Yet another reason to hate the Medical-Pharma-Regulatory complex. Let's MAHA faster.
The excerpt below includes "28 states where you can refuse vaccines on essentially any grounds — religious, conscientious, or philosophical: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin. Some have a simple form you can fill out but they don’t like to tell you such forms exist."
Additional links and text-images in the original.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/even-grok-admits-no-us-pediatrician
Executive summary
Aaron Siri recently interviewed Joel Warsh, a US pediatrician who noted *his unvaccinated patients are MASSIVELY healthier than his vaccinated patients*. See 5:50 in the video. MASSIVELY.
What!?!? We are told we must vaccinate our kids to keep them healthy!
Yet there are nine studies published in the peer-reviewed literature, say that unvaccinated kids are healthier than their vaccinated peers. None show the reverse.
The definitive study done at Henry Ford Health System found exactly the same thing. The primary author of that study Marcus Zervos admitted on hidden camera in the movie “An Inconvenient Study” that it was a good study but if he published it, his career would be destroyed. So they decided not to publish it so that they could keep their jobs. I reached out to their CEO and asked him if he had seen the movie. He stopped talking to me at that point.
But the question is, what does Grok think?
So I asked.
The Grok admission
The result: We have no evidence from any pediatrician in America that vaccinated kids are healthier.
All of the publicly reported comparisons, have indicated that the unvaxxed kids are healthier. 100%, just like the papers in the literature. The anecdotes match the papers.
Not a single pediatrician in the entire United States has ever observed that their unvaccinated kids are sicker than their vaccinated kids. Nowhere in the U.S.
. . . The Simonsen NIH study couldn’t be more clear. There was a drastic increase in flu vaccine uptake over a long period of years and yet there was no decrease in mortality during flu season. Zero. They looked very hard to find any benefit whatsoever and found nothing.
The NIH was pissed. They refused to allow the authors to talk to the press about their study showing all these doctors were wrong. That’s why you never heard about the study. But reporter Sharyl Attkisson found the one study author who didn’t work for the NIH. Her story is stunning. They know it doesn’t work and they don’t want YOU to know.
A similar study in 2020 (the Anderson influenza discontinuity study showing a massive discontinuity in flu uptake at age 65 creates no discontinuity in flu deaths) confirmed that result using a different methodology. These studies don’t matter. Trying to get doctors to change their mind based on data is like talking to a brick wall.
AlterAI agreed with me that no amount of data would convince Ninio that flu shots don’t work. It’s a stunning read. Evidence and data don’t matter.
Summary
All the evidence that we have shows that unvaccinated kids are healthier.
However the medical community believes the opposite and they ignore the data that they are wrong.
Trying to convince them with data that they got it wrong is fruitless. You are arguing scientific data versus belief. Belief always wins.
That is why we have state laws forcing people to vaccinate our kids. Because no amount of data will ever convince these doctors that they got it wrong.
The good news is that there are still 28 states where you can refuse vaccines on essentially any grounds — religious, conscientious, or philosophical: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin. Some have a simple form you can fill out but they don’t like to tell you such forms exist.
I recently discussed this with Bryan Ardis. Who didn’t know about the form in his own state (Tennessee) and tells a really interesting story (at 18:00) about what happened after he learned about the exemption form; he found nobody knew it existed.
Note: There are no mass deaths of unvaccinated kids in these states that allow people to opt out of vaccination.
The right thing to do, of course, is to opt out of vaccination. Your kids will thank you for it.
If you like my work, please consider supporting me so I can continue to expose the truth.
I can confirm this by my own observations in my patients. I had a cohort of families that were essentially off grid. They grew a lot of their own food, limited electronics usage, didn't vaxxinate, and homeschooled their kids. Those kids had none of the childhood problems usually seen in most practices that have sadly now been accepted as "normal." Not a single unvaxxinated kid had any kind of learning deficit or autism spectrum disorder. No allergies, stomach issues, recurring colds and flus, or skin issues. These were normal healthy kids and they were polite, well mannered, and seemingly well adjusted. What does that tell you? Of course their well being cannot all be attributed to the fact that they were unvaxxinated. But it is all part of a broader picture of just simple good healthy living and family structure. I found the observed differences strikingly profound.
Wow. Thanks for sharing your experience, mac1221.
The pharma-medical cartel has knowingly ruined millions of lives, for profit. "They won't be able to walk down the street" seems ever-more realistic.
You are most welcome. Not all of us practitioners are in lock step with the machine. It is difficult though. We are forced to keep our heads down because most of us don't have the clout or the financial resources to publicly make a stink. In fact, it is a minefield to navigate - staying one step ahead of the state licensing board that can strip a provider of a career that took an investment of many years and lots of money.
I discovered the dark side of vaxxines early on in my career. In fact, I was still in school when I started reading the scant research on the topic and it disturbed me. It's certainly not something we are taught. I managed to get into a practice where we managed to stay off the radar. Not a huge practice, but making tons of money was not the objective. I didn't have a schedule that was overbooked to the point of delivering insufficient or short changed assembly line care. That is why many of my patients came to see me. They knew I would honestly educate them and they could trust me to tell them the truth. Unfortunately, when Covid hit, I saw early on the direction where it was all headed and decided it was time to bow out. At least I still have my license. There was no way I was going to poison my patients. I had managed to stay clear before given my vaxxine stance. But the pressure was ramping up to a level I have never seen before and there were few avenues to take if you refused. We all saw how practitioners were persecuted that dared to buck the party line. I could retire, so I did.
Thank you for taking the time to lay out this information that some may not be so familiar with. This battle is far from over.
"They grew a lot of their own food, limited electronics usage, didn't vaxxinate, and homeschooled their kids. "
That's the formula right there.
I completely agree.
And this is the EASIEST comparison test to make. Match ages and backgrounds, VAXXXT and UNVAXXXT, BOOM, direct results to review. Can you guess why it's NEVER done?
Save as number 265 in my shity vax file.
It’s rotten down to the journals. All journals retract studies suggesting vaccines are dangerous.
Paediatricians must then say “there’s no studies to suggest vaccines are dangerous”
Bookmark
Grok can't "admit" anything, it does not think, therefore it cannot "withhold" information. It is a LANGUAGE MODEL and as such prioritizes coherent english over facts. An AI being factually correct is an ACCIDENT. AI is not a source.
If we forced 100% transparency, virology as a medical field would fall in a very short time