I find it QUITE DISGUSTING that you want to pretend that jews were not raping, torturing, murdering, and genociding the White Russian Christians in Russia by the MILLIONS ... during the 1920's and 1930's.
You want to pretend that Hitler just had it in for muh jews and muh rich guys ... FOR NO REASON?
Fuck that.
Berlin and Moscow are about the same distance apart as Kansas City and New York.
The German people KNEW the jews were slaughtering the Russians, and they were coming for the Germans next, and then other Europeans (Whites), and then eventually the Americans.
So, FUCK that dishonest take, pretending you don't know what the jews did to the Germans and the Russians, and you want people to think Hitler was just "crazy."
It is disgusting that you would try to play that game with a stupid meme.
Not to mention, Adolph would not have wanted anything to do with Mamadami, AOC, or any other communist.
He was fighting AGAINST the communists to SAVE HIS PEOPLE from the communist jew scum.
Antifa started in 1920's Germany, NOT 2020's USA.
You seem to have no clue that "socialism" has more than one meaning, and your ignorance puts you on the side of the genocidal jews.
Hitler was not just 'crazy'. He was insane. Surrounded by insane nazi occultists. Oh, and he was not just 'fighting against the communists'. He was a delusional eugenecist, and more than happy to slaughter human beings innocent or not, in pursuit of his vision. And, he was a very useful instrument because of that.
Do you really think that "socialism" has more than one meaning? Perhaps you might share your understanding of the other meanings that apparently the OP has missed?
Your rage at the violation of Christians, Russians, and White folks doesn't in any way exonerate Hitler. (Frankly, to me, it smells of exactly the same sort of justifications that the Bolsheviks used to justify their 'revolution'.)
Hitler + his Nazi crew and the Bolsheviks were simply two sides of the same coin. They were both simply willing to murder, kills and violate and THAT is why they clashed. Two Demonic factions fighting over the same treasure hoard.
By the way, your disgust is opaque, imo. You use a straw-man argument in order to lay justification for your proclaimed disgust. Instead of arguing on merit, you premise your justification of Hitler on this strawman accusation aimed at the OP. Which I dare say would not be necessary if you really had any substance to your reasoning. But maybe that's just me....
Do you really think that "socialism" has more than one meaning? Perhaps you might share your understanding of the other meanings that apparently the OP has missed?
Since you asked
HITLER'S DEFINITION OF SOCIALISM
"A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. ur adopted term Socialist' has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, or efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false."
Adolf Hitlor December 28, 1938
Also dude, you should read up more about ww2, Hitler and the nazi party.
and more than happy to slaughter human beings innocent
Patently false. You have gone crazy drinking msm koolaid.
One, words are easy. Actions are what counts. ALL con artists and megalomaniacs in history have spun beautiful sounding words. ALL.
you should read up more
Two: Right. Tell that to my father's family who lived under Nazi occupation. You are relying on information other people have given you. You've been reading. My information is first hand.
My dad was Dutch. Born and raised near The Hague (southern part of the netherlands). Long-time Catholic family.
He was 8 years old when the Nazi's rolled in and occupied the Netherlands. In a larger Catholic family, his older brothers had to live/sleep under the floorboards in the later years to avoid being taken (kidnapped, literally, tho not kids) by the Germans and enlisted or put to work in camps, etc, in Germany.
To keep warm/cook, the elder brothers had to go out and cut down tree wood at night, because if they were spotted, the German soldiers would have shot them. (weren't allowed to cut down any trees)
In the latter years of the occupation, Germany took ALL the food from the Netherlands, so that the entire population was starving. My dad made forays into nearby market garden areas that had been ravaged, guarded by German soldiers, to try to scramble up potatoes. For several years, his family basically lived primarily on bread with sugar as the only nourishment, (triggering a life-long addiction to sugar).
His stories of, at the ripe old age of 11, finding dead corpses on the banks of the canals were pretty harrowing. And of feeling so guilty because he ran to grab a piece of food and stick it in his mouth when his baby brother dropped it on the floor, because he was a starving kid.
Perhaps some Americans simply think that WW2 was ALL about the Jews, and the (reported) slaughter of Jews. (Putting aside how much of that information is real or not, we know that the Jewish thing in WW2 was orchestrated and used as a pretext to set up the Cabal proxy state of Israel, among other things)
But it was about a LOT more than the Jews. The Jewish thing has been highlighted for obvious reasons (see previous statement). Which doesn't mean it wasn't real, but either way, millions of innocent and non-Jewish people suffered under the Nazi regime during WW2, in all countries, including Germany.
The methods of torture, brutality, etc, used by the Nazi regime are well recorded. Which is not to say all German soldiers were brutes, or evil bastards. Or that other govts didn't employ such methods ever. But the Regime, headed by Old Adolf, was the brutal driving force that destroyed so many lives, including German (non-Jewish) ones.
Like some, I am of the view that the whole Jewish thing has been utilized to create a smokescreen for what has really been going on behind the scenes. By which I mean, the anti-semetic vs. pro-jews dichotomy is simply another case of divide and conquer. But that's another story.
It is terrible that brother fought brother in WW2, just like in WW1 and the Civil War.
But governments are sometimes run by bad men.
The Dutch government was officially "neutral," publicly, with regard to the war between England/France and Germany.
But ... the Netherlands government was secretly helping the British launch a suprise attack on Germany though the low countries.
England was shipping tanks across the Channel and storing them in the Netherlands for that invasion.
Germany figured this out, and that is why they went in to the Netherlands, to head off that attack.
Here is a short video clip of a group of ex-German WW2 soldiers touring a military museum, and they run into a young Dutch woman and have a conversation with her.
She complains that the Germans made her uncles "vanish" (she does not know why, but assumes the worst).
The Germans ask a few questions, and realize that her uncles were "partisans" -- locals who were attacking the occupying German military/police forces.
Such men, if found, were shipped off to prison as prisoners of war, since they were fighting against the Germans, even though not in military uniform. They were guerilla forces, effectively, and subject to prisoner of war treatment.
It sucks, but the Americans did the same to the Japanese-Americans who were suspected of secretly helping Japan during the war.
In the latter years of the occupation, Germany took ALL the food from the Netherlands, so that the entire population was starving.
Right. In the later years of the war, the German people were starving, too, because the allies cut off all supply routes -- including food.
... millions of innocent and non-Jewish people suffered under the Nazi regime during WW2, in all countries, including Germany.
If you watch that video clip, you will see that the German soldiers explained that the communists, who had just murdered White Russian Christians by the millions, HAD TO FIGHT because the jews (communists) were coming for the Germans next.
Here is a timeline post-WW1, where Germany had lost the war and communist jews were running various operations to take over Germany back in 1918-1920 or so.
The methods of torture, brutality, etc, used by the Nazi regime are well recorded.
I question that.
There were German prison guards who were prosecuted by the GERMANS for abuse of prisoners.
There was one German camp commandant who was EXECUTED -- by the Germans -- for abuse.
Those ex-German soldiers explain that such things were not allowed in the German military. But it was common in the jewish communist government of Russia.
The stories of brutality are told by the jews, and much of those stories are either fabrications or actually attributable to the communist jews operating in Poland.
Do you want to see some brutality?
Post WW1, the German/Polish border was redrawn. Many German people who had been "living in Germany" were now suddenly living on their same farm, but they were now "living in Poland" -- under the Polish government, which had been taken over by communist jews (from Russia).
Their land didn't change. The political borders did.
And the Germans living there were subjected to massive rape, torture, brutality and murder/genocide by the communist jews in control of Poland.
Hitler pleaded with other European leaders to help put a stop to this brutality, but nobody would listen.
That's because the English wanted war with Germany. Germany had suddenly become the strongest economy in Europe -- in just 5 years under Hitler's leadership -- and the English leadership felt it was a threat to their economic strength. THIS is the real reason for WW2, or at least one of them.
Finally, Hitler sent his army into Poland to put a stop to the bloodshed, and England/France immediately used that as an excuse to declare war on Germany.
But the Regime, headed by Old Adolf, was the brutal driving force that destroyed so many lives, including German (non-Jewish) ones.
Again, the stories of brutality are told by the jews, not the Germans (who have been mistreated and silenced since the war).
Like some, I am of the view that the whole Jewish thing has been utilized to create a smokescreen for what has really been going on behind the scenes. By which I mean, the anti-semetic vs. pro-jews dichotomy is simply another case of divide and conquer. But that's another story.
Yes, that is "another story," and I will just finish here by saying that jews are NOT semites. They are a mixed race, only partly semitic, and therefore not true semites.
Therefore, the claim of "anti-semitic" is a lie, promoted by the jews (of course, as it has benefited them greatly at everyone else's expense).
It IS truly tragic that your father and his fellow kin had to suffer, along with the other Europeans of the time, and the Americans who thought they were helping, but as Gen. George Patton said, once he realized the whole thing was a scam:
Such men, if found, were shipped off to prison as prisoners of war,
and subject to prisoner of war treatment
If they were lucky. More likely, they would simply be shot. A partisan (combatant) not in uniformed clothing is not protected under the Geneva convention, neither are they "subject to prisoner of war treatment".
the German people were starving, too
So this is the moral justification for starving another country's entire population?
All the other points worth discussing, I'll omit. I can see that you believe what you believe, and I'm not going to try to argue you off it (what would be the point, right?)
I do not buy into the idea that Britain (or British rulers) was blameless or innocent in all this, but neither do I accept the nation that Hitler and the Nazi regime were innocent, were victims, and otherwise wonderful people forced to do bad things because other, more evil people, forced them into it.
As for the examples you cite, Patton (one general), victims, incidents, and more, I think this simply illustrates how any person can take a particular data set and then reach conclusions or make interpretations based on the chosen overriding framework or perspective. By which I mean, one case: M looks at A, C, E, G, and concludes "this means X", when N looks at B, D, F, H and concludes "this means Y". And O looks at ABCDE and concludes "this means Z".
What each person (chooses) to look at, and what conclusions they draw from them, obviously says something about the person and their chosen framework (worldview) as much as it does about the actual available data.
I do not find your argument (aka as laid out here) convincing or persuasive. There is already a plethora of counter-arguments in my mind, but I'm not keen to discuss further a very complex subject with extremely broad ramifications and nuances, as to what we see in the world.
We've both stated our perspective, and position, and made an exchange based on that. As it is, I'd call that a win.
I will mention, however, I think your constant reference to and emphasis on "(communist) jews" (10 times) is a strong indicator. Of what? Well, you decide for yourself.
Although I am not persuaded, I appreciate the effort you made to lay out your perspective. Cheers
Wait until you find out that Hitler was just one if the first historical targets of fake news. He's the original Michael Jackson... framed for the crimes that they themselves were doing. Has the exposure of MSM and education system, taught you nothing yet? Wait until you figure out that everything they've ever taught you is a lie.
I pranked my granddaughter. Told her I knew a guy she’d find irresistible. Described him as an artist, a vegan, an animal rights advocate. She wanted to meet him. Then I told her his name….
Hitler was also an environmentalist before it was fashionable. He heavily promoted windmills to generate electricity. He even promoted biodiesel. It didn’t work, like so many of his plans, but he pioneered government subsidies for alternative energy.
You'd have to be either intellectually dishonest or completely brainwashed to think Hitler just "blamed the Jews for everything". Like the Germans all collectively started hating the Jews for no reason in particular lmao. Go look up the transsexual clinic and all the degeneracy that was being pushed under the Weimar republic and who was behind it.
Right. Hitler wrote all about how the jews were destroying Germany and Russia in his book, "Mein Kampf," and he told everyone who would listen that he would put a stop to it.
Here are 2 rabbis who claim they had "no idea" why "Hitler hated jews."
Then they discovered it was because jews created communism.
And although they don't say it, communism has been the one ideology more responsible for mass murder in the history of the world than any other ideology.
My thoughts go back to Berlin showing clearly what a certain population was doing. It is exactly the same as the same people have been shoving down our "throats" through our eyes and ears now. He built the German nation back to the 2nd most productive people in the world. He did recognize what was happening about a 1000km away and knew it would be expanding once it was done subduing the largely Christian monarchy that existed before the Bolshevics for almost a millenia. The same monarchy that had dealt with a little group of thieves called the name changers... who made their livings and fortunes preying on traders going either directing through their lands... Khazaria. Read all about it in World History if you can dig deep enough to find the truth.
Hitler went mad.... drunk on power? maybe... drug addled from the cocktail of chems he took... lack of animal protein? that would drive me fn insane. But he was a decorated soldier of the so called Great War and bitter over the punishments handed out to the people of Germania.. add to that the evidence that suggests he might be a bastard of the Rothschilds. It is all pretty interesting when you dig and think for yourself instead of relying on opinions from Jews and the jew schooled we see all about us. As the vast majority of scholastic texts is controlled by that same group. As are most of the large school boards that decide on curriculum using a commercial entities offerings. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ is and always has been the root of evil since it was invented God knows when.
Guess which of the Abrahamic faiths ( 1 or 2 might not even be a faith as much as cults) those same Khazars chose when they were forced to choose or die.
... it would be expanding once it was done subduing the largely Christian monarchy that existed before the Bolshevics for almost a millenia. The same monarchy that had dealt with a little group of thieves called the name changers... who made their livings and fortunes preying on traders going either directing through their lands... Khazaria.
I haven't looked into it much, but I suspect the reason the jews wanted to destroy Russia in the early 20th century has to do with how the Russians pushed the jews out of Russia back in the days of Khazaria.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, known for his book, "Gulag Archipelago" where he detailed the horrors of the Soviet gulags, also wrote the book, "200 Years Together" where he went into detail about the death and destruction the jews wreaked on the Russian people for at least 200 years prior to the 20th Century.
It is all pretty interesting when you dig and think for yourself instead of relying on opinions from Jews and the jew schooled we see all about us. As the vast majority of scholastic texts is controlled by that same group.
Let's not forget that Ghislaine Maxwell's father, Robert Maxwell," was a jew, a Mossad operative, and also publisher of history text books for nearly ALL American grade school students.
The false propaganda runs deep.
Not easy to overcome for most people.
See my thread on "The Law of Primacy," which explains why most people have difficulty breaking out of their early brainwashed programming:
Several folks on GAW will tell you that Hitler was the good guy. Came across a couple in the last few hours. Those vets we celebrate see this. We are the news.
You'll notice they insist established definitions "have more than one meaning". That is sad. It reeks of participation trophy. Its loser talk.
I find it QUITE DISGUSTING that you want to pretend that jews were not raping, torturing, murdering, and genociding the White Russian Christians in Russia by the MILLIONS ... during the 1920's and 1930's.
You want to pretend that Hitler just had it in for muh jews and muh rich guys ... FOR NO REASON?
Fuck that.
Berlin and Moscow are about the same distance apart as Kansas City and New York.
The German people KNEW the jews were slaughtering the Russians, and they were coming for the Germans next, and then other Europeans (Whites), and then eventually the Americans.
So, FUCK that dishonest take, pretending you don't know what the jews did to the Germans and the Russians, and you want people to think Hitler was just "crazy."
It is disgusting that you would try to play that game with a stupid meme.
Not to mention, Adolph would not have wanted anything to do with Mamadami, AOC, or any other communist.
He was fighting AGAINST the communists to SAVE HIS PEOPLE from the communist jew scum.
Antifa started in 1920's Germany, NOT 2020's USA.
You seem to have no clue that "socialism" has more than one meaning, and your ignorance puts you on the side of the genocidal jews.
it is quite a pathetic take.
Fucking based.
1000% correct and based. OPs post was low effort and not based in reality.
Hitler was not just 'crazy'. He was insane. Surrounded by insane nazi occultists. Oh, and he was not just 'fighting against the communists'. He was a delusional eugenecist, and more than happy to slaughter human beings innocent or not, in pursuit of his vision. And, he was a very useful instrument because of that.
Do you really think that "socialism" has more than one meaning? Perhaps you might share your understanding of the other meanings that apparently the OP has missed?
Your rage at the violation of Christians, Russians, and White folks doesn't in any way exonerate Hitler. (Frankly, to me, it smells of exactly the same sort of justifications that the Bolsheviks used to justify their 'revolution'.)
Hitler + his Nazi crew and the Bolsheviks were simply two sides of the same coin. They were both simply willing to murder, kills and violate and THAT is why they clashed. Two Demonic factions fighting over the same treasure hoard.
By the way, your disgust is opaque, imo. You use a straw-man argument in order to lay justification for your proclaimed disgust. Instead of arguing on merit, you premise your justification of Hitler on this strawman accusation aimed at the OP. Which I dare say would not be necessary if you really had any substance to your reasoning. But maybe that's just me....
Since you asked
HITLER'S DEFINITION OF SOCIALISM "A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. ur adopted term Socialist' has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, or efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false."
Also dude, you should read up more about ww2, Hitler and the nazi party.
Patently false. You have gone crazy drinking msm koolaid.
One, words are easy. Actions are what counts. ALL con artists and megalomaniacs in history have spun beautiful sounding words. ALL.
Two: Right. Tell that to my father's family who lived under Nazi occupation. You are relying on information other people have given you. You've been reading. My information is first hand.
But each to his own.
Was/is your father a jew?
If not, what ethnicity was/is he?
My dad was Dutch. Born and raised near The Hague (southern part of the netherlands). Long-time Catholic family.
He was 8 years old when the Nazi's rolled in and occupied the Netherlands. In a larger Catholic family, his older brothers had to live/sleep under the floorboards in the later years to avoid being taken (kidnapped, literally, tho not kids) by the Germans and enlisted or put to work in camps, etc, in Germany.
To keep warm/cook, the elder brothers had to go out and cut down tree wood at night, because if they were spotted, the German soldiers would have shot them. (weren't allowed to cut down any trees)
In the latter years of the occupation, Germany took ALL the food from the Netherlands, so that the entire population was starving. My dad made forays into nearby market garden areas that had been ravaged, guarded by German soldiers, to try to scramble up potatoes. For several years, his family basically lived primarily on bread with sugar as the only nourishment, (triggering a life-long addiction to sugar).
His stories of, at the ripe old age of 11, finding dead corpses on the banks of the canals were pretty harrowing. And of feeling so guilty because he ran to grab a piece of food and stick it in his mouth when his baby brother dropped it on the floor, because he was a starving kid.
Perhaps some Americans simply think that WW2 was ALL about the Jews, and the (reported) slaughter of Jews. (Putting aside how much of that information is real or not, we know that the Jewish thing in WW2 was orchestrated and used as a pretext to set up the Cabal proxy state of Israel, among other things)
But it was about a LOT more than the Jews. The Jewish thing has been highlighted for obvious reasons (see previous statement). Which doesn't mean it wasn't real, but either way, millions of innocent and non-Jewish people suffered under the Nazi regime during WW2, in all countries, including Germany.
The methods of torture, brutality, etc, used by the Nazi regime are well recorded. Which is not to say all German soldiers were brutes, or evil bastards. Or that other govts didn't employ such methods ever. But the Regime, headed by Old Adolf, was the brutal driving force that destroyed so many lives, including German (non-Jewish) ones.
Like some, I am of the view that the whole Jewish thing has been utilized to create a smokescreen for what has really been going on behind the scenes. By which I mean, the anti-semetic vs. pro-jews dichotomy is simply another case of divide and conquer. But that's another story.
hth
I suspected that might be the case.
It is terrible that brother fought brother in WW2, just like in WW1 and the Civil War.
But governments are sometimes run by bad men.
The Dutch government was officially "neutral," publicly, with regard to the war between England/France and Germany.
But ... the Netherlands government was secretly helping the British launch a suprise attack on Germany though the low countries.
England was shipping tanks across the Channel and storing them in the Netherlands for that invasion.
Germany figured this out, and that is why they went in to the Netherlands, to head off that attack.
Here is a short video clip of a group of ex-German WW2 soldiers touring a military museum, and they run into a young Dutch woman and have a conversation with her.
She complains that the Germans made her uncles "vanish" (she does not know why, but assumes the worst).
The Germans ask a few questions, and realize that her uncles were "partisans" -- locals who were attacking the occupying German military/police forces.
Such men, if found, were shipped off to prison as prisoners of war, since they were fighting against the Germans, even though not in military uniform. They were guerilla forces, effectively, and subject to prisoner of war treatment.
It sucks, but the Americans did the same to the Japanese-Americans who were suspected of secretly helping Japan during the war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PJkNZ30WV0
Right. In the later years of the war, the German people were starving, too, because the allies cut off all supply routes -- including food.
If you watch that video clip, you will see that the German soldiers explained that the communists, who had just murdered White Russian Christians by the millions, HAD TO FIGHT because the jews (communists) were coming for the Germans next.
Here is a timeline post-WW1, where Germany had lost the war and communist jews were running various operations to take over Germany back in 1918-1920 or so.
https://alphahistory.com/weimarrepublic/weimar-republic-timeline-1918-20/
Also, remember that the jews declared WAR on Germany and boycotted German goods, worldwide, which put a severe strain on their booming economy:
https://imgs.search.brave.com/OEVOmUs-ev2kaKooNRlUj6RracKiul9iHOkQ5NlpTL0/rs:fit:500:0:1:0/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly9hcmNo/aXZlLm9yZy9kb3du/bG9hZC9qdWRlYS1k/ZWNsYXJlcy13YXIt/b24tZ2VybWFueV8y/MDIwMDYvanVkZWEt/ZGVjbGFyZXMtd2Fy/LW9uLWdlcm1hbnku/anBn
I question that.
There were German prison guards who were prosecuted by the GERMANS for abuse of prisoners.
There was one German camp commandant who was EXECUTED -- by the Germans -- for abuse.
Those ex-German soldiers explain that such things were not allowed in the German military. But it was common in the jewish communist government of Russia.
The stories of brutality are told by the jews, and much of those stories are either fabrications or actually attributable to the communist jews operating in Poland.
Do you want to see some brutality?
Post WW1, the German/Polish border was redrawn. Many German people who had been "living in Germany" were now suddenly living on their same farm, but they were now "living in Poland" -- under the Polish government, which had been taken over by communist jews (from Russia).
Their land didn't change. The political borders did.
And the Germans living there were subjected to massive rape, torture, brutality and murder/genocide by the communist jews in control of Poland.
Hitler pleaded with other European leaders to help put a stop to this brutality, but nobody would listen.
That's because the English wanted war with Germany. Germany had suddenly become the strongest economy in Europe -- in just 5 years under Hitler's leadership -- and the English leadership felt it was a threat to their economic strength. THIS is the real reason for WW2, or at least one of them.
Finally, Hitler sent his army into Poland to put a stop to the bloodshed, and England/France immediately used that as an excuse to declare war on Germany.
THIS is REAL brutality -- take a look:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GvJVRJdPi9K8
Those were German VICTIMS, not perpetrators.
Again, the stories of brutality are told by the jews, not the Germans (who have been mistreated and silenced since the war).
Yes, that is "another story," and I will just finish here by saying that jews are NOT semites. They are a mixed race, only partly semitic, and therefore not true semites.
Therefore, the claim of "anti-semitic" is a lie, promoted by the jews (of course, as it has benefited them greatly at everyone else's expense).
It IS truly tragic that your father and his fellow kin had to suffer, along with the other Europeans of the time, and the Americans who thought they were helping, but as Gen. George Patton said, once he realized the whole thing was a scam:
Thanks for the lengthy response.
If they were lucky. More likely, they would simply be shot. A partisan (combatant) not in uniformed clothing is not protected under the Geneva convention, neither are they "subject to prisoner of war treatment".
So this is the moral justification for starving another country's entire population?
All the other points worth discussing, I'll omit. I can see that you believe what you believe, and I'm not going to try to argue you off it (what would be the point, right?)
I do not buy into the idea that Britain (or British rulers) was blameless or innocent in all this, but neither do I accept the nation that Hitler and the Nazi regime were innocent, were victims, and otherwise wonderful people forced to do bad things because other, more evil people, forced them into it.
As for the examples you cite, Patton (one general), victims, incidents, and more, I think this simply illustrates how any person can take a particular data set and then reach conclusions or make interpretations based on the chosen overriding framework or perspective. By which I mean, one case: M looks at A, C, E, G, and concludes "this means X", when N looks at B, D, F, H and concludes "this means Y". And O looks at ABCDE and concludes "this means Z".
What each person (chooses) to look at, and what conclusions they draw from them, obviously says something about the person and their chosen framework (worldview) as much as it does about the actual available data.
I do not find your argument (aka as laid out here) convincing or persuasive. There is already a plethora of counter-arguments in my mind, but I'm not keen to discuss further a very complex subject with extremely broad ramifications and nuances, as to what we see in the world.
We've both stated our perspective, and position, and made an exchange based on that. As it is, I'd call that a win.
I will mention, however, I think your constant reference to and emphasis on "(communist) jews" (10 times) is a strong indicator. Of what? Well, you decide for yourself.
Although I am not persuaded, I appreciate the effort you made to lay out your perspective. Cheers
Except he was right. Learn your history about what the jews did to germany at the time. Hitler was Time Magazine Man of the Year.
Wait until you find out that Hitler was just one if the first historical targets of fake news. He's the original Michael Jackson... framed for the crimes that they themselves were doing. Has the exposure of MSM and education system, taught you nothing yet? Wait until you figure out that everything they've ever taught you is a lie.
The irony of that is lost on today's Democratic Socialist suckas. This meme is in circulation on the web now, right?
It’s making its rounds.
I pranked my granddaughter. Told her I knew a guy she’d find irresistible. Described him as an artist, a vegan, an animal rights advocate. She wanted to meet him. Then I told her his name….
Nice
Reminds me of a funny comment I saw on another forum awhile back.
Apparently, AOC was bitching about Tesla cars and Elon Musk. She said something like she will stick with her VW.
Someone replied: Wait 'til she finds out who created Volkswagen.
LOL.
Hitler was also an environmentalist before it was fashionable. He heavily promoted windmills to generate electricity. He even promoted biodiesel. It didn’t work, like so many of his plans, but he pioneered government subsidies for alternative energy.
When he had the autobahn built, he expressly ordered that it be built in such a way as to minimize any destruction to the land and scenery.
He wanted to preserve the beauty of Germany.
Nobody’s all bad. Still not a fan.
You'd have to be either intellectually dishonest or completely brainwashed to think Hitler just "blamed the Jews for everything". Like the Germans all collectively started hating the Jews for no reason in particular lmao. Go look up the transsexual clinic and all the degeneracy that was being pushed under the Weimar republic and who was behind it.
Right. Hitler wrote all about how the jews were destroying Germany and Russia in his book, "Mein Kampf," and he told everyone who would listen that he would put a stop to it.
Here are 2 rabbis who claim they had "no idea" why "Hitler hated jews."
Then they discovered it was because jews created communism.
And although they don't say it, communism has been the one ideology more responsible for mass murder in the history of the world than any other ideology.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLqXs9hXsA4
My thoughts go back to Berlin showing clearly what a certain population was doing. It is exactly the same as the same people have been shoving down our "throats" through our eyes and ears now. He built the German nation back to the 2nd most productive people in the world. He did recognize what was happening about a 1000km away and knew it would be expanding once it was done subduing the largely Christian monarchy that existed before the Bolshevics for almost a millenia. The same monarchy that had dealt with a little group of thieves called the name changers... who made their livings and fortunes preying on traders going either directing through their lands... Khazaria. Read all about it in World History if you can dig deep enough to find the truth.
Hitler went mad.... drunk on power? maybe... drug addled from the cocktail of chems he took... lack of animal protein? that would drive me fn insane. But he was a decorated soldier of the so called Great War and bitter over the punishments handed out to the people of Germania.. add to that the evidence that suggests he might be a bastard of the Rothschilds. It is all pretty interesting when you dig and think for yourself instead of relying on opinions from Jews and the jew schooled we see all about us. As the vast majority of scholastic texts is controlled by that same group. As are most of the large school boards that decide on curriculum using a commercial entities offerings. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ is and always has been the root of evil since it was invented God knows when.
Guess which of the Abrahamic faiths ( 1 or 2 might not even be a faith as much as cults) those same Khazars chose when they were forced to choose or die.
I haven't looked into it much, but I suspect the reason the jews wanted to destroy Russia in the early 20th century has to do with how the Russians pushed the jews out of Russia back in the days of Khazaria.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, known for his book, "Gulag Archipelago" where he detailed the horrors of the Soviet gulags, also wrote the book, "200 Years Together" where he went into detail about the death and destruction the jews wreaked on the Russian people for at least 200 years prior to the 20th Century.
Let's not forget that Ghislaine Maxwell's father, Robert Maxwell," was a jew, a Mossad operative, and also publisher of history text books for nearly ALL American grade school students.
The false propaganda runs deep.
Not easy to overcome for most people.
See my thread on "The Law of Primacy," which explains why most people have difficulty breaking out of their early brainwashed programming:
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASsnCA09t/
Several folks on GAW will tell you that Hitler was the good guy. Came across a couple in the last few hours. Those vets we celebrate see this. We are the news.
You'll notice they insist established definitions "have more than one meaning". That is sad. It reeks of participation trophy. Its loser talk.
America first. Losers of wars last.