I asked a question in today's General Chat earlier, and bubble_bursts recommended I make that question and his answer into its own post, so here we go.
(first, my original question)
Forgive me, but I need to be reminded of one of the basics of this movement.
A common criticism I hear from haters is "He calls himself Q Clearance Patriot, or Q for short. Q clearance is a clearance level within the Department of Energy. What does THAT have to do with anything?"
And I've never been able to shake that question. It's a good point.
If this is a military op, why the Department of Energy?
I know there's an answer for this. I just need to be reminded what it is.
(and now the answer, courtesy of u/bubble_bursts)
Uranium One was what started all this. (Read the full board of the day of the first q drop for me details)
That is the origin of Q and that's where we are headed to disclosure in Iran. Full circle
Q drop 48 was also linked by someone in response to my question, and it looks important:
Sometimes, I visualize the facts (truth) as being like a central core of [Y] color, lets, say, which as it spreads, diffuses, on a background of [X] (non-facts, non-truth, fiction).
Close to the core, the facts prevail, and those who position their perspective near the core see mostly facts and the truth (of the thing). But those who are more distance, create their perspective with a combination of [Y] and [X], so that the picture they adopt as real, is actually some truth mixed with fiction.
Out there in the hinterland of anon-dom, or awakeningsville, there are people who have heard of Q or Qanon, who know a few things, and who adopt ideas and views that are barely consistent with the facts.
This sort of diffusion pattern persists across the info-sphere in all sorts of ways, as far as I can see.
It really depends on a person's seriousness and/or intent as to how close to the core they try to position themselves. The real "truth seekers" are the ones who make that effort, to the best of their ability. Others are happy enough to just push a little, or a mild way, or (sadly) not at all.
From this perspective, what you say is likely to be true: wild fantastic theories on Q clearance (and all sorts of other things) will persist.
Something something about leading horses and water and stuff....
That is one fantastic metaphor.
Very well put. I see it as a nuts and bolts approach. Take a big picture point and if followed through to core pieces the big picture makes more sense and viability of it is more clear. The minutia of things seems to be too cluttered for most to partake in assessment and therefore dissolves away from the perspective of believing truth is spoken. However truth was there just not with actual conviction since it lacks the aspect of creation, the nuts and bolts of why it is. I like the linear (color gradiant) grid relation used in your correlation. Even more value using that logic if adding a z-axis (perhaps alternate or adjacent absolutes) for 3rd dimensional perspective.
Yes, very much agree, and think that the 3-axis model works as well as any 2-axis one. Indeed, I first conceived of the core as being like a sun in the middle of space, and the diffusion occurring outwards in 3 dimensions.
Indeed. Visualization tools to draw conclusions and outcomes is grossly under developed, by design, imo for mass practice. Critical thinking drives that practice along with a need to know, questioning attitude. Unfortunately that seems to be a minority attribute amongst society(s) anymore
I think there is actually (probably) a lot more of it (critical thinking, need to know questioning attitude) than used to exist.
It's just that as the challenges to the brainwashing have arisen, the brainwashing work (and effort) has increased dramatically as well.