not only reflects poorly on us, but it destroys cohesion. There is a reason why militaries make it a crime to publically criticize a superior. We already deport users who do not abide by these rules, I think it should be a little stricter. You say that group think is bad, but I say it is efficiency and oneness of purpose. If you are right, then debate and discussions is unproductive and should be avoided.
The globalists are trying to infiltrate the MAGA movement, since wokism is pretty much dead, and trying to create division within MAGA.
Just a guess.