The amount of people here especially mods who buy that narrative hook line and sinker is honestly pathetic and they are acting like Democrats when it comes to questioning this cause it’s “their side”.
None of them have actually addressed the oddities of the case in good faith it’s “yOUr A caNDiE”, “mUh jOOs” and gaslighting. It’s because they don’t have an actual argument. They single out Candace because that is emotionally and intellectually easier than addressing the other people on Twitter, Instagram and tik tok who have broken down this assassination. I called it an Israeli hit job from day 1 before Candace said a single thing.
I have been banned for disagreeing about Erika Kirk lmfao. It’s literally just right wing leftist behavior.
I am shocked at how many people are buying the fed slop. X is full of bot accounts, trying to dismiss anybody who asks questions. I thought that’s what this place was all about. Asking questions. 🫠
You can believe whatever you want, thats your prerogative, I will believe based on the evidence presented.
I believe a kid wont walk around the way he did, scoping out the location 250 miles away from his home, and set up his rifle on the roof unless he had a good reason. So, I believe he was definitely involved in the assassination.
What I would love to see once we have this conviction, is the co-conspirators of the kid. That will only come after his conviction is secured. Thats why this is an important case, and also why Candy and co so desperately spread so many lies about him.
"The evidence against Robinson is just really, really compelling," Vance told @MaryMargOlohan
"Do I think Tyler Robinson pulled the trigger and killed Charlie Kirk? Absolutely."
"Do I wonder if there are other people who are more directly involved in Charlie’s murder? Absolutely, because I don’t think that it’s possible for a young man to get radicalized like that without somebody encouraging him, whether informally or formally.”
IMO, there was a second shooter. This was a setup, and manipulation. There's no load for a 30-06 at 150 yds that wouldn't have severed the neck. Ballistics is a proven science. That is all.
Makes two of us. Roll my own and enjoy the round hitting where it was aimed...WOWZA!!!!!
Guy has a range that is 1000 yrds and it is a "doozy". Off to the side of the main range is where people can zero their rifles and also test rounds out to 500 yrds.
The one thing nobody talks about is the fact that we've been allowed to see Charlie Kirk get murdered in living color. When does the MSM ever allow its audience to witness graphic video of someone being shot and killed? None of images were blurred or blacked-out? Why not? Once you know the answer to this question, a lot of the puzzle pieces will fall into place.
Interesting - immediately after the assassination, many posts from various individuals explained how it could not possibly have been this guy, the gun wasn't what they said, he wasn't in the right spot, etc., etc. Many details didn't align with the official narrative. Now the official narrative looks like the only one that fits the available evidence. WTF
I feel like Tyler Robinson is the new vaccine. Take it and believe in it, the story, or else!
The amount of people here especially mods who buy that narrative hook line and sinker is honestly pathetic and they are acting like Democrats when it comes to questioning this cause it’s “their side”.
None of them have actually addressed the oddities of the case in good faith it’s “yOUr A caNDiE”, “mUh jOOs” and gaslighting. It’s because they don’t have an actual argument. They single out Candace because that is emotionally and intellectually easier than addressing the other people on Twitter, Instagram and tik tok who have broken down this assassination. I called it an Israeli hit job from day 1 before Candace said a single thing.
I have been banned for disagreeing about Erika Kirk lmfao. It’s literally just right wing leftist behavior.
I am shocked at how many people are buying the fed slop. X is full of bot accounts, trying to dismiss anybody who asks questions. I thought that’s what this place was all about. Asking questions. 🫠
No "Muh Israel did everything" is the new vaccine. Luckily very few people are falling for that
'Israel did everything' started with 9/11
I thought they believe JFK assassination was also Israel
You can still believe that somebody else did this, without thinking it’s Israel. That kid did not kill Charley.
You can believe whatever you want, thats your prerogative, I will believe based on the evidence presented.
I believe a kid wont walk around the way he did, scoping out the location 250 miles away from his home, and set up his rifle on the roof unless he had a good reason. So, I believe he was definitely involved in the assassination.
What I would love to see once we have this conviction, is the co-conspirators of the kid. That will only come after his conviction is secured. Thats why this is an important case, and also why Candy and co so desperately spread so many lies about him.
"The evidence against Robinson is just really, really compelling," Vance told @MaryMargOlohan
"Do I think Tyler Robinson pulled the trigger and killed Charlie Kirk? Absolutely."
"Do I wonder if there are other people who are more directly involved in Charlie’s murder? Absolutely, because I don’t think that it’s possible for a young man to get radicalized like that without somebody encouraging him, whether informally or formally.”
https://nitter.net/i/status/2076022630898163800
IMO, there was a second shooter. This was a setup, and manipulation. There's no load for a 30-06 at 150 yds that wouldn't have severed the neck. Ballistics is a proven science. That is all.
Every person and their mother is a ballistic expert lol
Just years of experience. That's all .
Makes two of us. Roll my own and enjoy the round hitting where it was aimed...WOWZA!!!!!
Guy has a range that is 1000 yrds and it is a "doozy". Off to the side of the main range is where people can zero their rifles and also test rounds out to 500 yrds.
AHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
A very satisfying day.
All the evidence has not been presented yet. That will be at the trial, so more will be coming out.
The evidence seen so far is dasting.
The one thing nobody talks about is the fact that we've been allowed to see Charlie Kirk get murdered in living color. When does the MSM ever allow its audience to witness graphic video of someone being shot and killed? None of images were blurred or blacked-out? Why not? Once you know the answer to this question, a lot of the puzzle pieces will fall into place.
Interesting - immediately after the assassination, many posts from various individuals explained how it could not possibly have been this guy, the gun wasn't what they said, he wasn't in the right spot, etc., etc. Many details didn't align with the official narrative. Now the official narrative looks like the only one that fits the available evidence. WTF
Question is, if they are lying, why?
if this holds true. then VP Vance might be “being at presidential level) here for 2028