🔴Trump TS - Lifetime Contribution Per Immigrant
(media.greatawakening.win)
- POURING HEAVY SALT -
Comments (10)
sorted by:
WWWWWaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
Wacist fascist poo-poo head.
Out of these choices... I'd allow in the Latin Americans. They have better food and music, which adds to the entertainment value. :>)
Next choice would be Caribbean, for largely the same reasons.
Nothing worthwhile comes from Africa. The food sucks and the music sucks.
What does this actually mean? Like taxes paid vs concessions given? Just trying to understand what these numbers mean.
A broad overview. It’s how much economic value an immigrant from that region can be expected to generate. Taxes paid etc. With whatever Taxpayer funded services they can be expected to consume subtracted off the total.
The end result being immigrants from much of the rest of the world are a net drain on average.
With only really Europe, Parts of Asia (IE Japan, Korea, and parts of China), and or European dominated states. USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc. Being net benefits. In that they can be reliably expected to generate more than they consume.
It can be broken down somewhat further. By nationality as one example. Much of the net benefit in Europe for instance is primarily focused around Western European nations. With Eastern Europe either breaking even or coming out behind depending on the exact country.
It’s broaching topics the post WW2 Zeitgeist deemed verboten and offensive to discuss. Topics that frankly are probably long overdue to talk about.
Only a couple countries have actually done the research and calculations. In part given the difficulty questions and prevailing Western Cultural Zeitgeist. This particular batch of data is I believe sourced from the Netherlands.
AI is that you?? Lol I'm kidding. Thank you for breaking this down. I suppose I could have gotten there if I wasn't so lazy. I was showing my wife and didn't have a good response. Regardless of the numbers, (as an engineer) I always just look at the ratios or baseline) it's obviously skewed but some folks like a lot more contextually. You da man
Here's the study: https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/17569/the-long-term-fiscal-impact-of-immigrants-in-the-netherlands-differentiated-by-motive-source-region-and-generation
They only took 1st generation immigrants .... But the figures are worse when looking over the span of 3rd and 4th generations ...
NL: 20 years: on average: 225.000 per year immigration (low balling it otherwise the population cannot grow from 14.5 in 2000 to 19 in `26) * 167.000 =>
sounds about right: bankrupt.
Add to that other lefty hobbies....
Globalists also know these numbers well. Time to start suing every Zionist person, NGO, Corporation who push mass migration. They are trying to bankrupt all the White Christian Nations.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/116517971613241979
Disgusting
A brief explanation for the curious. It’s a breakdown of how value an immigrant from a given region can be expected to generate. Taxes paid, hours worked etc. Versus how many taxpayer funded services they can be expected to use subtracted off that
The end result being as a broad overview. Essentially Western/Northern Europeans, Asians (China, S. Korea, Japan) , Americans and heavily European dominated regions etc. Are generally either net benefits or just about break even. The exact degree can vary depending on country