If I hand my friend heroin and tell him it’s insulin, and he dies, I’m going to prison. 🚔
The court won’t care what I called it.
The court will care what it was.
The court will care whether I misrepresented the product.
The court will care whether my friend gave informed consent based on truthful information.
Now compare that to COVID.
If an ordinary citizen misrepresents a substance and someone is harmed, there can be criminal charges, civil lawsuits, financial liability, and public outrage.
But when pharmaceutical companies told the public they were receiving a “vaccine” while simultaneously discussing mRNA technology in gene therapy terms, disclosing gene-therapy classification risks to investors, and using technology that delivers genetic instructions into human cells, the public was expected to simply trust the label.
And when people were injured?
No criminal charges.
No accountability.
No jury trials.
No discovery.
No ability to sue in civil court because of PREP Act immunity.
No compensation through the CICP for the overwhelming majority of injured people.
In fact, many vaccine-injured Americans can’t even get their day in court.
Think about how insane that is.
If I deceive one person about what’s in a syringe, I can lose my freedom.
If a trillion-dollar industry misrepresents information to millions of people, those harmed are often denied both criminal accountability AND civil recourse.
One standard for ordinary Americans.
Another standard for the most powerful corporations on Earth.
Whether you’re pro-vaccine, anti-vaccine, or somewhere in between, everyone should agree on one thing:
No informed consent exists without truthful information. And no justice exists when those who are harmed are denied any meaningful path to accountability
I believe they've switched all vaccines over to mrna without telling anyone. How would we know, we don't have access to a lab for analysis even if we could get samples of all the vaccines?
They are quietly making shifts. Not just with humans, but also in veterinarian medicine.
Very few even ask what's in the syringe, and when they do ask, they are told it's just a vaxxine - nothing to see here. They have already been conditioned to except it even though it contains a completely different platform of poison than what they were given before which were bad enough. They are not told the newer delivery platform changes their body on a genetic level. It's not even a vaxxine. It's something completely different - a medical device. Absolutely no informed consent or accountability.
They need to be eliminated including corporations that are adding chemicals in our foods. We should all buy food in farmers market, clothing from real cotton or wool etc. No shots to our animals, including our meats.
Denial of informed consent wasn't confined to big pharma. Public health agencies, OSHA, and every corporation that forced it on their employees must be included.
Something is causing the increase in diabetes.
Take care of that first. Pancreatic peptides. Remove chemicals in the food and stop mass vaccinations. Regular deworming. There are people who have used doxycycline and Fenben and lowered their A1C
I was involved in a study of doxy about 20 years ago specifically researching just that - does Doxy lower A1C levels. Doxy at antimicrobial levels, 100mg/twice a day, does lower A1C levels, but the effects are temporary. A couple of months after discontinuation of the doxy, levels will creep back up. This is especially when no other meaningful changes are made, like diet and physical activity.
The big problem is that antimicrobial doses of doxy lead to antimicrobial resistance. Not good. Antimicrobial resistance can be deadly. However, there is a sub-antimicrobial dose of doxy out there as a generic that does not have antimicrobial effects - 20mg/twice a day. At that dose the doxy specifically provides anti-inflammatory and anti-collagenase effects without exerting antibacterial activity or disrupting normal flora. The drug was originally developed as a treatment for gum disease. I was involved specifically with regards to its effects on lowering A1C. It makes sense that since many chronic conditions are linked to systemic inflammation, the applications could be endless.
One of the effects I noted in some of my patients was an improvement in certain inflammatory skin conditions - like acne. I had one patient that jokingly said that if I took the medication away she'd kill me. She had chronic adult acne that was recalcitrant with other treatments. Skin improvements are noticeable fairly quickly. More internal improvements however are not so obvious, therefore requiring more study. But that is where the rub comes in.
Sadly, because the drug has been available generically since it went off patent, there has not been a lot of research into its effects at that dosage. Its uses remain more theoretical and not thoroughly studied. No money to be made to justify the research. When the drug was taken off patent, it was like someone flipped a light switch how fast it all ground to a halt. Something so promising remains mostly buried.
If I hand my friend heroin and tell him it’s insulin, and he dies, I’m going to prison. 🚔
The court won’t care what I called it.
The court will care what it was.
The court will care whether I misrepresented the product.
The court will care whether my friend gave informed consent based on truthful information.
Now compare that to COVID.
If an ordinary citizen misrepresents a substance and someone is harmed, there can be criminal charges, civil lawsuits, financial liability, and public outrage.
But when pharmaceutical companies told the public they were receiving a “vaccine” while simultaneously discussing mRNA technology in gene therapy terms, disclosing gene-therapy classification risks to investors, and using technology that delivers genetic instructions into human cells, the public was expected to simply trust the label.
And when people were injured?
No criminal charges.
No accountability.
No jury trials.
No discovery.
No ability to sue in civil court because of PREP Act immunity.
No compensation through the CICP for the overwhelming majority of injured people.
In fact, many vaccine-injured Americans can’t even get their day in court.
Think about how insane that is.
If I deceive one person about what’s in a syringe, I can lose my freedom.
If a trillion-dollar industry misrepresents information to millions of people, those harmed are often denied both criminal accountability AND civil recourse.
One standard for ordinary Americans.
Another standard for the most powerful corporations on Earth.
Whether you’re pro-vaccine, anti-vaccine, or somewhere in between, everyone should agree on one thing:
No informed consent exists without truthful information. And no justice exists when those who are harmed are denied any meaningful path to accountability
I believe they've switched all vaccines over to mrna without telling anyone. How would we know, we don't have access to a lab for analysis even if we could get samples of all the vaccines?
They are quietly making shifts. Not just with humans, but also in veterinarian medicine.
Very few even ask what's in the syringe, and when they do ask, they are told it's just a vaxxine - nothing to see here. They have already been conditioned to except it even though it contains a completely different platform of poison than what they were given before which were bad enough. They are not told the newer delivery platform changes their body on a genetic level. It's not even a vaxxine. It's something completely different - a medical device. Absolutely no informed consent or accountability.
Yes, that's why I won't vax another pet.
My fur baby only had jabs at the shelter where I got him. None since.
You sound like a $cience denier.
🤣🤭
They need to be eliminated including corporations that are adding chemicals in our foods. We should all buy food in farmers market, clothing from real cotton or wool etc. No shots to our animals, including our meats.
Denial of informed consent wasn't confined to big pharma. Public health agencies, OSHA, and every corporation that forced it on their employees must be included.
Yup
Same goes for wars. How many times have we been lied to regarding why we are going to war and intended outcomes.
Sinking of the USS Maine
Interesting theory. What should be done with big pharma? Close them all down? Then how will people get their insulin?
Something is causing the increase in diabetes. Take care of that first. Pancreatic peptides. Remove chemicals in the food and stop mass vaccinations. Regular deworming. There are people who have used doxycycline and Fenben and lowered their A1C
I was involved in a study of doxy about 20 years ago specifically researching just that - does Doxy lower A1C levels. Doxy at antimicrobial levels, 100mg/twice a day, does lower A1C levels, but the effects are temporary. A couple of months after discontinuation of the doxy, levels will creep back up. This is especially when no other meaningful changes are made, like diet and physical activity.
The big problem is that antimicrobial doses of doxy lead to antimicrobial resistance. Not good. Antimicrobial resistance can be deadly. However, there is a sub-antimicrobial dose of doxy out there as a generic that does not have antimicrobial effects - 20mg/twice a day. At that dose the doxy specifically provides anti-inflammatory and anti-collagenase effects without exerting antibacterial activity or disrupting normal flora. The drug was originally developed as a treatment for gum disease. I was involved specifically with regards to its effects on lowering A1C. It makes sense that since many chronic conditions are linked to systemic inflammation, the applications could be endless.
One of the effects I noted in some of my patients was an improvement in certain inflammatory skin conditions - like acne. I had one patient that jokingly said that if I took the medication away she'd kill me. She had chronic adult acne that was recalcitrant with other treatments. Skin improvements are noticeable fairly quickly. More internal improvements however are not so obvious, therefore requiring more study. But that is where the rub comes in.
Sadly, because the drug has been available generically since it went off patent, there has not been a lot of research into its effects at that dosage. Its uses remain more theoretical and not thoroughly studied. No money to be made to justify the research. When the drug was taken off patent, it was like someone flipped a light switch how fast it all ground to a halt. Something so promising remains mostly buried.
Bankruptcy and new management...