But does it matter? What's the point? It doesn't really matter unless Steyer kicks Hilton out, which is extremely unlikely (thought that would be very entertaining if it happens).
But...
Could this continuing push for more votes, which will almost certainly go past a week after the election, be the "obvious cheating" we need to show people the truth? Done in a way that no one can deny? At a time when it doesn't actually matter or change anything?
Whatever is happening, I guarantee that the evidence of fraud is timed for a reason, long before the actual gubernatorial election. Why now instead of in 5 months? I don't know, but it's for a reason.
Pretty sure the playbook is to kick both Spencer and Hilton using "curated" mail in ballots and then have a democrat run off a show of force and to show that the republicans are declining.
If we are going past the usual "investigating" and "warnings", then it makes sense to tackle the primaries as it's a lot easier to reverse the rullings as opposed to someone who is already elected. See Kari Lake and her Arizona governor/senator campaigns.
Someone pointed out in a comment to another post. Why do the left wing mail in ballots always seem to help the 3rd place candidate more than anyone else?
BWC...THAT is a question I have been asking myself...what the hell is it with turd-place if the cheat is on and the ballots are stuffed???? The ONLY thing I can figure out is to keep the races "close" but at the same time keep the unwary to vote NO MATTER what. In this way, the voting public does not see the shenanigans BEHIND the scenes, and the "cheaters" can point to the fact that ALL THE VOTES COUNTED...the "stuffed ballots" SKEW THE RESULTS IMMENSELY!!!!!
Mail takes 1-3 days in state. And they were flying ballots by helicopter. Getting around mail fraud? That is why they have drop boxes.
But does it matter? What's the point? It doesn't really matter unless Steyer kicks Hilton out, which is extremely unlikely (thought that would be very entertaining if it happens).
But...
Could this continuing push for more votes, which will almost certainly go past a week after the election, be the "obvious cheating" we need to show people the truth? Done in a way that no one can deny? At a time when it doesn't actually matter or change anything?
Whatever is happening, I guarantee that the evidence of fraud is timed for a reason, long before the actual gubernatorial election. Why now instead of in 5 months? I don't know, but it's for a reason.
I think it's necessary so that martial law is fully implemented by November. Possibly starting in California.
Pretty sure the playbook is to kick both Spencer and Hilton using "curated" mail in ballots and then have a democrat run off a show of force and to show that the republicans are declining.
If we are going past the usual "investigating" and "warnings", then it makes sense to tackle the primaries as it's a lot easier to reverse the rullings as opposed to someone who is already elected. See Kari Lake and her Arizona governor/senator campaigns.
Someone pointed out in a comment to another post. Why do the left wing mail in ballots always seem to help the 3rd place candidate more than anyone else?
BWC...THAT is a question I have been asking myself...what the hell is it with turd-place if the cheat is on and the ballots are stuffed???? The ONLY thing I can figure out is to keep the races "close" but at the same time keep the unwary to vote NO MATTER what. In this way, the voting public does not see the shenanigans BEHIND the scenes, and the "cheaters" can point to the fact that ALL THE VOTES COUNTED...the "stuffed ballots" SKEW THE RESULTS IMMENSELY!!!!!
CA election fraud will be proven.
National security will be invoked.
Voting is secure.
You can't tell the people, you must show them.