and i bet they all vote democrat.....

She says there are 350K dead people on the voter lists, and the host asks if she means 350k actual votes, or is it 350k dead people still listed as voters? She says they are not votes, they're dead people who are still listed as voters.

I volunteer every election and run my local precinct now and in 2024 along with the list of voters there was an addendum of deceased voters to cross reference if needed. There were around 150 names on the list that had an asterisk next to them, and if you checked the big list, it said they were dead and you don't give them a ballot.

I live in a solid blue area that voted in Trump.

Whatever the democrats tell you, it's a lie.

And they don't have to wait in line.

Can somebody find me a robot skeleton? Would love to have it stand in our November election line with a “I vote Democrat” button pinned to its rib cage. 😂💀

"Dead" is the new oppressed minority. Didn't you know?

I wish the article identified the states. I guarantee its rampant in Illinois, Cali, NY, and Minnesota. All the states that are declared blue winners on election day when 1% of votes are counted.

good find, I think these dead people on the voter roles can be used to vote twice, or in voting machines electronic manipulation, their votes can be used at an increased fractional vote for their woke candidates

I don't remember anyone on the left ever saying that dead people aren't on the voter rolls.

They say that there isn't any significant voter fraud where dead people are being used to cast votes. Even the article here makes a distinction between the two things.

There's a huge difference between the two.

It makes no sense to claim there are never any dead people on the rolls. Voter rolls aren't updated in time with deaths. To do so would significantly increase the work demand, thus the cost of maintaining the rolls.

That being said, the rolls should be updated more often than they are because they do create risks for voter fraud. It's interesting to see the numbers given in the article are 350,000 dead voters found in 60 million records. That's somewhere around 0.5% of the rolls being dead voters. Not votes. Voters.

If anyone tried to use this article to convince normies that there is rampant voter fraud, they would quickly turn it around and point out that dead voters on the rolls is not the same as those voters actually casting any votes, AND that even if every single dead voter on the rolls were being used to cast votes, then 0.5% of the voters on the rolls isn't going to significantly alter the outcomes of any elections.

Using this to try to redpill normies is likely to backfire and reinforce their opinion that voter fraud isn't actually a real problem.

It's important to be accurate in these types of argumements and to make certain that you understand what is actually being said in the articles. Otherwise, you end up not only NOT red pilling normies (our main objective according to Q AND this board), but convincing them that the left is correct in things like this.