In early 2026, the United States delivered three sharp blows to strategic assets closely tied to China. U.S. forces captured Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela through a swift raid, ending a regime that owed Beijing billions in oil-for-loans deals. American and Israeli strikes shattered Iran’s leadership and nuclear sites, cutting off another key oil supplier and anti-U.S. partner for China. Meanwhile, Panama’s courts stripped Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison of its control over critical ports at the Panama Canal entrances. These moves were not random—they targeted pillars of China’s global influence: energy security, trade routes, and footholds in America’s backyard.
The irony runs deep. China had invested heavily in these locations as part of its long-term strategy to expand power far from home, expecting them to serve as reliable outposts. Instead, each proved vulnerable. Venezuela’s fall disrupted discounted oil flows, Iran’s defeat exposed the limits of Beijing’s “no-limits” partnerships, and the Panama port seizure weakened China’s grip on a vital global shipping artery. Without firing a shot at Chinese forces, the U.S. dismantled key pieces of Beijing’s network at low cost, highlighting how fragile those overseas bets really were.
China is unlikely to swallow these losses quietly. The most probable pushback will come in the South China Sea, where Beijing holds clear military advantages. Expect faster militarization of artificial islands, aggressive gray-zone tactics against neighbors like the Philippines and Vietnam, and heightened naval confrontations. By escalating in its own backyard, China can project strength, rally domestic support, and remind the world that while America can strike afar, Beijing can make life difficult close to home—potentially raising risks of dangerous miscalculations in one of the planet’s busiest waterways.
China is collapsing. Millions of people are sleeping in the streets. The CCP is barely holding on as public sentiment is openly hostile. The commie experiment is just about over. How will that affect their foreign policy? Looks like chaos is incoming.
Agreed. Not sure how much longer the CCP is going to be able to keep the facade going. They are out of money to maintain stability so the government is extracting funds anywhere they can. Almost half of their foreign BRI projects are failing and some nations are pulling out of the BRI. The CCP isn't passing out money like they were.
Chinese people, like people of all countries are friends of Trump. Chinese deep state on the other hand will be dismantled.
Privately held idea...Xi was made an orphan by Mao's revolution...he has no genuine good feelings for the CCP ...and he has been playing ball with POTUS since the Forbidden City visit...Xi would like to be Emperor and stuff the Dragon Family's in a hole...hence the lack organized pushback from Xi he wants the British out of the picture and they have been tight with the Dragons since 1800's...he's been part of the plan. But he does have a role in the meantime as the calm Chinese leader in the face of adversity and changing tides.
Very Interesting idea.
I agree with your thesis that Xi is a white hat, but hadn't thought about the value of a calming influence in increasingly turbulent political seas.
The US just signed an agreement with Indonesia that would give the US more access to the Malacca Strait. Also with Morocco - think Gibraltar. Trump is quietly focusing US strategic positioning at critical global choke points. Also, Peru is making moves to gain control back of their own deep water port that the Chinese have a majority stake in. China's economic coercive diplomacy strategy through BRI is being dismantled - especially in the US's backyard.
Panama, Venezuela and Iran were all profit centers for China, or in Iran's case at the least a discounted input. Whatever they spend close to home is a direct outlay that does not generate dividends unless they capture new territory. Sure, they can build up at home, but it will be at a higher economic cost than before, and they're still several steps behind their previous position. Not only that, but tariffs have taxed them further.