Okay we all know the fix is in for CA. It's almost as blatant as the 2020 election, if not even more so. However, many of us are probably wondering what is going on behind the scenes as well.

We all know trump and his admin have their eyes on both the gubernatorial and mayoral elections going on there. But, for the sake of argument, what if these primary elections don't actually matter at all, but are instead merely a vector to validate the claims of mass election fraud?

What the elections have that is suspect

1. If it isn't fraud, then Bass is winning apparently by using the Biden 2020 election campaign strategy, namely not being visible in office and doing all she can to hide from anyone out there on socmed. But, let's be honest, we all know she only won on mail in ballots. In person votes are for Pratt, as they are the least fraud ridden vector available.
2. The stats of the post election day activity is retarded. Entire vote drops with zero Pratt ballots. The third place candidate winning series of drops by wide margins after other drops had her in third for several drops in a row. The probability of such things is negligible for individual one off events, and basically statistically impossible for all at the same time.
3. Whistleblowers have already flagged this with the federal government as having fraud.
4. It's the first time I've seen any federal agency investigate an election or set of elections at such a stage or such a level. National elections? Sure. But these are local elections and state level ones, not national ones. Thankfully there is a vector for a valid and lawful investigation at a federal level, but it is only because the idiots are using the mail.
5. We also have the socmed stuff saying people outside California got ballots, sometimes multiple ballots due to married and maiden names.

What are the next steps?

What we should look for as a result of these rediculous results coming in? Well, it is moderately dependent on what happens after this mess.

Positives? They used mail in bailots for a lot of fraud. Again, these people are stupid. As such, it becomes a federal matter to address, so something is likely to at least be investigated here rather than just covered up. We also have the immediately filed investigations with the DOJ. Both are positive events that need to be treated as ways to victory rather than defeat. There is also the USPS related EOs that are active which could be a game changer.

Finally we have the maybes:

• the recent SCOTUS case could cause problems for counting past election day, though this may happen too late in the game.
• Same for the fact the Save act finally got past the senate at last. It is another too little too late scenario for this specific election, but hopefully will impact November.

Now, there are two elements that need to considered, namely:

• can they prove their was fraud? (likely yes)
• can they prove the fraud impacted the election results with significance (this will get a little tricky, but again, given what we are seeing, it is probable)
• can they prove either of the candidates who benefited from the fraud did so knowingly or participated?

That last one is the hardest to prove. That will need corroborated evidence like emails or proof of organising the actions directly. This might exist, but it wont be dug up quickly.

What are the likely outcomes?

Option 1: worst case scenario. This election becomes another Arizona, where no one goes to jail, no fraud is proven in law, and the courts and state basically dismiss the cases. Even this scenario has a silver lining. This will show corruption exists, is systemic in that state, and should be a focal point for the federal government to watch in November. Worst option for CA, but it gives us some chance of showcasing to the country that the system truly is broken.

Option 2: the courts refuse to allow this election to be certified until an audit is done. Pratt and Co will have to file challenges and show that there are discrepancies that cannot be ignored. Given CA and the corrupt nature of it, this is if anything the most likely outcome. It gives a fighting chance to those disaffected by the fraud.

Option 3: the fraud is proven beyond all reasonable doubt to have occurred and to have impacted the election, and the courts force a new election. This has several possible sub-options:

1. Bass and the other one that no one can remember but is now in second are removed from the ballots. This will only happen if it is proven they were directing or had prove able knowledge of the scheme of fraud in play. Least likely scenario, but the one most of us actually want.
2. A full, independent audit is performed with any fraudulent ballots removed. More likely but also not my expectation.
3. Another election is held with the previous one thrown out. This is probable the most likely, and in some ways a best case scenario. If it is done this way and happens after a favourable "no counting after election day" ruling by SCOTUS, with some actual oversight by federal officials, there won't be a repeat of the current situation.

But Why is this even being allowed to happen this way?

So this I feel I can answer with some certantity. I'm fairly sure Pratt is clued in too on this. The purpose of CA is to show people the fraud exists and how it is done. Then, when they do that, it will get tied back to 2020 as a "oh shit the MAGA crowd wasn't crazy" moment. It is also interesting to me that Pratt in particular looks abnormally comfy about how this whole thing has been playing out.

In any case, by showing:

• the mail in ballot fraud is non-trivial
• the non-citizens voting is non-trivial
• the non-resident in the state issue is non-trivial
• the ballot "curation" concept is systemic
• the term "election fortification" means "organised election fraud"
• the Democrats have a massive election fraud scheme going on
• that counting for weeks after an election isn't a sign of election integrity but rather a sign of malfeasance

We have a good chance of making sure that:

• this early election is dealt with
• we establish real protections fr9m election engineering and fraud
• we get CA out of the hellscape it has become.

The reality is, like Q said, sometimes you have to show people what is happening rather than just tell them. They have to see it with their own eyes, even if said images are force fed to them via the Ludovico Technique of A Clockwork Orange fame. Otherwise, people have a tendency to bury their heads in the sand.

Conclusion

Look, we know here that fraud isn't just likely in this election, but that it should be so obvious that even monkeys at the zoo can see it. However, we are talking about California, the land of fruits and nuts. Something is unlikely to follow common sense in this situation. We are also biased and hyper-vigilant due to the past events of 2020. As such we need to be careful and ask for the right things: investigations, audits, etc. Not just wave the "they are cheaters" flags and hope this time people listen. That won't work.

I don't know what the outcomes will be in Cali. Given it is Cali, I'm not particularly filled with hope that anything will change anytime soon. We might get nothing from the investigation. We might have a "we investigated ourselves and found us innocent" scenario. We might get slaps on the wrist or scapegoats with no real changes, or claims the fraud was not significant. We've had such arguments and events before.

Or... we might actually get what we want to see - what happens to fraudsters when mass fraud is committed AND PROVEN in us elections under the Trump administration.

Regardless of what happens, I feel the lyrics to this song have been encapsulating much of my feelings of this whole year, this election cycle included. However I do feel that we are leaving the "long lonely road" that's "a little rocky", and are finally heading to a "dream surreal sublime". It's only a matter of time. After all.....

NCSWIC. NOTHING!!