That seems to have been the trick. They just released coof a few years ago, however it happened, yes? And, something did indeed get out there that was worse than ordinary cold / flu. Was it a “virus” or was it a “poison” (“virus” is Latin for “poison”)?
A similar situation.
Was the “vaccine” (Latin for “pertaining to cattle”) the solution, or was that something else? What do “The Powers that Should Not Be” see us as? Awful strange that they chose the term “vaccine”. “But it was developed by observing cow pox!” Mm, that’s a nice story they’ve told us.
They’re real good at magic tricks and hypnotism (Latin for “to put to sleep”, what is this board called?)
In the case of polio, go read up on how the “virus” works, and details of the vaccine release. Awful coincidental that we had a polio stricken President right before the vaccine came out, wasn’t it? What was the recovery rate? What was the rate of long term effects? What was the rate of permanent disability? What year was the vaccine released? What caused polio? (not a “virus”. Pay close attention to detail while reading). What two things started happening shortly before the vaccine was released? What did Europe have some of, but we did not?
They do say what caused it, if you read carefully.
Vaccines are supposed to give us immunity to “viruses”, though, since “viruses” can’t be treated with antibiotics (bacteria do exist, and unlike viruses, can be observed)
This isn’t part of what I looked into, so don’t take this as part of my claim if it turns out to be a bad hunch, but it just occurred to me that I don’t remember ever hearing about polio historically. What if it only got released sometime after the Civil War? May be worth looking at.
Long story short, it’s a BIG rabbit hole. I started out looking into polio out of anger at the claim that viruses weren’t real. The longer I looked….
Iif you get to a point of feeling open to the subject, I can’t tell if you’re defensive here, I can send you the debate that put the cricket in my hat.
I previously saw evidence that suggested that polio was caused, or perhaps “transmitted”, by fecal exposure.
Your take would make sense why i don’t recall hearing about it prior to the 1900’s though, which was the exact gap I was keying in on with my comment.
Maybe it was both - initial DDT / Lead Arsenic introduction, sanitation transmission. Could also explain the less severe cases, as opposed to indoor plumbing, migration to city, and adoption of the car helping to reduce poop exposure.
I previously saw evidence that suggested that polio was caused, or perhaps “transmitted”, by fecal exposure.
If that were true, you would have to explain what was in it, and what the mechanism was that would cause paralysis.
Don't go to "muh virus," as that has already been debunked. So, it would necessarily be something else, which would need to be described and explained.
OTOH, we have photos and documentary evidence from recent history of the DDT and Lead Arsenic spraying, along with a total ban on DDT in 1979.
Those chemtrails are probably a similar thing, though maybe less toxic (but still toxic), and could be part of the reason so many people get sick -- especially if in certain areas and at certain times.
Something that needs to be investigated further, as RFK, Jr. has accused DARPA of purposely doing it.
Yeah, I don’t buy the “virus” bunk, either, but “transmission” is still a thing with poisons, and poison expulsions, and exposures to poison receptacles - feces and some measure of the detritus and bacteria in it and perhaps the DDT / Lead-Arsenic of your claim being the poison in the case of that claim.
Terrain theory all the way.
I think we’re on the same boat here, I’d just previously looked at a different potential causative agent. Your DDT/LA claim was new to me. I then stated “perhaps both were involved”, precisely because the LA especially could be tied to the paralysis. The feces may have been a vehicle for the other poisons.
Point was, for the OP who didn’t re-engage, “the causative agent wasn’t invisible Hitlers floating around in the air”, but some collection of toxins, and “being treated as cattle” has no proven evidence of addressing toxicity.
That seems to have been the trick. They just released coof a few years ago, however it happened, yes? And, something did indeed get out there that was worse than ordinary cold / flu. Was it a “virus” or was it a “poison” (“virus” is Latin for “poison”)?
A similar situation.
Was the “vaccine” (Latin for “pertaining to cattle”) the solution, or was that something else? What do “The Powers that Should Not Be” see us as? Awful strange that they chose the term “vaccine”. “But it was developed by observing cow pox!” Mm, that’s a nice story they’ve told us.
They’re real good at magic tricks and hypnotism (Latin for “to put to sleep”, what is this board called?)
In the case of polio, go read up on how the “virus” works, and details of the vaccine release. Awful coincidental that we had a polio stricken President right before the vaccine came out, wasn’t it? What was the recovery rate? What was the rate of long term effects? What was the rate of permanent disability? What year was the vaccine released? What caused polio? (not a “virus”. Pay close attention to detail while reading). What two things started happening shortly before the vaccine was released? What did Europe have some of, but we did not?
They do say what caused it, if you read carefully.
Vaccines are supposed to give us immunity to “viruses”, though, since “viruses” can’t be treated with antibiotics (bacteria do exist, and unlike viruses, can be observed)
This isn’t part of what I looked into, so don’t take this as part of my claim if it turns out to be a bad hunch, but it just occurred to me that I don’t remember ever hearing about polio historically. What if it only got released sometime after the Civil War? May be worth looking at.
Long story short, it’s a BIG rabbit hole. I started out looking into polio out of anger at the claim that viruses weren’t real. The longer I looked….
Iif you get to a point of feeling open to the subject, I can’t tell if you’re defensive here, I can send you the debate that put the cricket in my hat.
Read my post above.
There was no "release" of anything.
It was DDT and Lead Arsenic, used to control mosquitos. Trucks came through the streets and kids played in the spray.
Some of them got sick because of it, not realizing what was really going on.
I previously saw evidence that suggested that polio was caused, or perhaps “transmitted”, by fecal exposure.
Your take would make sense why i don’t recall hearing about it prior to the 1900’s though, which was the exact gap I was keying in on with my comment.
Maybe it was both - initial DDT / Lead Arsenic introduction, sanitation transmission. Could also explain the less severe cases, as opposed to indoor plumbing, migration to city, and adoption of the car helping to reduce poop exposure.
If that were true, you would have to explain what was in it, and what the mechanism was that would cause paralysis.
Don't go to "muh virus," as that has already been debunked. So, it would necessarily be something else, which would need to be described and explained.
OTOH, we have photos and documentary evidence from recent history of the DDT and Lead Arsenic spraying, along with a total ban on DDT in 1979.
Those chemtrails are probably a similar thing, though maybe less toxic (but still toxic), and could be part of the reason so many people get sick -- especially if in certain areas and at certain times.
Something that needs to be investigated further, as RFK, Jr. has accused DARPA of purposely doing it.
Yeah, I don’t buy the “virus” bunk, either, but “transmission” is still a thing with poisons, and poison expulsions, and exposures to poison receptacles - feces and some measure of the detritus and bacteria in it and perhaps the DDT / Lead-Arsenic of your claim being the poison in the case of that claim.
Terrain theory all the way.
I think we’re on the same boat here, I’d just previously looked at a different potential causative agent. Your DDT/LA claim was new to me. I then stated “perhaps both were involved”, precisely because the LA especially could be tied to the paralysis. The feces may have been a vehicle for the other poisons.
Point was, for the OP who didn’t re-engage, “the causative agent wasn’t invisible Hitlers floating around in the air”, but some collection of toxins, and “being treated as cattle” has no proven evidence of addressing toxicity.