I mean it is now. It used to be more robust in that the prospective reviewers would both try to find flaws in the data and methodology and even conduct the experiment themselves to try and replicate the results. Before approval. That generation of scientists though has been dead decades.
The issue in modern day is monetary. Sensationalism and ‘shocking’ results get grant money, donors, teaching jobs, and speaking gigs. Colleges and Labs pressure for more output of studies at a faster rate. As it makes their promotional material look better and gets them more money. The Journals also have gone tabloid to an extent and want more headlining studies. The more ‘shocking’ and ‘groundbreaking’ the better.
Like in many things of late. Treating it like a Business and prioritizing the pursuit of profits above all, not to mention the corner cutting, and the conflicts of interest. Is producing counter-intuitive results. Broadly detrimental to humanity as a whole.
The overarching issue is one that is mainly monetary. “Shocking and Sensational Results” get grant money, jobs, and speaking gigs.
Colleges and Schools want their staff’s names on ‘Ground Breaking’ research. It looks better on promotional material for donors and prospective students. It also helps score contracts and other work.
The Corporations and private groups funding studies and “The Science”. Generally want results that both confirm their biases and give them permission to do what they want to do. Food Corporation A wants to save money by using a Synthetic Dye in their snack food instead of a natural one? They’ll get their study that says it’s perfectly healthy and safe. Meanwhile the general public gets to deal with the fact it really was a Carcinogen and the fact little Timmy now has Cancer because the crackers shaped like a cartoon character poisoned him.
Alternative Health Company B wants a study that says their supplement totally stops COVID or spike proteins or whatever. They get their study. Which they then use in marketing.
The Journals have also gotten more readily accessible to the general public. The shock headlines then subsequently sell better to the average layman. It’s a symptom of the Democratization of everything and treating everything as a business and opportunity to make money and scam the general population.
The system is breaking down. Quite fundamentally due to the incentive structures that ironically allowed it to climb to such heights in the first place.
Virtually no "ACTUAL" science is being performed, most especially in medicine. And there's a VERY SIMPLE reason for this. They're absolutely wrong with their "germs-genes-toxins" model of dis-ease causation. it's all based on materialism, which is a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of reality.
The explanation for the cause of all dis-eases is simple, elegant, and obvious. But it's nearly impossible to accept after a lifetime of materialistic brainwashing. The shift from "victim consciousness" to "co-creator consciousness" is too large a chasm to jump it seems....
terrain theory is bunk too....based wholly on MATERIALISM. That's why the establishment allows it to be openly discussed and debated. As long as its materialism, it's acceptable.
The root, the foundation, the beginning of all dis-ease is SUSTAINED DISCORDANT FEELINGS. The degree, duration, intensity and nature of the feeling determines the specific dis-ease presentation.
The simplest of examples - fear, worry, fright, scares land in the respiratory system - nasal, pharyngeal, bronchi, lungs. The deeper the fear, the deeper the dis-ease presentation. The deepest fear, death-fright, lands in the lungs (named "lung cancer"), where temporary excess tissue is generated to improve the individual's ability to uptake more oxygen, as lack of oxygen is the fastest way to die.
Anger-related feelings land in the abdominal region - I can't stomach, digest, handle, eliminate this situation in my life.
Different feelings = different named dis-eases.
Your psyche (subconscious mind) (higher-self), controls every aspect of your body. It doesn't operate in "time". And it takes your figurative thoughts literally. When you feel like you're "going to die" in say 12 months, your psyche hears that as "I'm going to die NOW".
Anyway, a couple basic examples. The highest wisdom available in the world - through channeled resources - agree across the board on this.
St. Germain -> "All dis-ease is caused by discordant feelings"
Jeshua (Jesus - "A Course of Love") - "All dis-ease arises from REJECTED FEELINGS that become stored in the body and manifest as illness when unresolved......all PROJECTED feelings (blame/condemnation/judgment of others) result in the unfortunate circumstances you face in life".
Bashar - Dis-ease is the result of in inharmonious (discordant) life."
Abraham-Hicks (infinite intelligence) - "All dis-eases arises due to RESISTANCE (discordance) to what is".
Either they're all wrong (non-corporeal consciousness) and our mainstream medical establishment is right about their pseudoscientific "germs-genes-toxins" materialistic model. Or, mainstream Western medicine (allopathy) is an end-to-end fraudulent endeavor. Can't be both.
Those brainwashed into mainstream materialism are looking at material effects - bacteria present, genetic mutations, abnormal tissues, and blaming the dis-ease ON what they see at "the scene of the crime". They are unable to explain how and when and why these things happen. They're 10 miles DOWNSTREAM of the answer, frantically focusing on material effects. So too are the terrain theorists, blaming dis-ease on toxins, diets, water, EMFs, mold, etc. but lacking any proof of causation for any single dis-ease. They can't correlate one toxin to one dis-ease presentation. This is because they're mistaken, as are the allopaths (mainstream doctors). All are still locked into their material education.
Your natural state is perfect health. Your natural state is harmonious feelings - peaceful, joyful, at ease, enthusiastic, satisfied, etc. You have been taught that emitting discordant feelings is "NORMAL" and "ACCEPTABLE". But based on who's standards? Those who control the world?
You're free to be angry, worried, hating, blaming, condemning, criticizing, fearful, etc. But the question is, is this "NATURAL" for you? If "feeling good" is "natural", then CHOOSING TO NOT FEEL GOOD< which is what entertaining all these feelings brings, is the mistake the 99% are making. After all, we each CHOOSE how we feel in every moment. It's the one thing nobody else had control over.
Why would anybody CHOOSE to "feel badly"? That's the real question. The answer is, the masses are BRAINWASHED. Monkey-see, monkey-do. We act like what we learned from our family, classmates, TV, movies, etc. But are they all right to behave the way they do? It's certainly "NORMAL", isn't it?
But the question is, is it "NATURAL" to sustain discordant feelings? It can't be. It's learned behavior. Because nobody would willfully choose to feel badly for days/weeks/months/years on end, unless they thought they had a good "reason" - which is the brainwashing operating. They not only JUSTIFY, but DEFEND why they choose to feel badly. They "deserve" to. It's "their right" to feel badly.
So has the brainwashing gone for many centuries. Modern medicine has been around for over 100 years. Everything within it has "improved"....except...the general health of the populations that ascribe to it. Something's rotten in Denmark.
It ain't your diet or lifestyle. It ain't bad genetic luck. It ain't unfortunate circumstances coming into contact with an invisible, imaginary "virus". It ain't a toxin or carcinogen. Nobody has ever proven any of these things "CAUSE" dis-ease...for good reason. They don't.
Dis-Ease in the mind (thinking negative thoughts) leads to....
Dis-Cord in the feelings which leads to....
Dis-Integration of the body....
It's this simple. Convincing the masses is next to impossible. Why? -> "It's easier to fool somebody then convince them they've been fooled".
The masses have been indoctrinated into "trusting the experts". The "experts" are the most brainwashed among us. That's what "higher education" really is - deeper brainwashing.
What if our "experts" are wrong?
Stay tuned over the next 10 years....that's about how long this is gonna take to become popular wisdom. The power and control of the establishment is near total until more humans willfully choose to wake up and stop BELIEVING they need "RULERS". We don't need them. They need us.
Peer review process is just a popularity contest and gatekeeping. Not really scientific from my view.
I mean it is now. It used to be more robust in that the prospective reviewers would both try to find flaws in the data and methodology and even conduct the experiment themselves to try and replicate the results. Before approval. That generation of scientists though has been dead decades.
The issue in modern day is monetary. Sensationalism and ‘shocking’ results get grant money, donors, teaching jobs, and speaking gigs. Colleges and Labs pressure for more output of studies at a faster rate. As it makes their promotional material look better and gets them more money. The Journals also have gone tabloid to an extent and want more headlining studies. The more ‘shocking’ and ‘groundbreaking’ the better.
Like in many things of late. Treating it like a Business and prioritizing the pursuit of profits above all, not to mention the corner cutting, and the conflicts of interest. Is producing counter-intuitive results. Broadly detrimental to humanity as a whole.
hoo boy
Wonder if military is the only way.
Follow the science money.
The overarching issue is one that is mainly monetary. “Shocking and Sensational Results” get grant money, jobs, and speaking gigs.
Colleges and Schools want their staff’s names on ‘Ground Breaking’ research. It looks better on promotional material for donors and prospective students. It also helps score contracts and other work.
The Corporations and private groups funding studies and “The Science”. Generally want results that both confirm their biases and give them permission to do what they want to do. Food Corporation A wants to save money by using a Synthetic Dye in their snack food instead of a natural one? They’ll get their study that says it’s perfectly healthy and safe. Meanwhile the general public gets to deal with the fact it really was a Carcinogen and the fact little Timmy now has Cancer because the crackers shaped like a cartoon character poisoned him.
Alternative Health Company B wants a study that says their supplement totally stops COVID or spike proteins or whatever. They get their study. Which they then use in marketing.
The Journals have also gotten more readily accessible to the general public. The shock headlines then subsequently sell better to the average layman. It’s a symptom of the Democratization of everything and treating everything as a business and opportunity to make money and scam the general population.
The system is breaking down. Quite fundamentally due to the incentive structures that ironically allowed it to climb to such heights in the first place.
The love for money ruins everything.
How can we get a nitter link on this video?
https://nitter.poast.org/MAHA_Action/status/2072440106896511219#m
Thank-you. This will help passing it on.
Virtually no "ACTUAL" science is being performed, most especially in medicine. And there's a VERY SIMPLE reason for this. They're absolutely wrong with their "germs-genes-toxins" model of dis-ease causation. it's all based on materialism, which is a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of reality.
The explanation for the cause of all dis-eases is simple, elegant, and obvious. But it's nearly impossible to accept after a lifetime of materialistic brainwashing. The shift from "victim consciousness" to "co-creator consciousness" is too large a chasm to jump it seems....
Terrain theory vs Germ Theory Tesla vs Edison
terrain theory is bunk too....based wholly on MATERIALISM. That's why the establishment allows it to be openly discussed and debated. As long as its materialism, it's acceptable.
The root, the foundation, the beginning of all dis-ease is SUSTAINED DISCORDANT FEELINGS. The degree, duration, intensity and nature of the feeling determines the specific dis-ease presentation.
The simplest of examples - fear, worry, fright, scares land in the respiratory system - nasal, pharyngeal, bronchi, lungs. The deeper the fear, the deeper the dis-ease presentation. The deepest fear, death-fright, lands in the lungs (named "lung cancer"), where temporary excess tissue is generated to improve the individual's ability to uptake more oxygen, as lack of oxygen is the fastest way to die.
Anger-related feelings land in the abdominal region - I can't stomach, digest, handle, eliminate this situation in my life.
Different feelings = different named dis-eases.
Your psyche (subconscious mind) (higher-self), controls every aspect of your body. It doesn't operate in "time". And it takes your figurative thoughts literally. When you feel like you're "going to die" in say 12 months, your psyche hears that as "I'm going to die NOW".
Anyway, a couple basic examples. The highest wisdom available in the world - through channeled resources - agree across the board on this.
Either they're all wrong (non-corporeal consciousness) and our mainstream medical establishment is right about their pseudoscientific "germs-genes-toxins" materialistic model. Or, mainstream Western medicine (allopathy) is an end-to-end fraudulent endeavor. Can't be both.
Those brainwashed into mainstream materialism are looking at material effects - bacteria present, genetic mutations, abnormal tissues, and blaming the dis-ease ON what they see at "the scene of the crime". They are unable to explain how and when and why these things happen. They're 10 miles DOWNSTREAM of the answer, frantically focusing on material effects. So too are the terrain theorists, blaming dis-ease on toxins, diets, water, EMFs, mold, etc. but lacking any proof of causation for any single dis-ease. They can't correlate one toxin to one dis-ease presentation. This is because they're mistaken, as are the allopaths (mainstream doctors). All are still locked into their material education.
Your natural state is perfect health. Your natural state is harmonious feelings - peaceful, joyful, at ease, enthusiastic, satisfied, etc. You have been taught that emitting discordant feelings is "NORMAL" and "ACCEPTABLE". But based on who's standards? Those who control the world?
You're free to be angry, worried, hating, blaming, condemning, criticizing, fearful, etc. But the question is, is this "NATURAL" for you? If "feeling good" is "natural", then CHOOSING TO NOT FEEL GOOD< which is what entertaining all these feelings brings, is the mistake the 99% are making. After all, we each CHOOSE how we feel in every moment. It's the one thing nobody else had control over.
Why would anybody CHOOSE to "feel badly"? That's the real question. The answer is, the masses are BRAINWASHED. Monkey-see, monkey-do. We act like what we learned from our family, classmates, TV, movies, etc. But are they all right to behave the way they do? It's certainly "NORMAL", isn't it?
But the question is, is it "NATURAL" to sustain discordant feelings? It can't be. It's learned behavior. Because nobody would willfully choose to feel badly for days/weeks/months/years on end, unless they thought they had a good "reason" - which is the brainwashing operating. They not only JUSTIFY, but DEFEND why they choose to feel badly. They "deserve" to. It's "their right" to feel badly.
So has the brainwashing gone for many centuries. Modern medicine has been around for over 100 years. Everything within it has "improved"....except...the general health of the populations that ascribe to it. Something's rotten in Denmark.
It ain't your diet or lifestyle. It ain't bad genetic luck. It ain't unfortunate circumstances coming into contact with an invisible, imaginary "virus". It ain't a toxin or carcinogen. Nobody has ever proven any of these things "CAUSE" dis-ease...for good reason. They don't.
Dis-Ease in the mind (thinking negative thoughts) leads to.... Dis-Cord in the feelings which leads to.... Dis-Integration of the body....
It's this simple. Convincing the masses is next to impossible. Why? -> "It's easier to fool somebody then convince them they've been fooled".
The masses have been indoctrinated into "trusting the experts". The "experts" are the most brainwashed among us. That's what "higher education" really is - deeper brainwashing.
What if our "experts" are wrong?
Stay tuned over the next 10 years....that's about how long this is gonna take to become popular wisdom. The power and control of the establishment is near total until more humans willfully choose to wake up and stop BELIEVING they need "RULERS". We don't need them. They need us.
The inversion is truly astonishing.
Let x=x Laurie Anderson. Got the time? Cause I can see the future. About 70 miles east of here.