THIS IS WHY PDJT POSTED FOR EVERYONE TO READ THIS BOOK! President Trump is the Rightful King! đź‘‘
Tying in President Trump's posts on his Royal Bloodline. (Very Condensed version)
One of Trump's post led to a book title Elizabeth II and the details of the book states:
"The throne came to her
(truthsocial.com)
đź’Ą BOOOOOOM đź’Ą
What I also find fascinating is the Stuart bloodline... It never was wiped out.
I'm of that ilk.
Yes!
Interesting. One comment on Nitter said that Melania is a descendant of the Romanovs. Have you heard of this before? Is there proof. Until Trump posted, I never imagined that he was a cousin of Charles III
Yes...I've read this for years! Hoping someday we have proof...
He is related through his mother. That's a lot of generations with no sons. And the Windsors aren't a direct line to the Tudors. James was a Stuart. Macbeth was a bow to the new king after Elizabeth's death.
After the protestant revolution, there were no Catholics allowed on the throne, so after Queen Anne died childless, the British made the German George their king.
when did they take up the name windsor?
WW I, I think.
Yes, then they stripped Victoria's grandson of royal status, though they KEPT their OWN! Germany was stripped of noble titles [for better or worse] but the Brits still have a House of Lords!
~Kaiser Wilhelm II was related to Queen Victoria; he was her grandson through his mother, Victoria, Princess Royal.~
Not inbreeding, exactly, but when you consider Harry, marrying 2nd and third cousins has to contribute to the IQ problem...
HA! My kid went to a private school and studied history. Said, re inbreeding: that is why the British men are so ugly!
Of course royal inter-marriage also caused other disorders.
Such as the Hapsburg jaw, which caused an extreme under-bite which actually impeded their ability to eat.
~The Habsburg jaw refers to a genetic condition known as mandibular prognathism, characterized by a protruding lower jaw. This trait was notably prevalent among members of the Habsburg dynasty due to their extensive intermarriage, which led to various genetic disorders.~
Thank you. Excellent proof of my thesis, which I have been spouting since Charles was a young man.
There is no unbroken British royal line in any case. Internecine warfare, killing off their own relatives to get the power of the crown. Just one example where the legitimate heir was bumped off:
"The royal nephews, Edward V and his younger brother Richard of Shrewsbury, were placed in the Tower of London in 1483 by their uncle Richard, Duke of Gloucester, who later became Richard III. They were intended to await Edward's coronation, but they mysteriously disappeared and were never seen again."
I am sick of hearing about the Elizabethan Era, as though the literary achievements of Shakespeare occurred because of her, rather than despite her! Of course the authors had to write glowing attributes to her in their introductions!
Mary Queen of Scotts was bumped off by her relative Queen Eliz. "Mary, Queen of Scots, and Elizabeth I were first cousins once removed." So when she needed help, just put her in the Tower?
The Stuarts were Catholic. Their legitimate rights to the crown were denied. That is why the Brit royalty had to go to their German Protestant relations, not because they had the best claim to the throne.
In a nutshell: look at history. British Royalty is fake&ghey. I cannot imagine why anyone gives them any credibility as a Royal Line, worthy of emulation! They grasped power anyway they could: murder of legitimate heirs, warfare, anything and everything. FIE upon them FIE! And Yes they are / were as German as the Kaiser.
The last day that the 92 remaining hereditary peers could vote in the House of Lords was April 30. As of May 1, the 2026 reform of the House of Lords has taken force, so they have the House of Lords, but it’s completely different from the church traditional system. https://electoral-reform.org.uk/hereditary-peers-have-left-the-lords-for-the-last-time/
OK so it just happened! thx!
July 17, 1917, as a way of distancing themselves in the public's eye from the King of Prussia. They were facing a public uprising, so King George and his advisers devised a plan to make Britain forget that the family were usurpers.
I thought it was about then. Amazing how they got away with this charade.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/116490493540315586
https://nitter.poast.org/i/status/2050352825755144276
'PRINCESS OF ORANGE' I am bettin the dark side knows who he (Really) is and hence their 'orange man bad' thang.
Beginning to make more & moar sense ...
fascinating posts about Pres. Trump’s ancestry, Joys1D!
Margaret of Wessex (Queen and wife of K. Malcolm III going a little further back) = a daughter of Agatha whose ancestry is a mystery - genealogists have a few different theories.
Margaret was born in Hungary. Her family returned to England as her father had been exiled. M.’s brother elected king in 1066 after the Battle of Hastings, brother Edgar Aethling was not crowned though. The family fled north & she married in 1070.
further backin Pres. Trump’s lineage from Margaret’s mother has genealogists contemplating a few possibilities, the theory with the best supporting evidence is
Agatha = a daughter of Yaroslav the Wise, Prince of Kiev - imagine if Pres. Trump = a legit. prince of Ukraine [edit see redto-skipper’s correction below]
No prince of Ukraine. Prince of Rus.
https://www.ancient-origins.net/history-ancient-traditions/kievan-rus-0013926
And, These cities up north East were all tied into Hanse League.
The title of Orange is a disputed title.
So, yeah ... It is fake and ghey .... optics.
thanks for the correction, and reading that Yaroslav aimed for a unified Slavic peoples, Prince of Rus sounds right
Thank you skipper! 👏🫡
Extremely dasting Malachi! đź‘Ź