Get the kids into INDOCTRINATION CENTERS early!!!

This is why schools indoctrinate.

People don't really have opinions about a lot of things. They kind of know their parties line,but don't know are care that much. These people can be convinced. I lived in Oklahoma when the majority of the state switched from Democrat to republican.

Its a K9 term. Wjat a dog learns first he learns best. Dogs do not have critical thi king skills so they are conditioned to llearn best what is first even though through technique classical conditioning can be modified and even extincted. Himans are the same but tondonit they have to still be thinking as low as a dog. Which is to say not at all. Critical thinking and humility over come the "LAW OF PRIMACY"

I used to believe in Law of Primacy but then I changed my mind.

In order to change peoples minds does it need to be in a fast fashion or slow? I'm thinking it will be a slow process to change their minds because they need to be shown, in a drip, drip, drip fashion so to no have their heads explode. Maybe this is the reason it has taken Q ten years to begin having folks understand all of the governmental theft of money and votes. If you go on a national television news show one time and yell, "the vote was fixed", most folks will roll their eyes and wonder which turnip you jumped off. But if you quietly say, "Hey, I think something is fishy with the vote" day after day without implying one side or the other is the culprit, that enables normies to make up their own minds. Thus Q has been slow and steady with his posts and people on GAW carry the water to the masses.

with overwhelming evidence

This is insufficient. While I think it is probably helpful, I'm not even sure it's all that important. (I'll get back to that.)

and others around them accepting the new information

The number of people who believe something new ("converts") is also helpful, but it is trivially countered by "counter evidence" if there is a sufficient support structure for the original beliefs (dogma e.g.), no matter how sound, or unsound that evidence is, for or against respectively.

maybe it can eventually be more than 3%

While I am suggesting this is insufficient, the "critical mass" to push people into a position where they can even begin to adopt a new position appears to be about 20%. That's 20% within the domain of the current position. In other words, if say, Muslims were to adopt a new position than their dogma (Sunni Muslims e.g.), it would take 20% to already have adopted a contrary position before the rest could possibly start to follow, otherwise it would be trivially stamped down and the "heretics" would at best become a new box of controlled opposition (and more likely utterly destroyed unless it was useful to keep them around). I used Sunnis as an example (to be less likely to offend someone here). Insert your favorite dogmatic position here. My investigation suggests that all apply.

"You can't TELL people; you have to SHOW them."

I suggest you must show the Truth for it to be meaningful. What you show is just as important as how closely it aligns to the Truth ("resonates" in the fundamental sense). I further suggest that EVERY SINGLE DOGMA YOU THINK IS TRUE IS COMPROMISED (on every level).

Having said that, my investigation suggests that ALL dogmas in "opposition" (which is what all of them are) contain the actual Truth (in this case I define that as the "Primary Teaching/Knowledge"). That Primary Teaching has been obscured within each dogmatic system by focusing on the details, assuming the details of the dogma are Primary when they are not.

I can trace every single dogmatic system across the whole world to a single source, and in each case they do exactly that. They all contain the Truth (that's how it sells), and they all purposefully obfuscate the Truth, shoving the Primary into one of the various secondaries, and then pretending the secondary is the primary.

I could (and have) elaborated, but it doesn't work. Why? Because people already KNOW the truth; their Primacy.

Having said that, my investigation suggests that Q (et al) knows the Truth (or at least, is based on the Primary Teaching). While that teaching is in there with what Q said to a fair extent, it is NOT contained explicitly (or at least not as clearly as it needs to be) in what Q said, rather, I found it in deep dives in related investigations.

What I think is happening is that Q is showing the Primary Teaching by teaching it. They pushed enough people to start investigating, and in 2020, they pushed that start to force it into Critical Mass (20%). From that position they engaged into a war of attrition. Every red pill takes from one side and moves to the other (the beginning of their intended end game). No one moves from that "other side" back to the start. So it's win-win. It just takes time and a crescendo towards resonance with the Truth.

• So it takes sufficient evidence, but that is completely insufficient, and indeed, it can create false conclusions, even using nothing but the truth, if that is the intent.

• It takes 20% that is already close to the side you are already on pushing towards the desired change. (Not 3%, but 20%, and already "converts".)

• It also takes this resonance with the Primary Teaching, and that is barely even been addressed yet in the broader scope, though I have seen quite a few subtle hints that have pushed some percentage towards the required victory for We The People. Maybe it's 20% by now, but I don't think so (though it might be close). But that's only the beginning, there's a long way to go to wide spread adoption the next revelation.

Having said that, it appears to be excellerating.

Eddie Bernays……knew all about this.

It is now weaponized on all of us via cia / msm / pop culture…….all day / every day.

This is the MAIN danger of the MSM (fake news) because so many people hear the story there first and then no matter what facts and truths are presented afterward, people just don’t want to believe it. This is what President Trump is up against.