I asked a question in today's General Chat earlier, and bubble_bursts recommended I make that question and his answer into its own post, so here we go.
(first, my original question)
Forgive me, but I need to be reminded of one of the basics of this movement.
A common criticism I hear from haters is "He calls himself Q Clearance Patriot, or Q for short. Q clearance is a clearance level within the Department of Energy. What does THAT have to do with anything?"
And I've never been able to shake that question. It's a good point.
If this is a military op, why the Department of Energy?
I know there's an answer for this. I just need to be reminded what it is.
(and now the answer, courtesy of u/bubble_bursts)
Uranium One was what started all this. (Read the full board of the day of the first q drop for me details)
That is the origin of Q and that's where we are headed to disclosure in Iran. Full circle
Q drop 48 was also linked by someone in response to my question, and it looks important:
Whoever or whatever Q is seems to know the future. Now bear with me for a minute. What if Q is not a person or group but a future version of a certain AI who figured out how to transmit info from the future. When you start bringing quantum mechanics, satellites, and AI into the chat, it is entirely possible for something like that to happen. At that point even time travel isn’t necessary for someone to know this info because only the data traveled through time.
When asked, Q corrected that they didn't know the future, but had the control to make the future play out the way they are planning.
Q also noted some disinformation is necessary
What a convenient line to throw around when something doesn't fit a follower's pre-conceived notions.
It's a real beauty, ain't it?
Sigh. If only finding our way to the truth were that easy (use whatever premise is convenient, as opposed to actual hard-core analysis and evidenced-based reasoning).
For us, there is no future. It hasn't happened yet. And there is no physical mechanism to project a signal into the past. Sorry, but you are living in Hollywood.
The full timeline has already happened. We are just at our allotted point on that timeline. Nothing to do with Hollywood, I don’t watch tv or movies.
Not given us from the future. A lot of popular commentary is recycled Hollywood themes and ideas. Even here.
That’s not quite true. Seeing (or “being shown”) the (or “a”) future is absolutely possible. There’s prophecy (lawful) and soothsaying (unlawful).
Not sure if it’s similarly possible to see the past, but I would presume so.
I think this is better stated as: "it is entirely possible to imagine that something like that could happen".
To state that it is possible is 100% pure conjecture. Do you have any actual proof or evidence that this is possible? (eg. actual results?).
Not to mention that there is a big difference between theoretically possible (conceptual) and actually possible (proven by results).