2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

According to court dockets, this guy has accused all 3 of his ex wives of fraud. He’s also sued others accusing them of fraud only to drop the case for lack of prosecution. One doesn’t need to be an “expert” to see what is going on here. Best case scenario is that this guy is the boy who cried wolf, and this time he is for real. I am not prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt. Not when what he’s claiming lacks the necessary evidentiary record behind it. With everything we’ve seen so far, the best you can get is a “maybe there is something here” but when this appears to be regular conduct by the guy, it doesn’t seem like any kind of stretch to conclude it’s probably at least vexatious litigation and might be the paranoid delusions of a mental illness.

Your substantive response was also a cool story, bro.

6
AllowMeToExplain 6 points ago +6 / -0

It would be beyond fucked up to subject us to this admin when it would be possible to simply end it and jail all these corrupt asshats. I am not ok with such a scheme. Such an approach kinda reminds me of GW Bush and his “hearts and minds” campaign in Iraq. That didn’t work. But how many US troops were killed/wounded from the program because they didn’t go ruthless until victory was seized?

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

No doubt family court is beyond fucked up. However, its more than one ex wife he’s done this with. As well as accusing a doctor of fraud with no contract - something that I wish I could get the pleadings on because I suspect it should have been malpractice but something made him plead fraud.

This guy has a habit of naming all of these John/Jane Doe people in his complaints. Like in the home inspector lawsuit, he has 25 people as John/Jane Doe. How the hell is that possible? That is a non sequitur.

No doubt courts generally are corrupt. But at this point, to believe what this guy is saying as truthful, you have to first accept he might be the unluckiest person alive to marry 3 people who have connections to faking documents and court orders. I’m not willing to buy that.

Another thing that makes no sense is that he says some lawsuit was filed related to the “fraudulent” CA judgment being enforced in AZ so as to prevent him from selling his house and buying another. He lists that he was to pay $38,400 as down payment and his now ex wife was to come up with something like $24,000. But somehow, a lawyer can’t come up with 38k outside of the equity in his house…Not gonna buy that when the average attorney salary with 10+ years experience is close to 300k. A successful attorney with that experience probably makes 2-3x as much. At the very least, its the kind of income that should have no problems getting you a line of credit to pull that out…or a bridge loan on the home equity.

If there is a lien on your house, you can collateralize it and remove the lien. It is then up to the lien holder to foreclose on the collateral you posted. Typically it is 115% of the lien amount. If they don’t foreclose, you get it back at the end of the statutory period.

I can see the dockets for 2 HOA related suits on a third party site, but they don’t exist on the official AZ site. That is rather odd. But I might not have the right format for the case numbers to work. However, using John Thaler as a name gives you a parking ticket case and unlawful flight from law enforcement. That is it. No HOA cases come up.

3
AllowMeToExplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't know how to point you to what I just posted in this thread, but read that and tell me you still think Beanz is premature. It's ok if you still do. Just curious if what I found changes your mind.

3
AllowMeToExplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have been very skeptical ever since this came out because something just didn't seem right. Can't put my finger on it, it just doesn't seem organic to me.

This looks like standard operating procedure for this guy. I cannot find the filings in this case because it is so old. But have a look at this:

Case Number: LC081939 JOHN HARRIS THALER VS MELINDA ANN THALER

Filing Courthouse: Van Nuys Courthouse East Filing Date: 07/03/2008 Case Type: Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) Status: Dismissed-Lack of Prosecution 11/19/2008

In this case, he also included Does 1 to 10...presumably randos he could not or would not identify. Presumably Melinda Ann Thaler is an ex wife.

Case Number: LC070214 JOHN THALER, ET AL VS STUART GLAZER, ET AL

Filing Courthouse: Van Nuys Courthouse East Filing Date: 01/03/2005 Case Type: Breach Contract/Warnty-Negligence (General Jurisdiction) Status: Dismissed-Other 09/28/2005

In this case, he also sued Does 1-25. This looks like a home inspector lawsuit.

Case Number: LC086948 JOHN HARRIS THALER VS JOSEPH KENAN M.D ET AL

Filing Courthouse: Van Nuys Courthouse East Filing Date: 09/18/2009 Case Type: Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) Status: Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 03/19/2010

Contractual Fraud?? Was this some kind of medical malpractice? Also contains Does 1-10...beginning to see a pattern here...

Case Number: BC519329 JOHN H THALER VS DYAN REILLY ET AL

Filing Courthouse: Stanley Mosk Courthouse Filing Date: 08/23/2013 Case Type: Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) Status: Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 02/25/2014

This has Does 1-50... and it also looks like he is suing a Jewish Temple/Synagogue... wtf is up with this dude??

Case Number: LC104303 JOHN THALER VS. TARZANA FALLS HOA, ET AL

Filing Courthouse: Van Nuys Courthouse East Filing Date: 06/13/2016 Case Type: Other Writ /Judicial Review (General Jurisdiction) Status: Judgment on the Pleading 09/18/2020

Also Does 1-50 in this case...its a cluster fuck of omfg entries that I can't parse through remotely efficiently.

Case Number: 21VECV00280 JOHN H THALER VS BRITTANY RAE CHAVEZ

Filing Courthouse: Van Nuys Courthouse East Filing Date: 03/03/2021 Case Type: Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction) Status: Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 12/02/2021

More fraud lawsuits. It does say dismissed for lack of in personam jurisdiction. But state court can't transfer you to another state court. Doesn't work that way. It appears he also simultaneously filed John H. Thaler v. Brittany Rae Thaler et al, Docket No. 2:21-cv-02892 (C.D. Cal. Apr 02, 2021) in federal court a month after filing in California state court. Something sure as hell ain't right about that. The only difference I can see without being able to pull any filings is that a shitload more defendants including City of Phoenix/Mesa, county of Maricopa, and Town of Gilbert and 150 Does...

Thaler v. Chavez et al, Docket No. 2:22-cv-00749 (D. Ariz. May 03, 2022), Court Docket

Looks like the identical shit to the prior case...150 Does, Arizona cities/counties/towns etc. and this case is...fucking habeas corpus?? WTF?


I knew something was off. As someone with a sibling that suffers from the most extreme form of mental illness, I suspect that is what we have here. You should have heard the insane paranoid delusions my sibling had at their worst. And some of the claims were partially plausible. But they were all made up. Every last one of them. And given that this guy is an attorney, he knows better than to do a lot of shit like this. Most of these cases were dismissed for lack of prosecution...i.e. he sued, and likely got whatever he was seeking from the defendant and simply filed nothing more. The court then disposed of it.

Count me in as having got off the fence. I am now squarely in the "this guy is so unhinged and lacking in credibility, I cannot discern anything from his claims that might actually have a basis in reality." This is a LARP. And if it is a LARP, the dude needs his bar card revoked immediately. Plus he ought to be sanctioned for wasting everyone's time and subjecting people to vexatious litigation.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya that is pretty much the extent of it. Although not every state actually requires a log book. Which, to me, seems really odd. We didn't have to use a log book. It was merely "suggested." But if you are actually someone who holds themselves out to the public for this service and charge a fee for it, I would think it would be stupid not to have a log. After all, if you get called to attest to your signature as notary, how would you know you actually did this notarization?

1
AllowMeToExplain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something is definitely off. Wendy has been an oddball to me for some time now. The one thing we got working against this being accurate is that MSM is not “debooooonking” the claims. When that happens, odds of truth grow exponentially.

1
AllowMeToExplain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya. Pretty much easy mode. Makes you wonder why we even bother to use notaries. I got a certificate from the Secretary of State and the website selling stamps said I would need it. But there was no place to upload it, nor did I ever get asked for it.

I just looked up Texas & Michigan. You don’t even have to take a test like I did in those states. Fill out and submit app, filing fee, and notary bond. Then you order a stamp from wherever you want. Seems like a joke.

1
AllowMeToExplain 1 point ago +1 / -0

I used to be a notary until our contracts did away with requiring notarization. I think mine expired in 2018. When I took that exam I got a form that had the relevant info. Then I just googled “notary stamp” and found the cheapest/fastest option. I think it cost me $15 + shipping, and I had it in a few days. Made me wonder if there was any reason to take the notary test lol…not sure anyone would know the difference in my state.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

That dipshit ought to read state statutes on who is in the militia before opening his mouth. These statutes are not exclusive, either. This is a list of only those for sure subject to duty in the unorganized militias. Most certainly if it was necessary, the age group would be expanded to just about anyone who can carry a rifle.

The national guard is but one kind of “militia” and all the states call it “the organized militia.” The “unorganized militia” is basically everyone else.

http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(qxmbu3t3ihkvxtcypev2kru5))/mileg.aspx?page=getobject&objectName=mcl-32-509

32.509 State military establishment; composition; organized and unorganized militia.

Sec. 109.

The organized militia of this state taken collectively shall be known as the state military establishment and constitutes the armed forces of this state. The organized militia consists of the army national guard, the air national guard, and the defense force when actually in existence as provided in this act. The unorganized militia consists of all other able-bodied citizens of this state and all other able-bodied citizens who are residents of this state who have or shall have declared their intention to become citizens of the United States, who shall be age 17 or over and not more than age 60, and shall be subject to state military duty as provided in this act.

https://casetext.com/statute/california-codes/california-military-and-veterans-code/division-2-the-military-forces-of-the-state/part-1-the-state-militia/chapter-2-general-organization/article-1-composition/section-121-composition-of-unorganized-militia

Section 121 - Composition of unorganized militia

The unorganized militia consists of all persons liable to service in the militia, but not members of the National Guard, the State Guard, or the Naval Militia.

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/MIL/2

  1. The unorganized militia shall consist of all able-bodied male residents of the state between the ages of seventeen and forty-five who are not serving in any force of the organized militia or who are not on the state reserve list or the state retired list and who are or who have declared their intention to become citizens of the United States, subject, however, to such exemptions from military duty as are created by the laws of the United States.
3
AllowMeToExplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

More like wtf are you talking about? Did you create your own new definition of “coup” to not include the military ousting the US government? Is this a sacred cow third rail nobody can touch cuz it would hurt your feelers? Just because you might support the coup doesn’t make it not a coup. And we have been living under a false government a lot longer than since 2020…

What a shill fucking post.

The most common comment from retards who lack any substance. Cope harder with your “military taking down the US govt is not a coup cuz I don’t like thinking of it that way” bs. When you remove govt by force, its a damn coup. It doesn’t matter if you cope with “removing occupiers” or not, its still a damn coup.

3
AllowMeToExplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

Simon Parkes is legit cuz googling his name turns up no mention in the top results of things like “is a conspiracy theorist”; “far right extremist”; “qanon baseless conspiracy promoter”; or anything of the sort. So legit shill, stooge, and/or grifter he is.

3
AllowMeToExplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

I might have missed it but didn’t hear him say when he gave it to him.

Under Smith’s publicly stated scope, what would make this guy think it was appropriate to give it to him? 🤔

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

When MSM “deboooooonks” the “baseless conspiracy theory” then I will be more certain of what we have here. Maybe I am wrong to be on the fence about this. My gut bats pretty close to 1.000 though. It would be a mistake for me to doubt my inner thoughts about this without a lot more coming out.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1626803711409287168

This does seem to lend credibility. But I, for one, would have made a much more direct and bold statement about this than what Kari did. This is pretty tempered compared to what ought to follow such a bombshell allegation.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish I could put a finger on it. It just isn’t right to me. Very unnatural is perhaps the best way I could put it.

1
AllowMeToExplain 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know what you’re saying. But as I said to someone else, “over the target” is an MSM “deboooooonking” of a “Baseless conspiracy theory.” I don’t see anything like that out there. Pure radio silence.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is true. I’m not sure that it means what you’re suggesting though. If MSM came out and said “A conspiracy theorist testified about baseless allegations of mortgage fraud among Arizona officials…” then we would know we are over the target.

2
AllowMeToExplain 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t understand this. Asylum is currently done via application. Fill out a form, mail it to the appropriate address, have CBP officer interview, if pass then have hearing with immigration judge, then wait for your 96% rejection odds. How does a phone app make it more prone to fraud?

I’m always weary of “bipartisan” demands to change something in the immigration system. They usually favor changes that do not favor the US citizen.

3
AllowMeToExplain 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s where I am. Perhaps leaning towards hoax or psyop. But I am open to being persuaded otherwise. Something just reeks about this story. I can’t explain it. Just gut instinct is telling me not to swallow yet.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›