Think Tesla was a persecuted genius who just wanted to give the world free energy? Matt Ehret would like a word. In Part 1 of this deep dive, he traces Tesla's closest friendship to George Sylvester Virek, Hitler's official Washington spokesman, Aleister Crowley disciple, and organizer of the 1939 Madison Square Garden Nazi rally. Along the way Ehret documents Tesla's enthusiastic support for mandatory eugenics, his belief that humans are soulless automatons with no free will, his claim to have received radio signals from Martians, and his tele-automaton demos that turned out to be a guy behind a curtain with a remote control. The Wardenclyffe Tower? Blown up by US Naval Intelligence for transmitting secrets to Germany. The beloved persecuted visionary story starts looking considerably less heroic from here.
Some eye-opening stuff, to be sure. And, well, researched.
Not casting any shade on John Trump by any means, but it certainly seems that Tesla is not everything he's been made out to be.
Guilt by association, plus the tower was powered down in 1906 and was not capable of transmitting anything. It was shut down as J.P. Morgan found out the power could not be metered, so no profits.
I am glad to see you admit it worked.
No, not at all. What posted here is simply the blurb for the issues the research raises. You know, actual research, investigation, with an unbiased mind.
It was shut down as J.P. Morgan found out the power could not be metered
OK. This is the story we are told. But is it true?
The questions are valid.
I am glad to see you admit it worked.
Well, the snarkiness at least tells me you are triggered. Take that trigger, and invest the energy into research. It's worth doing. Beliefs that cannot be defended are inherently weak.
tbh, prior to listening to this 2-part well researched (aka based on factual information, not narrative) I very much had the exact same impression of Tesla that I'm sure you share. Moreover, I had a personal connection to the Tesla legend, in that a friend/associate of mine is the person who developed and established the Tesla memorial at the New Yorker Hotel, when Tesla lived at the time of his death.
However, listening to this author's research, then cross referencing it with my own checks, leads me to believe that maybe we haven't been told the whole story, or even the real story. I'm still thinking about it, and I don't have any hard and fast conclusions.
But really, if you are willing to convict by association, that's just the inverse of being willing to exonerate by association. Or because of the story you've learned. One we've all been told.
On the other hand, if you're unwilling or unable to question that narrative, with an open mind, and learn some of the factual information, at least, to be able to base your viewpoint on facts, then yeah! Avoid the podcast!
I mean, heck. We've been lied to about everything of the last 120 years, except of course, Tesla, right!!!??
Hey, its your choice. I'm just providing to the board something I found, and sharing my experience and opinion on the research (so far). If you reject the content out of hand simply because it contradicts a firmly held set of beliefs, hey, that's your choice.
You can't always be right can you?
Um, are you trying to make this some sort of argument where one side wins (always right) and the other loses? Because frankly, I'm not interested in that. Am I interested in challenging my understand of various things? Certainly. Including Tesla.
More importantly, I don't have a firm opinion on whether the researchers conclusions are right, or accurate, or on target. Yet. But I'm not going to reject the factual information simply because it contradicts what I think I know.
Well, one of the weird things is his relationship with George Sylvester Virek. It's well documented. And, Tesla refers to him as his best friend. Who and what George Sylvester Virek also appears to be well documented. (just do a web search on this guy, or ask grok about his relationship with Tesla to get some factoids.)
I don't know that Tesla had 'genocidal intentions', but his statements on Eugenics are pretty clearly recorded, in his words and articles.
This apparently, is one of the more widely quoted statements (published in Liberty magazine (February 1935)):
“The year 2100 will see eugenics universally established. In past ages, the law governing the survival of the fittest roughly weeded out the less desirable strains. Then man’s new sense of pity began to interfere with the ruthless workings of nature. As a result, we continue to keep alive and to breed the unfit.
The only method compatible with our notions of civilization and the race is to prevent the breeding of the unfit by sterilization and the deliberate guidance of the mating instinct. Several European countries and a number of states of the American Union sterilize the criminal and the insane. This is not sufficient. The trend of opinion among eugenists is that we must make marriage more difficult. Certainly no one who is not a desirable parent should be permitted to produce progeny. A century from now it will no more occur to a normal person to mate with a person eugenically unfit than to marry a habitual criminal.”
So, I mean, I never knew this aspect of Tesla. It makes you ponder. It does appear, however, that his view was not quite as racially motivated as the Nazis, who advanced the idea of a superior race. Tesla seems to have simply been more, hey, unfit, mentally ill, criminal inclined... we should get rid of them and not allow anyone connected to them to breed....
The question is, has Tesla been made out to be some sort of humanistic savior of humanity, the inventor who wanted to make energy free to all humanity? Or was he a more complex, and also flawed person.... Hmmm...?
Didn't Nick T have a "Nazi spy" pretending to be an assistant? Almost like some of our "Vice Presidents" turning out to be Deep Staters making sure the President is "monitored" and doesn't get off course (Johnson, Ford, Bush, Pence).
I haven't watched the content yet. But the snip you posted has me calling BS. I say that because this is how we should have known him for all this time if all the information detailed in your snip is true. I am inclined to ask, "why is this NOW coming out?"
This isn't the story any of us grew up with. Had this information been part of the original narrative when we first heard of him, we'd have had a differing opinion of his legacy.
I say that because this is how we should have known him
Are you asserting that everything we've been taught over the past 100+ years is 'the truth' and that there is actually no waking up that needs to be done? That "if X were true, we'd know it!"
Because that is the response of every single person who claimed that 'if all those baseless conspiracy theories were true, we'd know it.'
Are you convinced that COVID was a verifiable pandemic, that people should have been wearing masks, that all the lockdowns were unfortunate but necessary measures, etc? And that the covid virus thing actually came from bats in a wet market?
Because until the truth emerges, that's what people believe.
Had this information been part of the original narrative when we first heard of him, we'd have had a differing opinion of his legacy.
Well, obviously. But the argument that "if this was true, I'd know it" is a completely false logic.
What do you understand about the world that you did not understand 10 years ago? Anything? or nothing?
I think its fine to be skeptical, and calling something out as BS is a natural response to information that contradicts something we think we know, but I strongly encourage you to watch or listen to the content before passing judgment. But only if its something that interests you, or you are willing to question what you know.
For me, all this was new information, but listening to the content, well, this certainly got me thinking.
I am inclined to ask, "why is this NOW coming out?"
"Are you asserting that everything we've been taught over the past 100+ years is 'the truth' and that there is actually no waking up that needs to be done? That "if X were true, we'd know it!"
I'm asserting there is a body of information that has endured for decades and not a single iota of the informatuon brought forward has ever been heard of until this moment. Sus
This is why the timing is suspicious.
This isn't information waiting to be discovered that was available at ANY time in the past. Sources? Emprical evidence? Just my thoughts on it.
I'm not invested enough to dig any deeper. But I'm not compelled to change my mind either.
I for one would like to know if this is conjecture or true. Would explain a lot. But im not sure what secrets he was sending to germany back when thos happened.
I don't know either if he was sending info. I think the facts are, tho, that this was the reason given for shutting it down.
George Sylvester Virek - his "best friend" - was almost certainly a Nazi agent. Lots of information on that. Heaps.
Also, that Aleister Crowley was a full-blown occultist, and a double agent working for both the British intel and the Germans.
The thing is, there seems to be lots of connections that when you join the dots, draw a very different picture of Tesla than the one we've been sold.
I haven't made up my mind yet, but I'm willing to think about it.
The researcher (podcaster) has a podcast focused on breaking free of psyops. That's going to challenge some ideas people think they know.
what secrets he was sending to germany
From what I can gather, Crowley was working for the British in order to draw and force Germany (Prussia) into the first world war. i.e. that Germany had no desire to got to war, but the British Cabal created the situation forcing them in.
For example, the sinking of the RMS Lusitania. According to the researcher, although ostensibly a passenger vessel, it was actually carrying munitions from the USA to the UK. This information was leaked to German intel on purpose to have them attack the ship, thus creating a propaganda victory for the Brits. "Evil Germany sinks civilian population without cause or provocation."
Don't know if this is all true, but the researcher presents an interesting case.
The underlying premise of the podcast (there are two parts, I and II) is that Tesla has been made out to be a sort of 'god-like' figure by the forces that are pursuing a technological utopia, aka the occultist transhumanists, etc.
Curious stuff.
What I do find interesting but not surprising at all is how some people just dismiss any suggestion that Tesla might not be exactly who they think he is, out of hand. The idea of sacred cow comes to mind.
I plan to listen to the series again, and then perhaps report back in a post.
If you're keen on some eye-opening research, try this:
Breaking Free of Psyops Ep. 11: The Dark Truth of Nikola Tesla - Part 1 (rumble link)
Synopsis
Some eye-opening stuff, to be sure. And, well, researched.
Not casting any shade on John Trump by any means, but it certainly seems that Tesla is not everything he's been made out to be.
Guilt by association, plus the tower was powered down in 1906 and was not capable of transmitting anything. It was shut down as J.P. Morgan found out the power could not be metered, so no profits. I am glad to see you admit it worked.
No, not at all. What posted here is simply the blurb for the issues the research raises. You know, actual research, investigation, with an unbiased mind.
OK. This is the story we are told. But is it true?
The questions are valid.
Well, the snarkiness at least tells me you are triggered. Take that trigger, and invest the energy into research. It's worth doing. Beliefs that cannot be defended are inherently weak.
tbh, prior to listening to this 2-part well researched (aka based on factual information, not narrative) I very much had the exact same impression of Tesla that I'm sure you share. Moreover, I had a personal connection to the Tesla legend, in that a friend/associate of mine is the person who developed and established the Tesla memorial at the New Yorker Hotel, when Tesla lived at the time of his death.
However, listening to this author's research, then cross referencing it with my own checks, leads me to believe that maybe we haven't been told the whole story, or even the real story. I'm still thinking about it, and I don't have any hard and fast conclusions.
But really, if you are willing to convict by association, that's just the inverse of being willing to exonerate by association. Or because of the story you've learned. One we've all been told.
On the other hand, if you're unwilling or unable to question that narrative, with an open mind, and learn some of the factual information, at least, to be able to base your viewpoint on facts, then yeah! Avoid the podcast!
I mean, heck. We've been lied to about everything of the last 120 years, except of course, Tesla, right!!!??
I’ve had times here where I got triggered at something, set off to prove it wrong, and ended up smashing my own biases.
Whoops.
Other times where I found things that lined up with my suspicions but that I’d had no idea about and was stunned at.
It can’t be stressed enough that research is key.
I mean, a willingness to try and be objective or to question what I know, that kinda helps too.
You can't always be right can you? Never mind my presumed snarkiness, It works and you can't deny that.
Uh, ok. You know this, how, exactly?
Hey, its your choice. I'm just providing to the board something I found, and sharing my experience and opinion on the research (so far). If you reject the content out of hand simply because it contradicts a firmly held set of beliefs, hey, that's your choice.
Um, are you trying to make this some sort of argument where one side wins (always right) and the other loses? Because frankly, I'm not interested in that. Am I interested in challenging my understand of various things? Certainly. Including Tesla.
More importantly, I don't have a firm opinion on whether the researchers conclusions are right, or accurate, or on target. Yet. But I'm not going to reject the factual information simply because it contradicts what I think I know.
You would think that if Tesla had been involved with genocidal intentions, the Nazis would have embraced Tesla and held under the Nazi wings. J.S.
Well, one of the weird things is his relationship with George Sylvester Virek. It's well documented. And, Tesla refers to him as his best friend. Who and what George Sylvester Virek also appears to be well documented. (just do a web search on this guy, or ask grok about his relationship with Tesla to get some factoids.)
I don't know that Tesla had 'genocidal intentions', but his statements on Eugenics are pretty clearly recorded, in his words and articles.
This apparently, is one of the more widely quoted statements (published in Liberty magazine (February 1935)):
So, I mean, I never knew this aspect of Tesla. It makes you ponder. It does appear, however, that his view was not quite as racially motivated as the Nazis, who advanced the idea of a superior race. Tesla seems to have simply been more, hey, unfit, mentally ill, criminal inclined... we should get rid of them and not allow anyone connected to them to breed....
The question is, has Tesla been made out to be some sort of humanistic savior of humanity, the inventor who wanted to make energy free to all humanity? Or was he a more complex, and also flawed person.... Hmmm...?
Didn't Nick T have a "Nazi spy" pretending to be an assistant? Almost like some of our "Vice Presidents" turning out to be Deep Staters making sure the President is "monitored" and doesn't get off course (Johnson, Ford, Bush, Pence).
I haven't watched the content yet. But the snip you posted has me calling BS. I say that because this is how we should have known him for all this time if all the information detailed in your snip is true. I am inclined to ask, "why is this NOW coming out?"
This isn't the story any of us grew up with. Had this information been part of the original narrative when we first heard of him, we'd have had a differing opinion of his legacy.
Are you asserting that everything we've been taught over the past 100+ years is 'the truth' and that there is actually no waking up that needs to be done? That "if X were true, we'd know it!"
Because that is the response of every single person who claimed that 'if all those baseless conspiracy theories were true, we'd know it.'
Are you convinced that COVID was a verifiable pandemic, that people should have been wearing masks, that all the lockdowns were unfortunate but necessary measures, etc? And that the covid virus thing actually came from bats in a wet market?
Because until the truth emerges, that's what people believe.
Well, obviously. But the argument that "if this was true, I'd know it" is a completely false logic.
What do you understand about the world that you did not understand 10 years ago? Anything? or nothing?
I think its fine to be skeptical, and calling something out as BS is a natural response to information that contradicts something we think we know, but I strongly encourage you to watch or listen to the content before passing judgment. But only if its something that interests you, or you are willing to question what you know.
For me, all this was new information, but listening to the content, well, this certainly got me thinking.
Um, because some one bothered to look?
"Are you asserting that everything we've been taught over the past 100+ years is 'the truth' and that there is actually no waking up that needs to be done? That "if X were true, we'd know it!"
I'm asserting there is a body of information that has endured for decades and not a single iota of the informatuon brought forward has ever been heard of until this moment. Sus
This is why the timing is suspicious.
This isn't information waiting to be discovered that was available at ANY time in the past. Sources? Emprical evidence? Just my thoughts on it.
I'm not invested enough to dig any deeper. But I'm not compelled to change my mind either.
I for one would like to know if this is conjecture or true. Would explain a lot. But im not sure what secrets he was sending to germany back when thos happened.
I don't know either if he was sending info. I think the facts are, tho, that this was the reason given for shutting it down.
George Sylvester Virek - his "best friend" - was almost certainly a Nazi agent. Lots of information on that. Heaps.
Also, that Aleister Crowley was a full-blown occultist, and a double agent working for both the British intel and the Germans.
The thing is, there seems to be lots of connections that when you join the dots, draw a very different picture of Tesla than the one we've been sold.
I haven't made up my mind yet, but I'm willing to think about it.
The researcher (podcaster) has a podcast focused on breaking free of psyops. That's going to challenge some ideas people think they know.
From what I can gather, Crowley was working for the British in order to draw and force Germany (Prussia) into the first world war. i.e. that Germany had no desire to got to war, but the British Cabal created the situation forcing them in.
For example, the sinking of the RMS Lusitania. According to the researcher, although ostensibly a passenger vessel, it was actually carrying munitions from the USA to the UK. This information was leaked to German intel on purpose to have them attack the ship, thus creating a propaganda victory for the Brits. "Evil Germany sinks civilian population without cause or provocation."
Don't know if this is all true, but the researcher presents an interesting case.
The underlying premise of the podcast (there are two parts, I and II) is that Tesla has been made out to be a sort of 'god-like' figure by the forces that are pursuing a technological utopia, aka the occultist transhumanists, etc.
Curious stuff.
What I do find interesting but not surprising at all is how some people just dismiss any suggestion that Tesla might not be exactly who they think he is, out of hand. The idea of sacred cow comes to mind.
I plan to listen to the series again, and then perhaps report back in a post.
💯
u/#correct
This will upset many in the Tesla religion...
This is the Great Awakening... nobody ever said it wouldn't challenge your beliefs.
We must leave no stone unturned, challenge EVERYTHING we've been told/sold, adjust our understanding accordingly, adapt and overcome.
Otherwise you stay lost in the past & in your own bubble of outdated, superstitious belief.
Onward!
u/#catdance