If he was legit, he blew his chance to prove that Sandy Hook was a Hoax for once and for all, between 2018 and 2021 in the discovery phase, if he mounted a defense based on proving the statements he made. But he chose not to.
He then confirmed that the SH was 100% real and that he realised that after meeting the parents. This was under oath.
The prosecuters would not allow AJ to defend himself in the Kangaroo Court trial.
This was LEONARD Posner claiming defamation over the PHANTOM son Noah one of the 1st graders shot by another PHANTOM Adam Lanza. Nobody died at Sandy Hook. Noah's photo was on a poster supposedly killed in Afghanistan a year before Sandy Hook.
Noah Pozner picture looks like the young Kyle Rittenhouse, also Veronique Pozner is Rashida Talib...I followed these and other crisis actors, from one event to another...Victoria Munoz, and Christine Linenin are regulars at these staged events...Ferguson MO.."hands up don't shoot" was A-List actor worthy...all the nasties were there! We live in an Actor Based Reality...that's why Trump is using actors too to de-brainwash the masses. Central Casting....our AG is an actor, he HATES child abusers ALOT in one of many of his movies...the WAR is WON, but waking people up is the kicker!!..(I followed through research, not literally) 1776 reset is when the actor shit began..
The prosecuters would not allow AJ to defend himself in the Kangaroo Court trial.
Okay, so I keep hearing people claim this. Here is how a person defends themselves in a defamation trial where you are telling the truth.
During discovery there will be depositions, when the plaintiff lawyer will ask something along the lines of "Did you do extensive research and come to the conclusion that Sandy Hook was 100% hoax"
You would answer it truthfully and say "Yes, I do"
The plaintiff would then introduce evidence whatever they think is necessary to prove Sandy Hook was real
You then introduce into evidence all the red pills you have to dismantle each and every one of those claims.
That specific timestamp shows that exact question being askwed and you can see what the response is. Instead of backing up the claim and opening the gates to submit your evidence, the lawyer keeps objecting on the "formulation" and this is how the entire deposition goes. Infact this is what happened for 3 years from 2018-2021 when finally the judge had enough and when AJ skipped a deposition, ruled against him by default.
I highly urge you to watch the entire deposition (and there are multiple parts) if you believe "Prosecutors would not allow AJ to defend himself in the Kangaroo Court trial"
Please show me ONE PLACE where he actually stands ground on his claim.
There something strange about it, though, because in his schpeel last night at the end he seemed rather defiant. Was that confirmation under duress? Maybe it is a matter of timing. We weren't ready for the truth because the truth has a part to play in the bigger movie, perhaps.
The ruling pretty much took everything away from him. What exact duress would that be? And don't tell me AJ is the kind of guy who would compromise his principles if someone pointed a gun at him (figuratively) - if that were the case he already lost.
I made a timeline that you might find interesting.
That's a great timeline. Thanks. I do not have a reason as to why he did not mount a defense. But I would not be surprised that if he is/was a Mossad asset that he had been taken over by the White Hats and that he was told it was not time to divulge the truth. To help quell the situation he bowed out with his statement under oath that he agreed that it was not a hoax. Last nights final statement from him was directly opposite that under oath statement. Perhaps his punishment from the WH's was that he would lose his empire, and to be spared he had a role to play. It's been a long time since I reviewed the SH info, but there were too many questions... why so many of the murdered students seemed to be alive; why the school building was not functional or being used, supposedly, at the time of the attack; the footage of the emergency management drill with people walking in a pattern through the buildings; and other unanswered questions regarding mysterious lottery-like money flowing into the community. So, I am not convinced it was real, and I lean towards it being a hoax, and I have no idea why AJ didn't defend himself.
other unanswered questions regarding mysterious lottery-like money flowing into the community
I am glad you mentioned this, because this was one thing I could actually dig into and disprove as disinformation. The claim was that all the parents of those kids were given a free house based on the local government records which was some kind of an accounting database that suddenly should a house for $450,000 or so for each of the parent's addresses.
Looked very suspicious and like a smoking gun. Thats when I dug into it, and found that every house in that locality had the same entry because they moved paper recards into a digital system and seeded with initial entries.
This is the kind of stuff that makes thse "conspiracy theories" so frustrating. There are a hundred claims, many of which no one can every verify. But the ones you do verify turn out to be fake.
Its these "great amount of little lies" that can be used to effectively change the way a person thinks about a situation because its very hard to disprove a 100 small lies than one big lie.
I urge you to watch all his depositions. Hours of them for 3 years. Not once does he actually stand up and say "Yes Sandy Hook was a hoax and I can prove it"
If he was legit, he blew his chance to prove that Sandy Hook was a Hoax for once and for all, between 2018 and 2021 in the discovery phase, if he mounted a defense based on proving the statements he made. But he chose not to.
He then confirmed that the SH was 100% real and that he realised that after meeting the parents. This was under oath.
The prosecuters would not allow AJ to defend himself in the Kangaroo Court trial.
This was LEONARD Posner claiming defamation over the PHANTOM son Noah one of the 1st graders shot by another PHANTOM Adam Lanza. Nobody died at Sandy Hook. Noah's photo was on a poster supposedly killed in Afghanistan a year before Sandy Hook.
Noah Pozner picture looks like the young Kyle Rittenhouse, also Veronique Pozner is Rashida Talib...I followed these and other crisis actors, from one event to another...Victoria Munoz, and Christine Linenin are regulars at these staged events...Ferguson MO.."hands up don't shoot" was A-List actor worthy...all the nasties were there! We live in an Actor Based Reality...that's why Trump is using actors too to de-brainwash the masses. Central Casting....our AG is an actor, he HATES child abusers ALOT in one of many of his movies...the WAR is WON, but waking people up is the kicker!!..(I followed through research, not literally) 1776 reset is when the actor shit began..
“tacos for noah”
🙄🙄🙄
Okay, so I keep hearing people claim this. Here is how a person defends themselves in a defamation trial where you are telling the truth.
During discovery there will be depositions, when the plaintiff lawyer will ask something along the lines of "Did you do extensive research and come to the conclusion that Sandy Hook was 100% hoax"
You would answer it truthfully and say "Yes, I do"
The plaintiff would then introduce evidence whatever they think is necessary to prove Sandy Hook was real
You then introduce into evidence all the red pills you have to dismantle each and every one of those claims.
Here is what happened in AJ trial:
Alex Jones deposition part 1, timestamped
That specific timestamp shows that exact question being askwed and you can see what the response is. Instead of backing up the claim and opening the gates to submit your evidence, the lawyer keeps objecting on the "formulation" and this is how the entire deposition goes. Infact this is what happened for 3 years from 2018-2021 when finally the judge had enough and when AJ skipped a deposition, ruled against him by default.
I highly urge you to watch the entire deposition (and there are multiple parts) if you believe "Prosecutors would not allow AJ to defend himself in the Kangaroo Court trial"
Please show me ONE PLACE where he actually stands ground on his claim.
There something strange about it, though, because in his schpeel last night at the end he seemed rather defiant. Was that confirmation under duress? Maybe it is a matter of timing. We weren't ready for the truth because the truth has a part to play in the bigger movie, perhaps.
He got slapped with such an insane fine that it just further proves to me it was totally a hoax.
AJ is part of the hoax.
the lawsuit is part of the hoax.
now they can point to AJ as “proof” SH is real
The ruling pretty much took everything away from him. What exact duress would that be? And don't tell me AJ is the kind of guy who would compromise his principles if someone pointed a gun at him (figuratively) - if that were the case he already lost.
I made a timeline that you might find interesting.
That's a great timeline. Thanks. I do not have a reason as to why he did not mount a defense. But I would not be surprised that if he is/was a Mossad asset that he had been taken over by the White Hats and that he was told it was not time to divulge the truth. To help quell the situation he bowed out with his statement under oath that he agreed that it was not a hoax. Last nights final statement from him was directly opposite that under oath statement. Perhaps his punishment from the WH's was that he would lose his empire, and to be spared he had a role to play. It's been a long time since I reviewed the SH info, but there were too many questions... why so many of the murdered students seemed to be alive; why the school building was not functional or being used, supposedly, at the time of the attack; the footage of the emergency management drill with people walking in a pattern through the buildings; and other unanswered questions regarding mysterious lottery-like money flowing into the community. So, I am not convinced it was real, and I lean towards it being a hoax, and I have no idea why AJ didn't defend himself.
I am glad you mentioned this, because this was one thing I could actually dig into and disprove as disinformation. The claim was that all the parents of those kids were given a free house based on the local government records which was some kind of an accounting database that suddenly should a house for $450,000 or so for each of the parent's addresses.
Looked very suspicious and like a smoking gun. Thats when I dug into it, and found that every house in that locality had the same entry because they moved paper recards into a digital system and seeded with initial entries.
This is the kind of stuff that makes thse "conspiracy theories" so frustrating. There are a hundred claims, many of which no one can every verify. But the ones you do verify turn out to be fake.
Its these "great amount of little lies" that can be used to effectively change the way a person thinks about a situation because its very hard to disprove a 100 small lies than one big lie.
So, he lied under oath?
He LIED probably to keep his family and himself alive. Leonard Posner (Tiny Hat)
I urge you to watch all his depositions. Hours of them for 3 years. Not once does he actually stand up and say "Yes Sandy Hook was a hoax and I can prove it"
Here is a good example