TPUSA
(twitter.com)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Leah certainly loves to hate Donald Trump. Personally, that's a red flag for me.
From her substack:
https://substack.com/@theleahfiles/note/c-293866174?r=tydym&utm_source=notes-share-action&utm_medium=web
I'd be curious to see what the thrust of this "20 years in intelligence | Corporate intelligence CEO"'s narratives are, overall.
It's like the shills don't think we've seen this sort of setup before with the Trump haters. It's been ten years.
kek
Leah doesn’t make any sense, the senate don’t want to confirm Blanche probably because he got the senate and Demoncrats and RINOS and all the creeps dirty laundry and criminal activities they have been doing in this country specially if it is about money stole from our taxpayer’s money.
Agreed.
Everything on her timeline was 'right-hate.' Plus one of her reposts was traitor Joe Kent.
https://x.com/joekent16jan19/status/2076665388692033915
Yeah, I briefly took a look through her substack after my initial look, and saw that by and large, she's producing content that is decidedly anti-Trump agenda.
I don't know if Kent is a traitor or not, but this woman certainly presents the impression of being an Attack Trump Agenda asset.
This doesn't mean that all or some of her information here is wrong, but I think it calls into question her motives and therefor, product.
And also people who are financially savvy and business savvy do that.
I guess Candies ran out of juice after Tyler Robinson case exposed all their fakery.
You must not be following the Tyler Robinson case.
Much like chemtrails and DEWs, certain mods are staying willfully ignorant on this.
I’m surprised you weren’t banned just now for even mentioning this…
If only you enlightened users would share your secret knowledge so the rest of us could see what we have overlooked.
So - for the fifth or sixth time I'll ask - please tell us what we are missing. Must be a hugely significant datapoint if it has convinced you and others to go against Trump on supporting TPUSA.
As you know, this board is full of truth seekers who don't let their egos get in the way. We are all ears. Drop the condescension and present some facts.
You don't get to just say that and then not tell us what you think Bubbles is overlooking. Frogs don't play that candy cult BS.
I have paid close attention to the trial. To me the evidence against Robinson is overwhelming. So please tell us, what are we missing?
https://x.com/QuothByRaven/status/2075808285727359092?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2075808285727359092%7Ctwgr%5E46edc00009e7a35d46fb498420f7c222b9071e79%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreatawakening.win%2Fp%2F1ATBqcyLuI%2Ftyler-robinson-case-a-good-summa%2Fc%2F
My brother in Christ that post is a joke and I cannot believe someone who frequents this board would present it as evidence of anything.
Tell me, have you personally verified all those sourceless claims? Start going down the list. Shouldn't take you long to realize the whole thing is BS.
Yep! If true, probably legal.
Audit Erika Kirk. She always seemed to me phony after Charlie Kirk’s death. Fake grief, fake widow, etc.
In the two years I have been lurking on GAW she is the most controversial figure debated over between frogs. With interpretation of Charlie Kirk's "removal" the most controversial single event. It's almost as if the mods should take a non-anonymous Erika good/Erika bad poll and stuff the list on a shelf until the truth clarifies. Just to see who has superior skills of discernment.
I've admired the character /business person, Donald Trump, for decades through his media interviews and TV appearances on different platforms. I can honestly say he had a small, but (to me) visceral negative reaction to Erika hugging /leaning on him at the Charlie Kirk memorial. He distracted her by pointing up to the audience to get her off his chest. As a fellow human being, I can sympathize with losing a loved one, but Erika has a past that is full of red flags. Instinct tells me that evidence and conspiracy can be created, developed and disseminated with success.
Agreed. Just the way he looked at her. He knows. It is a sting. A deep one.
Way interesting post, NellS.
These strategies must be in use all over the place.
Maybe I'm not too big business/charity savvy, however the only reason it looks bad is because the person writing it thinks it is bad. It's like only hearing one line of a quote, and being asked an opinion. I saw one recently where it was like "'take their guns, ask questions later' and the interviewer said it was a PDJT quote. Guess what? it was taken out of context. It was in regard to red flag laws. So yeah, gonna wait and, if I feel like looking further into it, find out more.
Which is why zero political organizations het any money from.me.